Elites no Reino Unido: novas abordagens para divisões de classe contemporâneas

Autores

  • Ana Paula Hey Universidade de São Paulo. Departamento de Sociologia
  • Anna Grimaldi-Christensen London School of Economics
  • Mike Savage London School of Economics

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/0103-2070.ts.2017.125956

Palavras-chave:

Novas elites, Elites no Reino Unido, Elites da financeirização, Elites e divisões sociais

Resumo

O objetivo do artigo é demonstrar as “novas” elites que emergem no Reino Unido no contexto econômico, político e social do neoliberalismo. Para tal, utilizam-se os amplos trabalhos de Mike Savage acerca do significado do estudo de elites para as formas contemporâneas das divisões sociais. Os dados do Great British Class Survey servem de base para este autor delinear os elementos sociológicos centrais da composição destas elites da financeirização. Descrevem-se as clivagens em termos de mobilidade social, educação, localização e politização geradas pela concentração de distintos tipos de capital (econômico, social e cultural). A partir da especificidade britânica, pretende-se contribuir para o desenvolvimento da sociologia das elites tanto na discussão de novas perspectivas quanto nos limites e possibilidades da abordagem em diferentes contextos geográficos, políticos e sociais.

Downloads

Os dados de download ainda não estão disponíveis.

Biografia do Autor

  • Ana Paula Hey, Universidade de São Paulo. Departamento de Sociologia

    Professora no Departamento de Sociologia e no Programa de Pós-Graduação em Sociologia da USP. 

  • Anna Grimaldi-Christensen, London School of Economics

    PhD Candidate King´s College London and visiting PhD student at University of São Paulo.

  • Mike Savage, London School of Economics

    Professor of sociology and co-director of International Inequalities Institute of London School of Economics.

Referências

Anselin, Luc. (1995), “Local indicators of spatial association – lisa”. Geographical Analysis, 27 (2): 93-115.

Bennett, Tony et al. (2009), Culture, class, distinction. London, Routledge.

Boltanski, Luc. (2013), “La domination c’est la mise a l’épreuve”. Libération, 13/9.

Bourdieu, Pierre. (1966), “Condition de classe et position de classe”. Archives Européennes de Sociologie, 7 (2): 201-223.

_____. (1979), La distinction: critique sociale au jugement. Paris, Minuit.

_____. (1985), “The social space and the genesis of groups”. Theory and Society, 14 (6): 723-744.

_____. (2000), Pascalian meditations. Cambridge (uk), Polity.

Clark, Harold & Acock, Alan. (1989), “National elections and political attitudes: the case of political efficacy”. British Journal of Political Science, 19 (4): 551-562.

Cunningham, Niall & Savage, Mike. (2015), “The secret garden? Elite metropolitan geographies in the contemporary uk”. The Sociological Review, 63 (2): 321-348.

Devine, Fiona & Snee, Helene. (2015), “Doing the Great British Class Survey”. The Sociological Review, 63 (2): 240-258.

Froud, Julie et al. (2006), “Rethinking elite research”. Journal of Management and Social Sciences, 2 (1): 25-41.

Hey, Ana Paula & Catani, Afrânio. (2013), “Ladrilhando o concreto: construindo pesquisas a partir de Bourdieu”. In: Oliveira, João F. de & Pessoa, Jadir (orgs). Pesquisar com Bourdieu. Goiânia, Canône, pp. 31-52.

Latimer, Joanna & Munro, Rolland. (2015), “Uprooting class? Culture, world-making and reform”. The Sociological Review, 63 (2): 415-432.

Laurison, Daniel. (2015), “The right to speak: differences in political engagement among the British elite”. The Sociological Review, 63 (2): 349-372.

Laurison, Daniel & Friedman, Sam. (2016), “The class pay gap in higher professional and managerial occupations”. American Sociological Review, 81 (4): 668-695.

Lui, Tai-Lok. (2015), “Gbcs: an answer in search of a question”. The Sociological Review, 63 (2): 480-492.

May, Tim. (2015), “Symptomatic social science: reflexivity, recognition and redistribution in the gbcs”. The Sociological Review, 63 (2): 400-414.

Mills, Colin. (2015), “The Great British Class Survey: requiescat in pace”. The Sociological Review, 63 (2): 393-399.

O’Sullivan, David & Unwin, David J. (2003), Geographic information analysis. Hoboken, John Wiley & Sons.

Piketty, Thomas. (2013), Le capital au xxie siècle. Paris, Seuil.

Savage, Mike. (2015), “Introduction to elites: from the ‘problematic of the proletariat’ to a class analysis ‘wealth elites’”. The Sociological Review, 63 (2): 223-239.

______. (2016), “End class wars”. Nature, 537: 475-479.

Savage, Mike et al. (2013). “A new model of social class? Findings from the bbc’s Great British Class Survey experiment”. Sociology, 47 (2): 219-250.

______. (2015a), “Espace culturel britannique et classes sociales”. In: Lebaron, Frédéric & Le Roux, Brigitte. La méthodologie de Pierre Bourdieu en action. Paris, Dunod, pp. 183-210.

______. (2015b), “On social class, anno 2014”. Sociology, 49 (6): 1011-1030.

______. (2015c), Social class in the 21st century. London, Pelican.

Savage, Mike & Williams, Karel. (2008), “Elites: remembered in capitalism and forgotten by social sciences”. The Sociological Review, 56 (s1): 1-24.

Silva, Elizabeth. (2015), “Class in contemporary Britain: comparing the Cultural Capital and Social Exclusion (ccse) project and the Great British Class Survey (gbcs)”. The Sociological Review, 63 (2): 373-392.

Skeggs, Beverley. (2015), “Introduction: stratification or exploitation, domination, dispossession and devaluation?”. The Sociological Review, 63 (2): 205-222.

Toscano, Alberto & Woodcock, Jamie. (2015), “Spectres of marxism: a comment on Mike Savage’s market model of class difference”. The Sociological Review, 63 (2): 512-523.

Tyler, Imogen. (2015), “Classificatory struggles: class, culture and inequality in neoliberal time”. The Sociological Review, 63 (2): 493-511.

Wakeling, Paul & Savage, Mike. (2015), “Entry to elite positions and the stratification of higher education in Britain”. The Sociological Review, 63 (2): 290-320.

Publicado

2017-12-12

Edição

Seção

Dossiê - Elites

Como Citar

Elites no Reino Unido: novas abordagens para divisões de classe contemporâneas. (2017). Tempo Social, 29(3), 161-179. https://doi.org/10.11606/0103-2070.ts.2017.125956