Rewriting the “caoineadh”: Dermot Bolger’s The Lament for Arthur Cleary

Authors

  • Giovanna Tallone Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37389/abei.v11i0.3647

Keywords:

Dermot Bolger, Caoineadh, The Lament for Arthur Cleary

Abstract

Dermot Bolger’s play The Lament for Arthur Cleary is an experimental and innovative work focusing on the context of suburban Dublin life and on the character of a migrant worker. In the background of a Dublin that has become a prey of unemployment, poverty and heroin, Bolger reconstructs and rewrites the eighteenth-century Gaelic poem Caoineadh Airt Uí Laoghaire in order to face and discuss issues of contemporary Irish life. However, the use and/or distortion of typical features of a traditional “caoineadh” are at the basis of the play, whose structure and organisation rework motifs and elements to be found
in Caoineadh Airt Uí Laoghaire and in the keening tradition at large.
The purpose of this essay is to analyse Bolger’s The Lament for Arthur Cleary vis-à-vis Caoineadh Airt Uí Laoghaire, identifying images and structural elements that are reworked and rewritten in the structural organisation of the play.

Author Biography

  • Giovanna Tallone, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore

    TALLONE, Giovanna is a graduate in Modern Languages from Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan, and holds a PhD in English Studies from the University of Florence. An EFL teacher, she is currently attached to the Department of English at Università Cattolica, Milan. She has presented papers at several IASIL conferences and has published articles and critical reviews on Brian Friel, Éilís Ní Dhuibhne, Clare Boylan, Lady Gregory, Mary Lavin, James Stephens, and Seamus Heaney. Her research interests include contemporary Irish drama, Irish women writers, and the remakes of Old Irish legends.

Downloads

Published

2009-06-17

Issue

Section

Theatre

How to Cite

Tallone, G. (2009). Rewriting the “caoineadh”: Dermot Bolger’s The Lament for Arthur Cleary. ABEI Journal, 11, 47-59. https://doi.org/10.37389/abei.v11i0.3647