Effects of reducing postprandial hyperglycemia and metabolism of acetate wheat starch on healthy mice

Authors

  • Dung Huu Tran Faculty of Pharmacy, College of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University, Vietnam https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3283-9025
  • Phan Kim Thuy Faculty of Pharmacy, College of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University, Vietnam
  • Chu Thi Thu Hien Faculty of Pharmacy, Buon Me Thuat University, Vietnam
  • Thai Khoa Bao Chau Faculty of Pharmacy, College of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University, Vietnam
  • Nguyen Huu Tien Faculty of Pharmacy, College of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University, Vietnam
  • Nguyen Van Thanh Toan Faculty of Pharmacy, College of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University, Vietnam

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/s2175-97902020000118837

Keywords:

Acetate wheat starch, Glucose, SCFA, Caecum

Abstract

Recently, the acetate wheat starch (AWS) has been prepared by acetylation with an acetyl content of 2.42%, containing of rapidly digestible starch (RDS), slowly digestible starch (SDS) and resistant starch (RS) with 25.0%; 22.9% and 34.5%, respectively. In this study, this kind of starch was continuously evaluated with the postprandial blood glucose response and determined short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) metabolized from AWS in the gastrointestinal tract of healthy mice by HPLC. The result showed that the mice fed with AWS exhibited a very limited increase in blood glucose level and remained stable for 2 hours after meals efficiently comparing with the control group fed with natural wheat starch (NWS). Simultaneously, the content of SCFAs produced in the caecum of the mice fed with AWS was significantly higher than mice fed with NWS, especially with acetic and propionic acids by 28% and 26%, respectively. Thus, AWS has shown to limit the postprandial hyperglycemia in mice effectively through the resistance to amylase hydrolysis in the small intestine. When going into the caecum, it is fermented to form SCFAs providing a part of energy for the body’s activities, avoiding rotten fermentation causing digestive disorders which are inherent restrictions of normal high cellulose and fiber food.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Birt DF, Boylston T, Hendrich S, Jane J-L, Hollis J, Li L, et al. Resistant starch: promise for improving human health. Adv Nutr. 2013;4(6):587-601.

Den Besten G, Lange K, Havinga R, van Dijk TH, Gerding A, van Eunen K. Gut-derived short-chain fatty acids are vividly assimilated into host carbohydrates and lipids. Am J Physiol Gastrointestinal Liver Physiol. 2013;305(12):G900-G10.

FDA Announces Health Claim For Resistant Starch [cited 2016 Dec 13]. Available from: Available from: https://resistantstarchresearch.com/posts/fda-announces-health-claim-for-resistant-starch/

» https://resistantstarchresearch.com/posts/fda-announces-health-claim-for-resistant-starch/

Govers M, Gannon N, Dunshea F, Gibson P, Muir J. Wheat bran affects the site of fermentation of resistant starch and luminal indexes related to colon cancer risk: a study in pigs. Gut. 1999;45(6):840-7.

Khanh NTM. Simultaneous determination of several short-chain fatty acids in mice’s feces by HPLC. Hue: Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy; 2017.

Kimura I, Ozawa K, Inoue D, Imamura T, Kimura K, Maeda T. The gut microbiota suppresses insulin-mediated fat accumulation via the short-chain fatty acid receptor GPR43. Nat Commun. 2013;4:1829.

Le Leu RK, Brown IL, Hu Y, Morita T, Esterman A, Young GP. Effect of dietary resistant starch and protein on colonic fermentation and intestinal tumourigenesis in rats. Carcinogenesis. 2007;28(2):240-5.

Le Thanh-Blicharz J, Anioła J, Kowalczewski P, Przygoński K, Zaborowska Z, Lewandowicz G. Type IV resistant starch increases cecum short chain fatty acids level in rats. Acta Biochim Polonica. 2014;61(1):109-14.

Ley RE, Bäckhed F, Turnbaugh P, Lozupone CA, Knight RD, Gordon JI. Obesity alters gut microbial ecology. Proc Nat Acad Sci. 2005;102(31):11070-5.

Macfarlane S, Macfarlane GT. Regulation of short-chain fatty acid production. Proc Nutr Soc. 2003;62(1):67-72.

Morita T, Kasaoka S, Kiriyama S, Brown IL, Topping DL. Comparative effects of acetylated and unmodified high-amylose maize starch in rats. Starch-Stärke. 2005;57(6): 246-53.

Robertson MD, Bickerton AS, Dennis AL, Vidal H, Frayn KN. Insulin-sensitizing effects of dietary resistant starch and effects on skeletal muscle and adipose tissue metabolism. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005;82(3):559-67.

Shimada R, Yoshimura M, Murakami K, Ebihara K. Plasma concentrations of GLP-1 and PYY in rats fed dietary fiber depend on the fermentability of dietary fiber and respond to an altered diet. Int J Clin Nutr Dietetics. 2015;1(1):1-7.

Shimotoyodome A, Suzuki J, Fukuoka D, Tokimitsu I, Hase T. RS4-type resistant starch prevents high-fat diet-induced obesity via increased hepatic fatty acid oxidation and decreased postprandial GIP in C57BL/6J mice. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metabol. 2009;298(3):E652-E62.

Si X, Zhou Z, Strappe P, Blanchard C. A comparison of RS4-type resistant starch to RS2-type resistant starch in suppressing oxidative stress in high-fat-diet-induced obese rats. Food Function. 2017;8(1):232-40.

Uyen TTN, Nam NK, Dung TH. Preparation and characterisation of acetylated wheat starch supporting for diabetes treatment, Journal of Medicine and Pharmacy. 2018;5(8):78-84 (in Vietnamese).

Weitkunat K, Schumann S, Nickel D, Kappo KA, Petzke KJ, Kipp AP. Importance of propionate for the repression of hepatic lipogenesis and improvement of insulin sensitivity in high-fat diet-induced obesity. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2016;60(12):2611-21.

Wolever T, Vorster H, Björck I, Brand-Miller J, Brighenti F, Mann J. Determination of the glycaemic index of foods: interlaboratory study. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2003;57(3):475.

Downloads

Published

2023-02-28

Issue

Section

Original Article

How to Cite

Effects of reducing postprandial hyperglycemia and metabolism of acetate wheat starch on healthy mice. (2023). Brazilian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 58. https://doi.org/10.1590/s2175-97902020000118837