Philosophy of Art as Meta-Criticism: Some Questions after Noël Carroll
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2318-8863.discurso.2023.215687Keywords:
art criticism, meta-criticism of art, philosophy of art criticism, critical evaluation, aesthetic nominalismAbstract
The article inquires the recent revitalization of philosophy of art as meta-criticism, by Noël Carroll. It will particularly examine the normative content of Carrollian meta-criticism as it is revealed in his concept of art criticism and in his doctrine of critical evaluation. The hypothesis defended in the article is that Carroll raises transitory configurations of the artworld and the ontology of the artwork to the condition of critical norm, which contributes to the fact that his meta-criticism becomes an abstract theory of art criticism. However, we can deduce from Carroll’s account valuable indications for a contemporary reform of art meta-criticism.
Downloads
References
Adorno, T. (1970). Ästhetische Theorie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Bokiniec, M. (2010). “Book Review: Noël Carroll, On Criticism”. Estetika: The Central European Journal of Aesthetics, v. 47, n. 3, 2010, p. 105-111.
Bürger, T. (2017). Theorie der Avantgarde. Göttingen: Wallstein.
Butt, G. (ed.) (2004). After Criticism: New Responses to Art and Performance. Lon-dres: Blackwell.
Carroll, N. (1993). “Art, Intention and Conversation”. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, v. 51, n. 2, p. 245-52.
Carroll, N. (1997). “The Intentional Fallacy: Defending Myself”. The Journal of Aes-thetics and Art Criticism, v. 55, n. 3, p. 305-309
Carroll, N. (2009). On Criticism. New York and London: Routledge.
Carter, (2009). “Carroll, Noël: On Criticism”. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, v. 67, n. 4, p. 421-3.
Danto, A. (2014). O descredenciamento filosófico da arte. Trad. Rodrigo Duarte. Belo Horizonte: Autêntica.
Dickie, G. (2001). Art and Value. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Elkins, J. (2003). What Happened to Art Criticism? Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.
Elkins, J.; Newman, M. (ed.) (2008). The State of Art Criticism. Londres: Routledge.
Forceville, C. (2009). “Book Review: On Criticism by Noël Carroll”. Language and Literature, v. 18, n. 4, p. 405-408.
Foster, H. et al. (2002). “Round Table: The Present Conditions of Art Criticism”. October, v. 100, p. 200-228.
Huddleston, A. (2012). “The Conversation Argument for Actual Intentionalism”. The British Journal of Aesthetics, v. 52, n. 3, p. 241-256
Kristeller, P. O. (1980). Renaissance Thought and The Arts. Collected Essays. Prince-ton: Princeton University Press.
Maes, H. (2010). “Intention, Interpretation, and Contemporary Visual Art”. Brit-ish Journal of Aesthetics. v. 52, n. 3, p. 241-256.
Osborne, P. (2013). Anywhere or Not At All: Philosophy of Contemporary Art. Lon-don: Verso.
Puolakka, K. “Discussion on ‘Criticism and Interpretation’ by Noël Carroll”. Sztuka i filozofia (Varsóvia), n. 42, p. 7-20.
Rubinstein, R. (2003). “A Quiet Crisis”. Art in America, v. 91, n. 3, p. 39-45
Pucciarelli, D. (2018). “Da Teoria estética à Inestética: Conceito e função da esté-tica em Adorno e Badiou”. Dois Pontos, v. 15, n. 2, p. 23-31.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Daniel Pucciarelli
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
O trabalho da Discurso foi licenciado com uma Licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International.
Os autores aqui publicados mantém os direitos sobre seus artigos
De acordo com os termos seguintes:
-
Atribuição [BY] — Deve-se dar o crédito apropriado, prover um link para a licença e indicar se mudanças foram feitas.
-
NãoComercial [NC] — É proibido o uso deste material para fins comerciais.
-
CompartilhaIgual [SA] — Caso haja remixagem, transformação ou criação a partir do material, é necessário distribuir as suas contribuições sob a mesma licença que o original.
