What influences flexitarians to reduce meat consumption in Brazil?

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/s0103-4014.2023.37109.015

Keywords:

Animal welfare, Environmental impact, Price, Reflective, Healthiness

Abstract

The reduction in meat consumption has been pointed out as a possibility to encourage sustainable patterns of consumption and production today. This study aims investigate what motivates flexitarians to reduce meat consumption in Brazil, as well as to categorize flexitarians into distinct groups, considering the frequency with which meat is consumed. To reach the respondents, the snowball sampling technique was used, and the questionnaire was made available on the Google Docs platform. Data collection took place in November 2022 and a total of 275 responses were obtained. As a result, the prevalence of a public, mostly female, single, with high education and average income of R$ 5743.50 was identified. In addition, three segments of flexitarians were categorized: little reflective (28.7%); reflective (49.9%) and very reflective (21.5%). The three main reasons for reducing meat consumption showed overlap between the flexitarian segments, with healthiness and reducing the environmental impact being unanimous among the three groups. It is concluded that, in addition to health and the environment, animal welfare is at the center of concerns when reducing meat consumption, especially by the very reflective flexitarian segment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AGÊNCIA BRASIL. IBGE revela desigualdade no acesso à educação e queda no analfabetismo. Disponível em: <https://agenciabrasil.ebc.com.br/educacao/noticia/2023-06/ibge-revela-desigualdade-no-acesso-educacao-e-queda-no-analfabetismo>. Acesso em: 3 jul. 2023.

ALVES, B. Flexitarianismo: o que é tendência que pode ser ‘degrau’ para quem quer virar vegetariano. BBC News, 2022. Disponível em: <https://www.bbc.com/portuguese/geral-62695317>. Acesso em: 26 jun. 2023.

BÁNÁTI, D. Flexitarianism - the sustainable food consumption? ÉLELMISZERVIZSGÁLATI, v.68, n.3, p.4075, 2022. https://doi.org./10.52091/EVIK-2022/3-6-ENG

BAYER. The Bayer food focus project. 2019. Disponível em: <https://nutritionfoundation.org.nz/sites/default/files/Bayer_Survey%20Report_v10.pdf>. Acesso em: 11 nov. 2022.

BIERNACKI, P.; WALDORF, D. Snowball sampling: Problems and techniques of chain referral sampling. Sociological Methods & Research, v.10, n.2, p.141-63, 1981.

BLATNER, D. J. et al. Best Diets Overall 2023. Flexitarian Diet. Disponível em: <https://health.usnews.com/best-diet/flexitarian-diet>. Acesso em: 26 jun. 2023.

BRAAKHUIS, A. et al. A Modern Flexitarian Dietary Intervention Incorporating Web-Based Nutrition Education in Healthy Young Adults: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Research Protocols, v.10, n.12, 2021. e30909.10.2196/30909

BRUNS, A. et al. Application of a Modified Healthy Eating Index (HEI-Flex) to Compare the Diet Quality of Flexitarians, Vegans and Omnivores in Germany. Nutrients, v.14, n.15, 3038. 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14153038

DAGEVOS, H.; VERBEKE, W. Meat consumption and flexitarianism in the Low Countries. Meat Science, v. 192, p. 108894, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2022.108894

DAGEVOS, H. Finding flexitarians: Current studies on meat eaters and meat reducers. Trends in Food Science & Technology, v.114, p.530-9, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2021.06.021

DERBYSHIRE, E. J. Flexitarian diets and health: a review of the evidence-based literature. Frontiers in nutrition, v.3, p.55, 2017.

DIEESE. Departamento Intersindical de Estatística e Estudos Socioeconômicos. Mulheres, inserção no mercado de trabalho. 2022. Disponível em: <https://www.dieese.org.br/infografico/2023/infograficosMulheres2023.html>. Acesso em: 3 jul. 2023.

DU, S.; BHATTACHARYA, C. B.; SEN, S. Maximizing business returns to corporate social responsibility (CSR): The role of CSR communication. International journal of management reviews, v.12, n.1, p.8-19, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6606.2001.tb00102.x

EOM, K.; KIM, H. S.; SHERMAN, D. K. Social class, control, and action: Socioeconomic status differences in antecedents of support for pro-environmental action. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, v.77, p.60-75, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.03.009

FONTENELLE, I. A. Dilemas éticos na cultura do consumo: Antropoceno, psicanálise e capitalismo como modo de operação das paixões. Estudos Avançados, v.37, p.319-34, 2023.

GOMES, D. V. Educação para o consumo ético e sustentável. REMEA - Revista Eletrônica do Mestrado em Educação Ambiental, v.16, 2012. https://doi.org/10.14295/remea.v16i0.2778

GOUSSET, C. et al. Perception of cultured “meat” by French consumers according to their diet. Livestock Science, v.260, 104909, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2022.104909

HAIDER, M.; SHANNON, R.; MOSCHIS, G. P. Sustainable consumption research and the role of marketing: A review of the literature (1976-2021). Sustainability, v.14, n.7, p.3999, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14073999

HAIR, J. F. et al. Análise Multivariada de Dados. S. l.: Bookman Editora, 2009.

IBGE. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Censo Demográfico. Disponível em: <https://censo2022.ibge.gov.br>. Acesso em: 3 jul. 2023.

KEMPER, J. A.; WHITE, S. K. Young adults’ experiences with flexitarianism: The 4Cs. Appetite, v.160, 105073, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2020.105073

LEVINE, D. S.; STRUBE, M. J. Environmental attitudes, knowledge, intentions and behaviors among college students. The Journal of social psychology, v.152, n.3, p.308-26, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2011.604363

MALEK, L.; UMBERGER, W. J. How flexible are flexitarians? Examining diversity in dietary patterns, motivations and future intentions. Cleaner and Responsible Consumption, v.3, 100038, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clrc.2021.100038

MALEK, L. et al. Is anti-consumption driving meat consumption changes in Australia? British Food Journal, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-03-2018-0183

MOHR, L. A.; WEBB, D. J.; HARRIS, K. E. Do consumers expect companies to be socially responsible? The impact of corporate social responsibility on buying behavior. Journal of Consumer affairs, v.35, n.1, p.45-72, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6606.2001.tb00102.x

MURRAY, K. B.; VOGEL, C. M. Using a hierarchy-of-effects approach to gauge the effectiveness of corporate social responsibility to generate goodwill toward the firm: Financial versus nonfinancial impacts. Journal of Business Research, v.38, n.2, p.141-59, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(96)00061-6

PORTER, M. E.; KRAMER, M. R. Creating shared value: How to reinvent capitalism-And unleash a wave of innovation and growth. In: LENSSEN, G. G.; SMITH, N. C. (Ed.) Managing Sustainable Business. Springer, Dordrecht, 2018. p.323-46. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1144-7_16

RIBEIRO, H.; JAIME, P. C.; VENTURA, D. Alimentação e sustentabilidade. Estudos Avançados, v.31, p.185-98, 2017.

SCHNEIDER, S. et al. Os efeitos da pandemia da Covid-19 sobre o agronegócio e a alimentação. Estudos Avançados, v.34, p.167-88, 2020.

SCHULTZ, P. Environmental attitudes and behaviors across cultures. Online readings in psychology and culture, v.8, n.1, p.4, 2002. https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1070.

SEYFANG, G. Shopping for sustainability: can sustainable consumption promote ecological citizenship? Environmental politics, v.14, n.2, p.290-306, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010500055209

SIJTSEMA, S. J. et al. Capabilities and opportunities of flexitarians to become food innovators for a healthy planet: two explorative studies. Sustainability, v.13, n.20, 11135, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011135

SOBAL, J. et al. A conceptual model of the food choice process over the life course. Frontiers in Nutritional Science, v.3, 1, 2006. Disponível em: <https://books.google.com.br/books?hl=pt-BR&lr=&id=_t0IoTcVxIIC&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&dq=A+conceptual+model+of+the+food+choice+process+over+the+life+course&ots=1oiTsPkcdi&sig=Y_sR5X4tb8kmwKp6YwolkKX6sh4#v=onepage&q=A%20conceptual%20model%20of%20the%20food%20choice%20process%20over%20the%20life%20course&f=false> Acesso em: 11 nov. 2022

STANSZUS, L. et al. Education for sustainable consumption through mindfulness training: Development of a consumption-specific intervention. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, v.19, n.1, p.5-21, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1515/jtes-2017-0001.

TEIXEIRA, R. P. Características e preferências do público dos alimentos plant-base. Disponível em: <https://www.ecodebate.com.br/2021/07/07/caracteristicas-e-preferencias-do-publico-dos-alimentos-plant-based/>. Acesso em: 26 jun. 2023.

UN GENERAL ASSEMBLY. Transforming Our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. United Nations. New York, NY, USA A/RES/70/1(2015).

VERAIN, M. C. et al. Flexitarianism in the Netherlands in the 2010 decade: Shifts, consumer segments and motives. Food Quality and Preference, v.96, 104445, 2022. 10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104445

VOINEA, L. et al. Nutrient Profiling of Romanian Traditional Dishes-Prerequisite for Supporting the Flexitarian Eating Style.Information, v. 11, n. 11, p. 514, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/info11110514

WOZNIAK, H. et al. Vegetarian, pescatarian and flexitarian diets: sociodemographic determinants and association with cardiovascular risk factors in a Swiss urban population. British Journal of Nutrition, v.124, n.8, p.844-52, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114520001762

YUE, B. et al. Impact of consumer environmental responsibility on green consumption behavior in China: The role of environmental concern and price sensitivity. Sustainability, v.12, n.5, p.2074, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12052074.

Published

2023-12-05

How to Cite

Boscardin, M. ., Dorr, A. C. ., Breitenbach, R. ., & Brandão, J. B. . (2023). What influences flexitarians to reduce meat consumption in Brazil?. Estudos Avançados, 37(109), 243-260. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0103-4014.2023.37109.015