A economia dos custos de transação e a reforma na indústria de energia elétrica do Brasil

Autores

  • Edvaldo Alves de Santana Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina Autor
  • Carlos Augusto C.N.V. de Oliveira Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina Autor

Palavras-chave:

custo de transação, contratos, governança, eletricidade

Resumo

Esfe trabalho é uma confribuição para o estudo da reforma que está em curso na
indústria de energia eletrica do Brasil. A economia dos custos de transação e o referencial teórico utilizado para explicar as mudanças na estrutura de governança
vigente e para avaliar as possíveis efeifos da nova governança no desempenho da
indústria. Conclui-se que apesar dos mecanismos de incentivo à competição, como a
desverticalização, as restrições, as participações cruzadas (crossonwerships) e os limites
de auto-suprimento (self-dealing), a especificidade dos ativos envolvidos, a volatilidade
dos cusfos marginals de curto prazo, a necessidade de coordenação central e as
exigências de incentivos à expansão da capacidade instalada induzirão a indústria a
uma governançaa híbrida, abrangendo a competição e cooperação, mais esta do que aquela.

Downloads

Os dados de download ainda não estão disponíveis.

Referências

AGHION, P. and TIROLE, J. Formal and real authority in organizations.

Journal of Political Economy, v. 105, n. 1, p. 1-27, 1997.

ARENTSEN, M. and KUNNEKE, R. Economic organization and liberalization of the electricity industry. Energy Policy, v.24, n. 6, p. 541- 552, 1996

ARRIGHETTI, A., BACHMANN, R. and DEAKIN, S. Contract law, social norms and inter-firm cooperation. Cambridge Journal ofEconomics, v. 21, n. 2, p. 171-195, 1997.

BAI, X. SHAHIDEHPOUR, S. M., RAMESH, V C. and YU, E. Transmission analysis by Nash game method. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, v. 12, n. 3, p. 1046-1052, 1997.

BUCLKEY, P. J. and CHAPMAN, M. The perception and measurement of transaction costs. CambridgeJournal ofEconomics, v. 21, n. 2, p. 127-145, 1997.

CASAZZA, J. A. Reorganization of the UK electric supply industry. IEEE Power Engineering Review, p. 15-19, 1997.

CAVE, M. and WILLIAMSON, P. Entry, competition, and regulation in UK telecommunications. Oxford Review Economic Policy, v. 12, n. 4, p. 100-121, 1996.

CHALKLEY, M. and MALCOMSON, J. M. Competition in NHS quasimarkets. Oxford Review Economic Policy, v. 12, n. 4, p. 89-99, 1996.

COASE, R. H. The nature of the firm. Economica, v. 4, p. 396-405, 1937.

COASE, R. H. The firm, the markets and the law. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988.

COASE, R. H. A new institutional economics. TheAmerican Economic Review, v. 88, n. 2, p. 72-74. 1998.

DAVID, A. and WONG, K. Investment in competitive electricity; scop for incentives contracts. Energy Economics, v. 166, n. 1, p. 27-35, 1994.

DEAKIN, S. and MICHIE, J. Contracts and competition: an introduction. Cambridge Journal of Economics, v. 21, n. 2, p. 121-126, 1997.

DOW G- K. The function ofauthorithy in transactions cost economics. Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organizations, v. 8, p. 13-38, 1987.

FEHR, N. H. M. and HARBORD, D. Spot market competition in the UK electricity industry. The EconomicJournal, v. 103, p. 531-546, 1993.

GROSSMAN, S. J. and HART, O. The cost and benefits of ownerships: a theory ofvertical and lateral integration./owm^/ ofLaw and Economics, v. 94, n. 4, 1986.

HART, O. Incomplets contracts and the theory of the firm. In:

WTLLIAMSOM, O. and WINTER, S. (eds.), The nature of the firm. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.

HART, O. and MOORE, J. Incomplete contracts and renegotiation. Econometrica, v. 56, n. 4, p. 755-785, 1988.

HART, O. and MOORE, J. Property rights and the nature ofthe firm.Joumal ofPolitical Economy,

v. 98, p. 1119-1158, 1990.

HART, O. and MOORE, J. The governance ofexchanges: membres's cooperatives versus outsides ownership. Oxford Review ofEconomic Policy, v. 12, n. 4, p. 53-69, 1996.

HILL, C. W L. Internal capital market controls and financial performance in multidivisional firms. TheJournal ofIndustrial Economics, v. 37, n. 1, p. 67-83, 1988.

HOBBS, B. E Using game theory to analyze electric transmission pricing policies in the United States. European Journal of Operation Research, n. 56, p. 154-171, 1992.

HODGSON, G. M. Optimisation and evolution: Winter's critique of Friedman revisited. Cambridge Journal ofEconomics, v. 18, p. 413-430, 1994.

HOLMSTROM B. & ROBERTS, J. The boundaries of the firm revisited. Journal of Economic Perspectives, v. 12, n. 4, p. 73-94, 1998.

HUNT, S. and SHUTTLEWRTH, G. Competition and Choice in Electricity. West Sussex, England: Wiley, 1996.

JENKINSON, T. and MAYER, C. The assessment: contracts and competition. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, v. 12, n. 4, p. 1-10, 1996.

JOSKOW, P. L. and SCHMALENSEE, R. Marketspower: an analysis ofelectric utility deregulation. Cambridge; MIT Press, 1983.

JOSKOW, P. L. Contract duration and relationship-specific investments: empirical evidence from coal markets. The American Economic Review, v. 77, n. 1, p. 169-185, 1987.

JOSKOW, P. L. Asset specificity and the structure ofvertical relationships: empirical evidence. Journal ofLaw and Economics, v. 4, n. 1, 1988a.

JOSKOW, P. L. Price adjustment in long-term contracts; the case of coal. Journal of

Law and Economics, v. 31, p. 47-83, 1988b.

JOSKOW, P. L. The role of transactions cost economics in antitrust and public utility

regulatory policies. TheJournal ofLaw, Economics, &Organization, v. 7, Special Issue, p. 53-83, 1991.

JOSKOW, P. L. Restructuring, competition and regulatory reform in the U.S. electrcity sector. Journal ofEconomic Perspectives, v. 11, n. 3, p. 119-138, 1997.

KLEIN, B., CRAWFORD, R. and ALCHIAN, A. Vertical integration,

appropriable rents, and the competitive contracting. Jowrmr/ ofLaw and Economics, v. 21, n. 2, p. 297-326, 1978.

KREPS, D. M.A course in microecomic theory. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1990.

LYONS, B. R. Emprical relevance of efficient contract theory: inter-firm contracts. Oxford Review ofEconomic Policy, v. 12, n. 4, p. 27-52, 1996.

MACLEOD,WB. and MALCOMSON, J. Investment, hold-up, and the form of contracts. TheAmercian Economic Review, v. 83, n. 4, p. 811-837,1993.

MAHER, M. E. Transaction cost economics and cotractual relations. Cambridge Journal of Economics, v. 21, n. 2, p. 147-170, 1997.

MAYER, C. Corporate governance, competition and peAotmwnce. Journal of Law and Society, v. 24, p, 151-175, 1997.

MCAFEE, R. P. and SCHWARTZ, M. Opportunism in multilateral vertical contracting: nondiscrimination, exclusivity, and uniformity. American Economic Review, v. 84, n. 1, p. 210-230, 1994.

NEWBERY, D. M. and POLLITT, M. G. The restructuring and privatisation

of Britain's CEGB-was it worth it? TheJournal ofIndustrial Economics, v. XLy n. 3, p. 269-303, 1997.

NEWBERY, D. M. Competition, contracts, and entry in the eletricity spot market. RANDJournal ofEconomics, v. 29, n. 4, p. 726-749, 1998.

NISHIMURA, E, TABORS, R. D., ILIC, M. D. and MELERO, J. R. L.

Benefit optimization os centralized and descentralized power system in a multi-utility environment. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, v. 8, n. 3, p. 1180-1186, 1993.

NORTH, D. C. Instimtions. Journal ofEconomic Perspectives, v. 5, n. 1, p. 97-112, 1991.

OLIVEIRA, C. A. V O surgimento das estruturas hibridas de govemanga na indústria de energia elétrica no Brasil: a abordagem institucional da economia dos custos de transapdo. Dissertação de Mestrado em Economia, UFSC, 1998.

OUTHERD, H. A review of electricity industry restructuring in Australia. Electric Power Systems Reserach, v. 44, p. 15-25, 1998.

RUDNICK, H., VEBJELA, R. and HOGAN, W Evaluation of alternatives for power system coordination and pooling in a competitive environment.

In Proceeding 1996 Winter Meeting, Baltimore, Paper 96WM, p. 330-341, 1996.

RUUSUNEN, J. Dynamic cooperative electricity exchange in a power pool. IEEE Transactions System, Man and Cybernetics, v.21, n. 4, 1992.

SANTANA, E. A. Teoria do agente-principal, regulação e performance da

indústria de energia elétrica no Brasil. Anais do XXIII Encontro Nacional de Economia, v. 1, Salvador/BA, dezembro de 1995.

TABORS, R. D. Transmission system management and price: new paradigms and international comparasons. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, v. 9, n. 1, p. 206-215, 1994.

VICKERS, J. Market power and inefficiency: a contracts perspectives. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, v. 12, n. 4, p. 11-26, 1996.

WILLIAMSOM, O. The vertical integration of production: market failure considerations. The American Economic Review, v. 59, p. 112-123, 1971.

WILLIAMSOM, O.Markets and hierarquies: analysis and antitrust implications. New York:

Free Press Ed., 1975.

WILLIAMSOM, O. Transactions-cost economics: the governance of contractual. The

Journal ofLaw &Economics, v. 22, n. 2, p. 233-261, 1979.

WILLIAMSOM, O. The economics institutions ofcapitalism. New York: Free Press, 1985.

WILLIAMSOM, O. The logic of economic organization. In WILLIAMSON, O. and

WINTER, S. (eds.), The nature of the firm, origens, evolution and

development. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.

WINTER, S. (eds.).The mechanisms ofgovernance. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.

WINTER, S. (eds.). The institutions of governance. The Amercian Economic Review, v. 88, n. 2, p. 75-79, 1998.

Downloads

Publicado

01-09-1999

Edição

Seção

Não definida

Como Citar

Santana, E. A. de, & Oliveira, C. A. C. de. (1999). A economia dos custos de transação e a reforma na indústria de energia elétrica do Brasil. Estudos Econômicos (São Paulo), 29(3), 367-393. https://www.revistas.usp.br/ee/article/view/161471