A Theory of the firm allowing for multiple objectives

Autores

  • Juan Hersztajn Moldau Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Economia, Administração, Contabilidade

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-53573241jhm

Palavras-chave:

Teoria da firma, Modelos de utilidade da firma, Preferendas lexicograficas, Objetivos multiplos, Comportamento, Satisfação, Racionalidade limitada

Resumo

A distinção entre os casos de objetivos múltiplos irredutíveis e de argumentos múltiplos da função utilidade e o ponto de partida da análise. Um primeiro caso e tratado empregando-se o princípio lexicografico e mostra-se que os modelos de tipo Baumol e noções de comportamento tais como satisfação podem ganhar uma estrutura teórica. Mostra-se que a noção de satisfação implica a existência de equilibrios múltiplos. No segundo caso, correspondendo as funções de utilidade da firma quando estas apresentam forma funcional, uma condição necessária implicita restritiva para a existência de uma função de utilidade específica e revelada.

Downloads

Os dados de download ainda não estão disponíveis.

Referências

ALCHIAN, A. Uncertainty, evolution and economic theory. Journal of Political Economy, v. 58, p. 39-53, 1950.

ARROW, K. J. Invaluable goods.Journal of Economic Literature, v. 35, p. 757-765, 1997.

AUSTER, R. D.; SILVER, M. Comparative statics of the utility maximizing firm. Southern Economic Journal, v. 42, p. 626-632,1976.

BAUMOL, W J. On the theory of oligopoly. Economica, v. 25, p. 187- 198, 1958.

BAUMOL, W J. Business behavior value and growth. New York: The Macmillan Co., 1959.

BROWN, M.; REVANKAR, N. A generalized theory of the firm: an integration ofthe sales and profit maximization hypothesis. Kyklos, v.24, p. 427-443, 1971.

CONLISK, J. Why bounded rationality? Journal of Economic Literature, v.34, p. 669-700, 1996.

CYERT, R. M.; MARCH, J. G. A behavioral theory ofthe firm. 2nd ed. Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell, 1992.

DE PALMA, A.; MYERS, G. M.; PAPAGEORGIOU, Y. Y. Rational choice under an imperfect ability to choose. American Economic Review, v. 84, p. 419-440, 1994.

DRAKOPOLOUS, S. A. Hierarchical choice in economics./owrw#/ of Economic Surveys, v. 8, p. 133-153, 1994.

DUTTA, P. K.; RADNER, R. Profit maximization and the market selection hypothesis. Review of Economic Studies, v. 66, p. 769-798, 1999.

ELSTER, J. Solomonic judgments. Studies in the limitations ofrationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.

ENCARNACION, J. JR. Constraints and the firm's utility function. Review of Economic Studies, v. 32, p. 113-120, 1964.

ENCARNACION, J. JR. Consumer choice of qualities. Economica, v. 44, p. 63-72, 1990.

FERSHTMAN, C.; JUDD, K. L. Equilibrium incentives in oligopoly. American Economic Review, v. 77, p. 927-940, 1987.

FRIEDMAN, M. Essays in positive economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1953.

FORMBY, J. P.; MILLNER, E. L. The convergence of utility and profit maximization. Southern Economic Journal, v. 51, p. 1174-1185,1985.

GEORGESCU-ROEGEN, N. Choice, expectation and measurability. Quarterly Journal of Economics, v. 68, p. 503-534, 1954.

GEORGESCU-ROEGEN, N. Utility. In: SILLS, D. H. (ed.), InternationalEncyclopedia of The Social Sciences, v. 16, p. 236-267. New York: Macmillan Co., 1968.

GEORGESCU-ROEGEN, N. The entropy law and the economicprocess. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1971.

GILBOA, L; SCHMEIDLER, D. Case based decision theory. Quarterly Journal of Economics, v. 110, p. 605-639, 1995.

HAMMOND, P. J. Equity, Arrow's conditions, and Rawls's difference principle. Econometrica, v. 44, p. 793-804, 1976.

HANNAN, T. H. On the equivalence of profit maximization and utility maximization by an owner-manager: comment. Southern Economic Journal, v. 49, p. 255-259, 1982.

HAY, D. A.; MORRIS, D. J. Industrial economics and organization - theory and evidence. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 1991.

HERSZTAJN MOLDAU, J. A model of choice where choice is determined by an ordered set of irreducible criteria Journal of Economic Theory, v. 60, p. 354-377, 1993.

HOLMSTROM, B. R.; TIROLE, J. The theory of the firm. In SCHMALENSEE, R.; WILLIG, R. D. (eds.), Handbook of industrial organization. V 1, p. 61-133. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1989.

KAFOGLIS, M. Z.; BUSCHNELL, R. C. The revenue maximization oligopoly model: comment. American Economic Review, v. 60, p. 427-434, 1970.

KARANDIKAR, R.; MOOKHERJEE, D.; VEJA-REDONDO, E Evolving aspirations and cooperation.Journal ofEconomic Theory, v. 80, p. 292-331, 1998.

KLEIN, G. The fiction ofoptimization. In: GIGERENZER, G.; SELTEN, R. (eds.), Bounded rationality: the adaptive toolbox. MIT Press, 2001, p. 103-121.

LANDSBERGER, M.; SUBOTNIK, A. Optimal behavior of a monopolist facing a bicriteria objective function. International Economic Review, v. 170, p. 581-600, 1976.

LEIBENSTEIN, H. A branch of economics is missing: micro-micro theory.Journal of Economic Literature, v. 17, p. 477-502, 1979.

MAS-COLELL, A.; WHINSTON, M. D.; GREEN, J. R.Microeconomic theory. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.

MILLER, S. M.; ROMEO, A. A. Alternative goals and uncertainty in the theory ofthe firm. Southern Economic Journal, v. 46, p. 189-205, 1979.

NELSON, R. R.; WINTER, S. G. An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, Mass: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1982.

OLSEN, E. O. Profit maximization vs utility maximization: a correction. Southern Economic Journal, v. 43, p. 1390-1393, 1977.

PIRON, R. Utility maximization sufficient for competitive survival: comment.Journal of Political Economy, v. 82, p. 654-656, 1974.

RADNER, R. Bounded rationality, indeterminacy and the theory of the firm. Economic Journal, v. 106, p. 1360-1373, 1996.

RAWLS, ].A theory ofjustice. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1971.

ROSENBERG, R. Profit constrained revenue maximization: note. American Economic Review, v. 61, p. 208-209, 1971.

SAMUELSON, P. A. Complementarity - an essay on the 40th anniversary of the Hicks-Allen revolution in demand theory.Journal of Economic Literature, v. 12, p. 1255-1289, 1974.

SCITOVSKY, T. A note on profit maximization and its implications. Review ofEconomic Studies, v. 11, p. 57-60, 1943.

SELTEN, R. What is bounded rationality? In: GIGERENZER, G.;

SELTEN, R. (eds.), Bounded rationality: the adaptive toolbox. MIT Press, 2001, p. 13-36.

SEN, A. Entry and managerial incentives. InternationalJournal ofIndustrial Organization, v. 11, p. 123-137, 1993.

SEN, A. K. Social choice theory. In ARROW, K. J.; INTRILIGATOR, M. D. (eds.), Handbook of mathematical economics. V 3, p. 1073-1181. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1986.

SEN, A. K. Maximization and the act of choice. Econometrica, v. 65, p. 745-779, 1997.

SIMON, H. A. A behavioral model of rational choice. QuarterlyJournal of Economics, v. 69, p. 99-118, 1955.

SIMON, H. A. Theories ofdecision making in economics and behavioral science. American Economic Review, v. 49, p. 253-283, 1959.

SIMON, H. A. Administrative behavior: a study of decision making processes in administrative organization. 30. ed. New York: Free Press, 1976.

SIMON, H. A. Rational decision making in business organizations. American Economic Review, v. 69, 493-513, 1979.

SIMON, H. A. Bounded rationality. In: EATWELL, J. et al. (eds.), The new palgrave, a dictionary ofeconomics. London: Macmillan Press, 1987a.

SIMON, H. A. Satisficing. In: EATWELL, J. et al. (eds.), The new palgrave, a dictionary of economics. London: Macmillan Press, 1987b.

SKLIVAS, S. D. The strategic choice ofmanagerial incentives. Journal of Economics, v. 18, p. 452-458, 1987.

UZAWA, H. Preference and rational choice in the theory of consumption. In: CHIPMAN, J. et al. (eds.), Preferences, utility and demand. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1971, p. 7-28.

WILLIAMSON, O. The economics ofdiscretionary behavior. Chicago, 1967.

YARROW G. On the predictions of the managerial theory of the firm. Journal of Industrial Economics, v. 24, p. 267-279, 1976.

Downloads

Publicado

01-12-2002

Edição

Seção

Artigo

Como Citar

Moldau, J. H. . (2002). A Theory of the firm allowing for multiple objectives. Estudos Econômicos (São Paulo), 32(4), 511-549. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-53573241jhm