Impactos da volatilidade da taxa de câmbio no comércio setorial do Mercosul

Autores

  • Mauricio V. L. Bittencourt Universidade Federal do Paraná. Departamento de Economia Autor
  • Donald W. Larson The Ohio State University. Department of Agricultural, Environmental and Development Economics Autor
  • Stanley R. Thompson The Ohio State University. Department of Agricultural, Environmental and Development Economics Autor

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-41612007000400004

Palavras-chave:

comércio bilateral, volatilidade da taxa de câmbio, econometria de painel, modelos gravitacionais, mercosul

Resumo

Este estudo capta o impacto da volatilidade da taxa de câmbio real bilateral no comércio. Estima-se um modelo gravitacional setorial utilizando-se duas medidas de volatilidade da taxa de câmbio. Os resultados mostram que uma redução na volatilidade da taxa de câmbio, o crescimento da renda e a redução das tarifas comerciais contribuem para aumentar o comércio bilateral no Mercosul. Este estudo sugere a inclusão e implementação de políticas comuns, estáveis e integradas entre os países do Mercosul, de modo a reduzir os impactos adversos da volatilidade cambial no comércio dos países envolvidos.

Downloads

Os dados de download ainda não estão disponíveis.

Referências

Averbug, A. Mercosul: conjuntura e perspectivas. Revista do BNDES, dezembro de 1998.

Baer, W.; Silva, P.; Cavalcanti, T. Economic Integration without Policy Coordination: the case of Mercosur. Manuscript. University of Illinois, Champaign-Urbana, 2001.

Baldwin, R.E. Hysteresis in import prices: the beachhead effect. The American Economic

Review 78, p.773-785, 1988.

Baldwin, R.E; Krugman, P. Persistent trade effects of large exchange rate shocks. Quarterly Journal of Economics 104, p.635-655, 1989.

Batten, D.S.; M.T. Belongia, M.T. Monetary policy, real exchange rates and U.S. agricultural exports. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 68, p. 422-427,1986.

Bergstrand, J.H. The generalized gravity equation, monopolistic competition, and

the factor-proportions theory in international trade. Review of Economics and Statistics, 71(1), p.143-153, 1989.

Bessler, D.A.; Babula, R.A.. Forecasting wheat exports: Do exchange rates matter?.

Journal of Business, Economics and Statistics 5, p.397- 406, 1987.

Bittencourt, M.V.L. The impacts of trade liberalization and macroeconomic instability on

the Brazilian economy. (Ph.D. Dissertation). The Ohio State University, 2004.

Brodsky, D. Fixed versus flexible exchange rates, and the measurement of exchange

rate instability. Journal of International Economics 16, p. 295-306, 1984.

Cho, G. D. Real exchange rate movements and agricultural trade. (Ph.D. Dissertation).

The Ohio State University, 2001.

Cho, G., Sheldon, I. M.; McCorriston, S. Exchange rate uncertainty and agricultural

trade. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 84 (4), p.932-942, 2002.

Cushman, D.O. US bilateral trade flows and exchange risk during the floating period.

Journal of International Economy 24, p.317-330, 1988.

Deardorff, A. Determinants of bilateral trade: does gravity work in a Neoclassical

world?. In: Frankel, J. (Ed.). In the Regionalization of the World Economy. Chicago:

University of Chicago Press, 1998.

De Grauwe, P. Exchange rate variability and the slowdown in growth of international

trade. IMF Staff Papers n.24, 317-330, 1988.

De Grauwe, P; De Bellefroid, B. Long-run exchange rate variability and international

trade. In: S. Arndt, S.; Richardson, J.D. (Eds). Real-Financial Linkages Among Open Economies. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1986.

Dell’Ariccia, G. Exchange rate fluctuations and trade flows. IMF Staff Papers n. 46, p. 293-314, 1999.

Dornbusch, R. Exchange rates and prices. The American Economic Review 77, p.93-106, 1987.

Egger, P. An econometric view on the estimation of gravity models and the calculation of trade potentials. The World Economy 25(2), p.297-312, 2002.

Eichengreen, B. Does Mercosur need a single currency? NBER Working Paper n.6821,

Cambridge, MA. NBER, 1998.

Eichengreen, B; Irwin, D.A. Trade blocs and the reorientation of trade in the 1930s. Journal of International Economy 38, p.1-24, 1995.

Evenett, S.J.; Keller, W. On theories explaining the success of the gravity equation.

Journal of Political Economy 110 (2), p.281-316, 2002.

Frankel, J.; Wei, S. Trade blocs and currency blocs. NBER Working Paper n.4335, Cambridge, MA. NBER, 1993.

Frankel, J.; Wei, S; Stein, E.; Wei, S. Continental trading blocs: are they natural or supernatural?

In: Frankel, J. (Ed.). In the Regionalization of the World Economy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998.

Froot, K. A. ; Klemperer, P.D. Exchange rate pass-through when market share matters.

The American Economic Review 79, p.637-654, 1989.

Haley, S.L.; Krissoff, B. U.S. grain exports and the value of the U.S. dollar. Journal of Agricultural Economics Research 39, p.12-21, 1987.

Helpman, E. Imperfect competiton and international trade: evidence from fourteen

industrial countries. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies 1, p.62-81, 1987.

Hooper, P.; Kohlhagen, S.W. The effect of exchange rate uncertainty on the prices and volume of international trade. Journal of International Economy 8, p.483-511, 1978.

Kenen, P.; Rodrik, D. Measuring and analysing the effects of short-term volatility in real exchange rates. Review of Economics and Statistics 68, 1986.

Klein, M.W. Sectoral effects of exchange rate volatility on United States exports.

Journal of International Money and Finance 9, p.299-308, 1990.

Lanyi, A.; Suss, E. Exchange rate variability: alternative measures and interpretation. IMF Staff Papers n. 29, p.527-560, 1982.

Linnemann, H. An econometric study of international trade flows. Amsterdam: North-

Holland, 1966.

Mark, N. Exchange rates and fundamentals: evidence on long-horizon predictability.

The American Economic Review 85, p. 201-218, 1995.

Maskus, K. Exchange rate risk and U.S. trade: a sectoral analysis. Federal Reserve Bank

of Kansas Economic Review 3, p.16-28, 1986.

Peree, E.; Steinherr, A.. Exchange rate uncertainty and foreign trade. European Economic

Review 33, p.1241-1264, 1989.

Pick, D.H. Exchange rate risk and U.S. agricultural trade flows. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 72, p.694-700, 1990.

Pick, D.H; Vollrath, T.L. Real exchange rate misalignment and agricultural export

performance in developing countries. Economic Development and Cultural Change 42, p.555-571, 1994.

Rose, A. One money, one market: the effect of common currencies on trade. Economic

Policy 30, p.7-46, 2000.

Sauer, C.; A. K. Bohara, A.K. Exchange rate volatility and exports: regional differences

between developing and industrialized countries. Review of International Economics 9 (1), p.133-152, 2001.

Schuh, G. E. The exchange rate and U.S. agriculture. American Journal of Agricultural

Economics 56, p.1-13, 1974.

Soloaga, I.; Winters, A. Regionalism in the nineties: What effect on trade? The North

American Journal of Economics and Finance 12, p.1-29, 2001.

Thursby, J.G.; Thursby, M.C. Bilateral trade flows, the Linder hypothesis and exchange

rate risk. Review of Economics and Statistics 69, p.488-495, 1987.

Tinbergen, J. Shaping the world economy. Twenty-Century Fund, New York, 1962.

Trefler, D. Trade liberalization and the theory of endogenous protection: an econometric

study of U.S. import policy. Journal of Political Economy 101 (1), p.138-160, 1993.

Tweeten, L. Farm policy analysis. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1989.

Wei, S.J. Intra-national versus international trade: How stubborn are nations in global

integration? NBER Working Paper n.5531, Cambridge, MA. NBER, 1996.

Downloads

Publicado

01-12-2007

Edição

Seção

Não definida

Como Citar

Bittencourt, M. V. L., Larson, D. W., & Thompson, S. R. (2007). Impactos da volatilidade da taxa de câmbio no comércio setorial do Mercosul . Estudos Econômicos (São Paulo), 37(4), 791-816. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-41612007000400004