Uma análise bibliométrica dos escritos e ideias de Thorstein Veblen
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-53575315falgPalavras-chave:
Thorstein Veblen, Periódicos mainstreaming, Periódicos ortodoxos, Periódicos heterodoxos, BibliometriaResumo
A obra de Thorstein Veblen foi um marco na ciência econômica norte americana no final do século XIX e início do século XX. Veblen é geralmente caracterizado como um dos fundadores do Institucionalismo Americano, corrente do pensamento econômico que competiu com a Economia Neoclássica no processo de mainstreaming da ciência econômica norte americana durante a primeira metade do século XX. Dado o enorme impacto dos escritos de Veblen na ciência econômica, é possível encontrar artigos econômicos mainstreaming que mencionam a contribuição de Veblen – portanto, ela não seria uma exclusividade da abordagem heterodoxa. O objetivo do nosso estudo é investigar como artigos publicados por periódicos heterodoxos e mainstreaming lidam com os escritos de Veblen. Nossa investigação é baseada em uma análise bibliométrica para identificar como as ideias econômicas de Veblen são mencionadas em artigos publicados pelos principais periódicos heterodoxos e mainstreaming. A bibliometria também é aplicada, em nosso artigo, para construir indicadores e analisar padrões.
Downloads
Referências
Aistleitner, Matthias; Kapeller, Jakob and Steinerberger, Stefan. 2019. “Citation patterns in economics and beyond” Science in Context, 32(4), 361-380.
Almeida, Felipe and De Paula, Luís. 2019. “The Place of Uncertainty in Heterodox Economics Journals: A Bibliometric Study” Journal of Economic Issues, 53(2): 553-562.
Anderson, Karl. 1933. “The Unity of Veblen’s Theoretical System” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 47(4), 598-626
Angrist, Josh; Azoulay, Pierre; Ellison, Glenn; Hill, Ryan and Feng Lu, Susan. 2020. “Inside Job or Deep Impact? Extramural Citations and the Influence of Economic Scholarship” Journal of Economic Literature, 58 (1): 3-52
Aria, Massimo and Cuccurullo, Corrado. 2017. “Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis” Journal of Informetrics 11(4): 959-975.
Arrow, Kenneth and Dasgupta, Partha. 2009. “Conspicuous Consumption, Inconspicuous Leisure” The Economic Journal 119(541): 497–516
Ayres, Clarence. 1944. The Theory of Economic Progress. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press
Ayres, Clarence. 1952. The Industrial Economy. Boston: Houghton Mifflin
Ayres, Clarence. 1961. Toward a Reasonable Society. Austin: The University of Texas Press
Backhouse, Roger. 2000. “Progress in heterodox economics” Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 22(2): 149-155
Backhouse, Roger. 2004. “A suggestion for clarifying the study of dissent in Economics” Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 26(2): 261-271
Basmann, Robert; Molina, David and Slottje, Daniel. 1988. “A Note on Measuring Veblen’s Theory of Conspicuous Consumption” The Review of Economics and Statistics, 70(3):531-535
Bagwell, Laurie and Bernheim, B. Douglas. 1996. “Veblen Effects in a Theory of Conspicuous Consumption” The American Economic Review, 86(3):349-373
Berle, Adolf and Means, Gardiner. 1932. The Modern Corporation and Private Property. New York: Commerce Clearing House
Boyd, Robert and Richerson, Peter. 1985. Culture and the Evolutionary Process. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press
Bronfenbrenner, Martin. 1985. “Early American Leaders--Institutional and Critical Traditions” The American Economic Review 75(6):13-27
Bush, Paul. 1987. “The Theory of Institutional Change” Journal of Economic Issues 21(3): 1075-1116
Cavalieri, Marco and Almeida, Felipe. 2015. “Institutionalists as Dissenters: Why Were Institutionalists So Dissatisfied with Economics During the Post-War Period” Journal of Economic Issues, 49(2): 475-482
Cavalieri, Marco and Almeida, Felipe. 2017. “A History of the Founding and Early Years of AFEE” Journal of Economic Issues 51(3):613-634
Clark, John Maurice. 1919. “Economic Theory in an Era of Social Readjustment” The American Economic Review, supplement, 9(1):280-90
Claveau, François and Gingras Yvesas, Y. 2016. “Macrodynamics of Economics: A Bibliometric History” History of Political Economy, 48 (4): 551–592
Coats, A. W. (Bob). 1954. “The Influence of Veblen’s Methodology” Journal of Political Economy 62(6):529-537
Coats, A. W. (Bob). 1985. “The American Economic Association and the Economics Profession” Journal of Economic Literature 23(4):1697-1727
Colander, David, Holt, Richard and Rosser Jr., J. Barkley. 2004. “The changing face of mainstream economics” Review of Political Economy 16(4): 485-499
Commons, John. 1924. Legal Foundations of Capitalism. New York: Macmillan
Commons, John. 1934. Institutional Economics. New York: Macmillan
Commons, John. 1950. The Economics of Collective Action. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press
Davis, Arthur. 1945. “Sociological Elements in Veblen’s Economic Theory” Journal of Political Economy 53(2): 132-149
Davis, John. 2008. “Heterodox Economics, the fragmentation of the mainstream, and embedded individual analysis” In: Harvey, John and Garnett, Ross. Future directions for heterodox economics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press
Davis, Lance and North, Douglass. 1971. Institutional Change and American Economic Growth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Denison, Edward. 1967. Why Growth Rates Differ. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution
Dequech, David. 2007. “Neoclassical, mainstream, orthodox, and heterodox economics” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 30(2): 279-302
Dorfman, Joseph. 1934. Thorstein Veblen and his America. New York: Viking Press
Dorfman, Joseph. 1949. The Economic Mind in American Civilization, vol. III: 1865-1918. New York: Viking Press
Dorfman, Joseph. 1958. “Source and Impact of Veblen” The American Economic Review, 48(2):1–10
Duesenberry, James. 1949. Income, Saving, and the Theory of Consumer Behavior. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Edgell, Stephen and Tilman, Rick. 1989. “The Intellectual Antecedents of Thorstein Veblen: A Reappraisal” Journal of Economic Issues 23(4): 1003-1026
Findlay, Ronald. 1978. “Relative Backwardness, Direct Foreign Investment, and the Transfer of Technology: A Simple Dynamic Model” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 92(1):1-16
Fourcade, Marion, Ollion, Etienne and Algan, Yann. 2015. “The Superiority of Economists” The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29(1): 89–113
Fusfeld, Daniel. 1973. “Types of Radicalism in American Economics” The American Economic Review 63(2):145-151
Friedman, Milton. 1953a. “The Methodology of Positive Economics” in Essays in Positive Economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Friedman, Milton. 1953b. “Essays in Positive Economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Galbraith, John. 1967. The New Industrial State. Boston: Houghton Mifflin
Galbraith, John. 1973. Economics and the Public Purpose. Boston: Houghton Mifflin
Gerschenkron, Alexander. 1962. Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective. Cambridge: Harvard university press
Gilman, Nils. 1999. “Thorstein Veblen’s Neglected Feminism” Journal of Economic Issues 33(3): 689-711
Gintis, Hebert. 1971. “Education, Technology, and the Characteristics of Worker Productivity” The American Economic Review 61(2): 266-279
Glötzl, Florentin and Aigner, Ernest. 2018. “Orthodox Core–Heterodox Periphery? Contrasting Citation Networks of Economics Departments in Vienna” Review of Political Economy, 30(2): 210-240
Granovetter, Mark. 1985. “Economic Action and Social Structure: the Problem of Embeddedness” American Journal of Sociology, 91(3): 481-510
Gruchy, Allan. 1947. Modern Economic Thought: The American Contribution. New York: Prentice-Hall
Gruchy, Allan. 1958. “The Influence of Veblen on Mid-Century Institutionalism” The American Economic Review, 48(2):11–20
Gruchy, Allan. 1972. Contemporary Economic Thought: the Contribution of the Neo-Institutional Economics. New York: Kelley
Hamilton, Walton. 1919. “The Institutional Approach to Economic Theory” The American Economic Review 9 (1):309–318
Harris, Abram. 1951. Veblen and the Social Phenomenon of Capitalism. The American Economic Review 41(2):66-77
Hayakawa, Hiroaki and Venieris, Yiannis. 1977. “Consumer Interdependence via Reference Groups” Journal of Political Economy 85(3): 599-615
Hodgson, Geoffrey. 1992. “Thorstein Veblen and post-Darwinian economics” Cambridge Journal of Economics 16(3): 285-301
Hodgson, Geoffrey. 1993. Economics and Evolution: Bringing Back Life into Economics. Cambridge: Polity Press
Hodgson, Geoffrey. 1998a. “The Approach of Institutional Economics” Journal of Economic Literature 36(1):166-192
Hodgson, Geoffrey. 1998b. “On the evolution of Thorstein Veblen’s evolutionary economics” Cambridge Journal of Economics, 22(4):415-431
Hodgson, Geoffrey. 2001. How Economics Forgot History: The Problem of Historical Specifi city in Social Science. London and New York: Routledge
Hodgson, Geoffrey. 2004. The Evolution of Institutional Economics: Agency, Structure and Darwinism in American Institutionalism. London and New York: Routledge.
Hodgson, Geoffrey and Lamberg, Juha-Antti. 2018. “The past and future of evolutionary economics: some reflections based on new bibliometric evidence” Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review 15: 167–187
Homan, Paul. 1932. “An Appraisal of Institutional Economics” The American Economic Review 22(1):10-17
Jevons, William Stanley. 1871. “The Theory of Political Economy”. London: Macmillan & Co.
Karni, Edi and Schmeidler, David. 1990. “Fixed Preferences and Changing Tastes” The American Economic Review 80(2):262-267
Kaufman, Bruce. 2017. “The origins and theoretical foundation of original institutional economics reconsidered” Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 39(3):293-322
Keynes, John Maynard. 1936. The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. London: Macmillan
Kuhn, Thomas. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press
Lange, Oscar and Taylor, Fred M. 1938. On the Economic Theory of Socialism. Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press
Lee, Fred. 2012. “Heterodox economics and its critics” Review of Radical Political Economics, 24(2): 337-351
Lee, Fred and Cronin, Bruce. 2010. “Research Quality Rankings of Heterodox Economics Journals in a Contested Discipline” American Journal of Economics and Sociology 69(5): 1409-1452
Leibenstein, Harry. 1950. “Bandwagon, Snob, and Veblen Effects in the Theory of Consumers’ Demand” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 64(2):183–207
Luttmer, Erzo. 2005. “Neighbors as Negatives: Relative Earnings and Well-Being” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 120(3): 963–1002
Mandel, Benjamin R. 2009. “Art as an Investment and Conspicuous Consumption Good” The American Economic Review 99(4): 1653–1663
Marshall, Alfred. 1890 [1891]. Principles of Economics. London: Macmillan
Mata, Thiago. 2014. Dissent in Economics: Making Radical Political Economics and Post Keynesian Economics, 1960-1980. Ann Arbor: ProQuest LLC
Mayhew, Anne. 1987; “The Beginnings of Institutionalism” Journal of Economic Issues 21(3); 971-998
McCloskey, Deirdre. 2000. How to be Human–Though an Economist. Michigan: the University of Michigan Press
Mearman, Andrew. 2011. “Who do heterodox economists think they are?” American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 70(2): 480-510
Morgan, Mary and Rutherford, Malcolm. 1998. “American Economics: The Character of the Transformation” History of Political Economy 30 (5):1-16
Nelson, Richard and Winter, Sidney. 1982. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge: Harvard University Press
Ogburn, William. 1919. “The Psychological Basis for the Economic Interpretation of History” The American Economic Review, 9(1):291–305
Persky, Joseph. 2000. “The Neoclassical Advent: American Economics at the Dawn of the 20th Century” The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(1): 95-108
Pieters, Rik and Baumgartner. Hans. 2002. “Who Talks to Whom? Intra- and Interdisciplinary Communication of Economics Journals.” Journal of Economic Literature, 40 (2): 483-509
Piore, Michael and C. F. Sable, Charles. 1984. The Second Industrial Divide. New York: Basic Books
Polanyi, Karl. 1944. The Great Transformation. New York: Rinehart
Rosenberg, Nathan and Birdzell, L. E. 1986. How the West Grew Rich: The Economic Transformation of The Industrial World. New York: Basic Books
Rutherford, Malcolm. 1997. “American Institutionalism and the History of Economics” Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 19(2):178–95
Rutherford, Malcolm. 1998. “Veblen’s evolutionary programme: A promise unfulfilled” Cambridge Journal of Economics 22(4):463-477
Rutherford, Malcolm. 2011. “The Institutionalist Movement in American Economics, 1918-1947: Science and Social Control” New York: Cambridge University Press
Rutherford, Malcolm. 2015. “American Institutionalism After 1945” Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology 33: 95-123
Samuelson, Paul. 1946. “Foundations of economic analysis” Cambridge: Harvard University Press
Samuelson, Paul. 1974. “Rejoinder: Merlin Unclothed, A Final Word” Journal of Economic Literature 12(1):75-77
Scott, D. R. 1933. “Veblen Not an Institutional Economist” The American Economic Review, 23(2):274-277
Schaer, Philipp. 2013. “Applied informetrics for digital libraries: an overview of foundations, problems and current approaches.” Historical Social Research, 38(3): 267-281
Schumpeter, Joseph. 1934. The Theory of Economic Development. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press
Schumpeter, Joseph. 1942. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York: Harper and Brothers
Schumpeter, Joseph. 1954. History of Economic Analysis. London: Allen & Unwin
Sen, Amartya. 1977. “Rational Fools: A Critique of the Behavioral Foundations of Economic Theory” Philosophy and Public Affairs, 6(4): 317-44
Small, Henry. 197.) “Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 24(4): 265-269
Smith, Adam. 1776. The Wealth of Nations, Cannan, Edwin (Ed). London: Methuen and Co.
Solow, Robert (1956) “A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1):65–94
Stabile, Don. 1987. “Veblen and the Political Economy of Technocracy: The Herald of Technological Revolution Developed an Ideology of ‘Scientific’ Collectivism” The American Journal of Economics and Sociology
(1):35-48
Stewart, Walter. 1919. “Economic Theory—Discussion” The American Economic Review, 9 (1):319-20
Sweezy, Paul. 1958. “Veblen’s Critique of the American Economy.” The American Economic Review, 48(2):21–29
Teixeira, Aurora. 2014. “Evolution, Roots and Influence of the Literature on National Systems of Innovation: A Bibliometric Account.” Cambridge Journal of Economics, 38(1): 181–214
Tilman, Rick and Fontana, Andrea. 1985. “Italian Debate and Dialogue on Thorstein Veblen: The Evolution of Appreciation for His Contributions despite the Apathy of the Intelligentsia” The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 44(1), 81-95
Tool, Marc. 1979. The Discretionary Economy. Santa Monica: Goodyear Publishing
Van Eck, Ness and Waltman, Ludo. 2010. “Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping” Scientometrics, 84(2): 523–538
Van Eck, Ness and Waltman, Ludo. 2014. Visualizing bibliometric networks. In Y. Ding, R. Rousseau, & D. Wolfram (Eds.), Measuring scholarly impact: Methods and practice, p. 285-320, Springer
Vatter, Barbara. 1964. “Veblen, the Analyst and His Critics” The American Journal of Economics and Sociology 23(2):155-164
Veblen, Thorstein. 1898. “Why Is Economics Not an Evolutionary Science?” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 12(4): 373-97
Veblen, Thorstein. 1899. The Theory of the Leisure Class. New York: Macmillan
Veblen, Thorstein. 1904. The Theory of Business Enterprise. New York: Scribner
Veblen, Thorstein. 1909. “The Limitations of Marginal Utility” Journal of Political Economy, 17(9): 620–636
Veblen, Thorstein. 1914. The Instinct of Workmanship, and the State of the Industrial Arts. New York: B. W. Heubsch, Inc.
Veblen, Thorstein. 1915. Imperial Germany and the Industrial Revolution. New York: MacMillan
Veblen, Thorstein. 1919. The Place of Science in Modern Civilisation. New York: The Viking Press
Veblen, Thorstein. 1921. The Engineers and the Price System. New York: B. W. Heubsch, Inc.
Veblen, Thorstein. 1923. Absentee Ownership. New York: Viking Press
Veblen, Thorstein. 1934. Essays on Our Changing Order, Ed. L. Ardzrooni. New York: The Viking Press
Veblen, Thorstein. 1973. “Essays, Reviews, and Reports: Previously Uncollected Writings” Edited by Joseph Dorfman. Clifton, NJ: Augustus M. Kelley
Vukasin, Peter and Zinke, George. 1958. “Discussion” The American Economic Review, 48(2): 30–34
Walker, Donald. 1978. “New Light on Veblen’s Work and Influence” The American Journal of Economics and Sociology 37(1):87-101
Waller, William. 1982. “The Evolution of the Veblenian Dichotomy” Journal of Economic Issues, 16 (3):757-772
Waltman, Ludo, Van Eck, Ness and Noyons, Ed C.M. 2010. “A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks” Journal of Informetrics 4(4): 629–635
Weed, Frank. 1981. “Interpreting ‘Institutions’ in Veblen’s Evolutionary Theory” The American Journal of Economics and Sociology 40(1):67-78
Williamson, Oliver. 1985. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York: Free Press
Wrenn, Mary. 2007. “What is heterodox economics? Conversations with historians of economic thought” Forum for Social Economics 36(2): 97-108
Zacchia, Giulia. 2021. “What Does It Take to Be Top Women Economists? An Analysis Using Rankings in RePEc” Review of Political Economy, 33(2): 170-193
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2023 José Felipe de Almeida, Luis Gustavo de Paula
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
A submissão de artigo autoriza sua publicação e implica o compromisso de que o mesmo material não esteja sendo submetido a outro periódico.
A revista não paga direitos autorais aos autores dos artigos publicados.
O detentor dos direitos autorais da revista é o Departamento de Economia da Faculdade de Economia, Administração, Contabilidade e Atuária da Universidade de São Paulo.
Dados de financiamento
-
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Números do Financiamento 310398/2021-5
