State Violence and Weaving: implications of Aristophanes’ Lysistrata for Plato’s Statesman
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1981-9471.v15i1p18-34Keywords:
Lysistrata, Plato, StatesmanAbstract
This paper uses Aristophanes' Lysistrata to draw out the central violent tension of the weaving paradigm in Plato's Statesman. In the Lysistrata, weaving is offered as a metaphor for a tyrannical refashioning of the polis. In strikingly similar terms, the Eleatic Stranger of the Statesman proposes weaving as a metaphor for the best form of government. What is laughed off in the play, the characters of Plato's dialogue seem to take seriously. Through a comparative reading, I argue that the interpretations of the Statesman that take weaving as a paradigm for the best government of state, not only miss the comedy in the Stranger's discussion of statesmanship, but also the tragic allusions to tyranny. Furthermore, by drawing out the dialogue’s resonance with comedy, I conclude that the weaving paradigm succeeds in giving us a means for identifying tyranny in the Statesman; even when tyranny appears dressed up in a political science ostensibly formulated with the best of intentions.
Downloads
References
Arieti, A. James. 1991. Interpreting Plato: The Dialogues as Drama (Baltimore, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishing).
Aristophanes. 1926. Lysistrata. Lindsay, J. trans. (London, UK: Fanfrolico Press).
Aristophanes. 1994. Lysistrata. Crofts, T. ed. (New York, NY: Dover Publishing).
Aristophanes. 2000. Birds; Lysistrata; Women at the Thesmophoria. (Loeb Classical Library No. 179). Aristophanis Comoediae. Henderson, J. trans. (Oxford, UK: Oxford Classical Texts).
Aristotle. 2002. On Poetics, Benardete, S. and Davis, M. trans. (South Bend, IN: St. Augustine’s Press).
Barney, Rachel. 2001. “Platonism, Moral Nostalgia, and the ‘City of Pigs’.” Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 27(1): 207 – 27.
Blondell, Ruby. 2002. The Play of Characters in Plato’s Dialogues (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press).
Bossi, Beatriz and Robinson, M. Thomas. 2018. Plato’s Statesman Revisited (Berlin, De Gruyter).
Browning Cole, Eve. “Weaving and Practical Politics in Plato’s Statesman,” The Southern Journal of Philosophy 29(2): 195 – 208.
Burckhardt, Jacob. 1998. The Greeks and Greek Civilization (New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press).
De Chiara-Quenzer, Deborah. 1998. “The Purpose of Philosophical Method in Plato’s Statesman,” Apeiron 31(2): 91 – 126.
Figal, Günter. 2017. “On Dialectics in Plato’s Statesman.” The Plato’s Statesman: Dialectic, Myth, and Politics. Sallis, J. ed. (New York, NY: SUNY Press Publishing), 137 – 148.
Freydberg, Bernard. 1997. The Play of the Platonic Dialogues (Literature and the Sciences of Man) (New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing).
Freydberg, Bernard. 2008. Philosophy and Comedy: Aristophanes, Logos, and Eros (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press).
Hyland, A. Drew. 1995. Finitude and Transcendence in the Platonic Dialogues (New York: State University of New York Press).
Krell, David. 2015. “Talk to the Animals: On the Myth of Cronus in the Statesman.” Plato’s Animals: Gadflies, Horses, Swans, and Other Philosophical Beasts. Naas, M. ed. (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press).
Lane, S. Melissa. 1998. Method and Politics in Plato’s Statesman (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press).
Miller, Mitchell. 1980. The Philosopher in Plato’s Statesman (Boston, MA: Martinus Nijhoff Publishing).
Miller, Mitchell. 2017. “Nôesis and Logos in the Eleatic Trilogy, with a Focus on the Visitor’s Jokes at Statesman 266a-d.” The Plato’s Statesman: Dialectic, Myth, and Politics. Sallis, J. ed. (New York, NY: SUNY Press Publishing), 107 – 36.
Moore, G. Holly. 2016. “The Psychagogic Work of Examples in Plato’s Statesman,” Philosophy and Rhetoric 49(3): 300 – 22.
Nails, Debra. 2006. “Tragedy Off-Stage.” Plato’s Symposium: Issues in Interpretation and Reception. Lesher, H. J., Nails, D. and Sheffield, C. C. F. eds. (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
Olson, S. Douglas. 2012. “Lysistrata's Conspiracy and the Politics of 412 BC,” No Laughing Matter: Studies in Athenian Comedy. Marshall, W. C. and Kovacs, G. eds. (London, UK: Bristol Classical Press), 69 – 81.
Patterson, Richard. 1982. “The Platonic Art of Comedy and Tragedy,” Philosophy and Literature 6(1): 76 – 93.
Pender, E. Elizabeth. 2003. “Plato on Metaphors and Models,” Metaphor, Allegory, and the Classical Tradition: Ancient Thought and Modern Revisions. Boys-Stones, R. G. ed. (Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press), 55 – 81.
Plato. 1962. Plato with an English Translation: The Statesman; Philebus; Ion (Loeb Classical Library) Lamb, M. R. W. trans. (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
Plato. 1997. Philebus. Frede, D. trans. The Complete Works of Plato. Ostwald, M. ed. (Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing).
Plato. 1997. Statesman. Skemp, B. J. trans. The Complete Works of Plato Ostwald, M. ed. (Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing).
Plato. 2006. Statesman. Benardete, Seth. trans. The Being of the Beautiful (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press).
Risser, James. 2017. “The Art of the Example in Plato’s Statesman,” The Plato’s Statesman: Dialectic, Myth, and Politics. Sallis, J. ed. (New York, NY: SUNY Press Publishing), 171 – 182.
Rosen, Stanley. 1995. Plato’s Statesman: The Web of Politics (New Heaven, CT: Yale University Press).
Rowe, Cristopher. 1996. “The Politicus: Structure and Form,” Form and Argument in Late Plato. McCabe M. M. et al eds. (Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press), 153 – 78.
Sallis, John. 1975. Being and Logos: Reading the Platonic Dialogues. (Duquesne, PA: Pennsylvania University Press).
Sanday, Eric. 2017. “Paradigm and Dialectical Inquiry in Plato’s Statesman,” The Plato’s Statesman: Dialectic, Myth, and Politics. Sallis, J. ed. (New York, NY: SUNY Press Publishing), 149 – 170.
Sayre, M. Kenneth. 2006. Metaphysics and Method in Plato’s Statesman (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press).
Smith, C. Collin. 2018. “The Groundwork for Dialectic in Statesman 277a-287b,” The International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 12(2): 132 – 150.
Strauss, Leo. 1966a. Socrates and Aristophanes (New York, NY: Basic Books Publishing).
Strauss, Leo. 1996b. “The Origins of Political Science and the Problem of Socrates.” Interpretation 23(2): 129 – 206.
Vetter, P. Lisa. 2005. Women’s Work as Political Art: Weaving and Dialectical Politics in Homer, Aristophanes, and Plato (Oxford, UK: Lexington Books).
Vickers, Michael. 1997. Pericles on Stage (Austin, TX: University of Texas Press).
Vickers, Michael. 2015. Aristophanes and Alcibiades: Echoes of Contemporary History in Athenian Comedy (Boston, MA: Walter de Gruyter Publishing).
Wolz, G. Henry. 1963. Philosophy as Drama: An Approach to Plato’s Dialogues. International Philosophical Quarterly 3 (2): 236 – 70.
Wolz, G. Henry. 1970. Philosophy as Drama: An Approach to Plato’s Symposium. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 30 (3): 323 – 53.
Zuckert, H. Catherine. 2012. Plato’s Philosophers: The Coherence of the Dialogues (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC By 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
