La prueba incremental Shuttle walk realizada en el pasillo y la cinta caminadora

¿son intercambiables?

Autores/as

  • Cristiane Santos de Oliveira Universidade Nove de Julho (Uninove) – São Paulo (SP), Brasil
  • Anderson José https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3611-0098
  • Crislaine Oliveira Santos Universidade Nove de Julho (Uninove) – São Paulo (SP), Brasil
  • Cristiane Helga Yamane de Oliveira Universidade Nove de Julho (Uninove) – São Paulo (SP), Brasil
  • Thiago Cristiano Oliveira Carvalho Universidade Nove de Julho (Uninove) – São Paulo (SP), Brasil
  • Jaksoel Cunha Silva Universidade Nove de Julho (Uninove) – São Paulo (SP), Brasil
  • Jessyca Pachi Rodrigues Selman Universidade Nove de Julho (Uninove) – São Paulo (SP), Brasil
  • Rejane Agnelo Silva de Castro Universidade Nove de Julho (Uninove) – São Paulo (SP), Brasil
  • Anderson Alves de Camargo Universidade Nove de Julho (Uninove) – São Paulo (SP), Brasil
  • Simone Dal Corso https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9190-6796

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-2950/17008125042018

Palabras clave:

Prueba de Esfuerzo, Ejercicio, Caminata, Consumo de Oxígeno

Resumen

Se trata de una comparación del rendimiento en la prueba incremental shuttle walk llevado a cabo en el pasillo (SWPI-P) y en la cinta caminadora (SWPC) entre individuos sanos, para evaluar las respuestas fisiológicas durante las sesiones de entrenamiento aeróbico con velocidades estimadas en ambas pruebas. Estudio transversal con 55 individuos sanos. A los participantes se les eligieron al azar para realizar las pruebas con intervalo de 24 horas. Se llevaron a cabo sesiones de entrenamiento en la cinta caminadora con el 75 % de la velocidad obtenida en SWPI-P y en SWPC. Se incluyen entre las evaluaciones la distancia de la caminata, el consumo de oxígeno (VO2 ), la producción de dióxido de carbono (VCO2 ), la frecuencia cardiaca (FC) y la ventilación (VE). Hubo una diferencia significativa entre las distancias recorridas (SWPC: 823,9 ± 165,2 m y SWPI-P: 685,4 ± 141,4 m), pero similares a las respuestas fisiológicas del VO2 (28,6 ± 6,6 vs. 29,0 ± 7,3 ml-1.kg-1. min-1), VCO2 (1,9 ± 0,7 vs. ± 1,9 0,5 1), HR (158,3 ± 17,8 vs. 158,6 ± 17,7 bpm) y VE (41,5 ± 10,4 vs. 43,7 ± 12,9 1). Las velocidades estimadas fueron diferentes en las sesiones de entrenamiento (5,5 ± 0,5 km/h y 4,9 ± 0,3 km/h), así como VO2 , VCO2, VE y FC. Se concluyó que, en los adultos jóvenes sanos, la SWPI llevada a cabo en el pasillo y en la cinta caminadora no pueden ser intercambiables. Dado que la SWPC determinó una menor velocidad, la intensidad de entrenamiento de esta prueba puede subestimar las respuestas de un paciente en el entrenamiento aeróbico.

Descargas

Los datos de descarga aún no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

  • Cristiane Santos de Oliveira, Universidade Nove de Julho (Uninove) – São Paulo (SP), Brasil

    Postgraduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Universidade Nove de Julho (Uninove)

  • Anderson José

    Postgraduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Universidade Nove de Julho (Uninove)

  • Crislaine Oliveira Santos, Universidade Nove de Julho (Uninove) – São Paulo (SP), Brasil

    Postgraduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Universidade Nove de Julho (Uninove)

  • Cristiane Helga Yamane de Oliveira, Universidade Nove de Julho (Uninove) – São Paulo (SP), Brasil

    Postgraduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Universidade Nove de Julho (Uninove)

  • Thiago Cristiano Oliveira Carvalho, Universidade Nove de Julho (Uninove) – São Paulo (SP), Brasil

    Postgraduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Universidade Nove de Julho (Uninove)

  • Jaksoel Cunha Silva, Universidade Nove de Julho (Uninove) – São Paulo (SP), Brasil

    Postgraduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Universidade Nove de Julho (Uninove)

  • Jessyca Pachi Rodrigues Selman, Universidade Nove de Julho (Uninove) – São Paulo (SP), Brasil

    Postgraduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Universidade Nove de Julho (Uninove)

  • Rejane Agnelo Silva de Castro, Universidade Nove de Julho (Uninove) – São Paulo (SP), Brasil

    Postgraduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Universidade Nove de Julho (Uninove)

  • Anderson Alves de Camargo, Universidade Nove de Julho (Uninove) – São Paulo (SP), Brasil

    Postgraduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Universidade Nove de Julho (Uninove)

  • Simone Dal Corso

    Postgraduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Universidade Nove de Julho (Uninove)

Referencias

Parreira VF, Janaudis-Ferreira T, Evans RA, Mathur S, Goldstein

RS, Brooks D. Measurement properties of the incremental shuttle

walk test: a systematic review. Chest. 2014;145(6):1357-69.

doi:10.1378/chest.13-2071

Holland AE, Spruit MA, Singh SJ. How to carry out a field

walking test in chronic respiratory disease. Breathe (Sheff).

;11(2):128-39. doi:10.1183/20734735.021314

Probst VS, Hernandes NA, Teixeira DC, Felcar JM,

Mesquita RB, Gonçalves CG, et al. Reference values for the

incremental shuttle walking test. Respir Med. 2012;106:243-8.

doi:10.1016/j.rmed.2011.07.023

Lee AL, Hill CJ, Cecins N, Jenkins S, McDonald CF, Burge AT,

et al. The short and long term effects of exercise training in

non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis: a randomised controlled

trial. Respir Res. 2014;15:44. doi:10.1186/1465-9921-15-44

De Almeida FG, Victor EG, Rizzo JA. Hallway versus treadmill

-minute-walk tests in patients with chronic obstructive

pulmonary disease. Respir Care. 2009;54(12):1712-6.

Stevens D, Elpern E, Sharma K, Szidon P, Ankin M. Comparison of

hallway and treadmill six-minute walk tests. Am J Respir Crit Care

Med. 1999;160(5Pt1):1540-3. doi:10.1164/ajrccm.160.5.9808139

Revill SM, Morgan MD, Singh SJ, Williams J, Hardman AE. The

endurance shuttle walk: a new field test for the assessment of

endurance capacity in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Thorax. 1999;54(3):213-22. doi:10.1136/thx.54.3.213.

Fukuchi CA, Fukuchi RK, Duarte M. A public dataset of

overground and treadmill walking kinematics and kinetics in

healthy individuals. Peer J. 2018;6:e4640. doi:10.7717/peerj.4640.

Woolf-May K, Ferrett D. Metabolic equivalents during the 10-m

shuttle walking test for post-myocardial infarction patients.

Br J Sports Med. 2008;42(1):36-41.

Almodhy M, Beneke R, Cardoso F, Taylor MJ, Sandercock GR.

Pilot investigation of the oxygen demands and metabolic

cost of incremental shuttle walking and treadmill walking in

patients with cardiovascular disease. BMJ. 2014;16(4):e005216.

doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005216

Moloney ED, Clayton N, Mukherjee DK, Gallagher CG, Egan JJ.

The shuttle walk exercise test in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

Resp Med. 2003;97(6):682-7. doi:10.1053/rmed.2003.1501

WHO Expert. Committee physical status: the use and

interpretation of anthropometry. World Health Organ Tech

Rep Ser. 1995;854:1-452.

Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia. Diretrizes para testes

da função pulmonar. J Pneumol. 2002;28(Supl.3):S44-S58.

Rufino R, Costa CH, Lopes AJ, Maiworm AI, Maynard K,

Silva LM, et al. Spirometry reference values in the Brazilian

population. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2017;50(3):e5700.

doi:10.1590/1414-431X20175700

da Silva CA, Helal L, da Silva RP, Belli KC, Umpierre D, Stein

R. Association of lower limb compression garments during

high-intensity exercise with performance and physiological

responses: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med.

;48:1859-73. doi: 10.1007/s40279-018-0927-z

Spruit MA, Singh SJ, Garvey C, ZuWallack R, Nici L, Rochester

C, et al. An official American Thoracic Society/European

Respiratory Society Statement: key concepts and advances

in pulmonary rehabilitation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med.

;188(8):e13-e64. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201309-1634ST

Janaudis-Ferreira T, Sundelin G, Wadell K. Comparison of the

-minute walk distance test performed on a non-motorised

treadmill and in a corridor in healthy elderly subjects.

Physiotherapy. 2010;96(3):234-9. doi:10.1016/j.physio.2009.11.015

Swerts PM, Mostert R, Wouters EF. Comparison of corridor and

treadmill walking in patients with severe chronic obstructive

pulmonary disease. Phys Ther. 1990;70(7):439-42.

Beaumont A, Cockcroft A, Guz A. A self paced treadmill walking

test for breathless patients. Thorax. 1985;40(6):459-64.

Holland AE, Spruit MA, Troosters T, Puhan MA, Pepin V, Saey

D, et al. An official European Respiratory Society/American

Thoracic Society technical standard: field walking tests in

chronic respiratory disease. Eur Respir J. 2014;44(6):1428-46.

doi:10.1183/09031936.00150314

Arellano CJ, Kram R. The energetic cost of maintaining

lateral balance during human running. J Appl Physiol.

;112(3):427-34. doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00554.2011.

Ijmker T, Houdijk H, Lamoth CJ, Beek PJ, van der Woude LH.

Energy cost of balance control during walking decreases with

external stabilizer stiffness independent of walking speed. J

Biomech. 2013;46(13):2109-14. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.07.005

Meyns P, Bruijn SM, Duysens J. The how and why of arm

swing during human walking. Gait Posture. 2013;38(4):555-62.

doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.02.006

Yentes JM, Denton W, McCamley J, Raffalt PC, Schmid KK. Effect

of parameter selection on entropy calculation for long walking

trials. Gait Posture. 2018;60:128-34. doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.11.023

Berling J, Foster C, Gibson M, Doberstein S, Porcari J. The effect

of handrail support on oxygen uptake during steady-state

treadmill exercise. J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 2006;26(6):391-4.

Hoffmann CL, Dougherty C, Abkarian HK, Fox M, Juris PM.

The reduction of metabolic cost while using handrail support

during inclined treadmill walking is dependent on the handrail

use instruction. Int J Exerc Sci. 2014;7(4):339-45.

Foster C, Crowe AJ, Daines E, Dumit M, Green MA, Lettau S, et al.

Predicting functional capacity during treadmill testing independent

of exercise protocol. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1996;28(6):752-6.

McConnell T, Foster C, Conlin N, Thompson N. Prediction

of functional capacity during treadmill testing: effect of

handrail support. J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 1991;11:255-60.

doi:10.1249/00005768-198004001-00318

Berling J, Foster C, Gibson M, Doberstein S, Porcari J. The effect

of handrail support on oxygen uptake during steady state

treadmill exercise. J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 2006;26(6):391-4.

Wicks JR, Oldridge NB. How accurate is the prediction of

maximal oxygen uptake with treadmill testing? PLoS One.

;11:e0166608. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0166608

Descargas

Publicado

2018-11-12

Número

Sección

Pesquisa Original

Cómo citar

La prueba incremental Shuttle walk realizada en el pasillo y la cinta caminadora: ¿son intercambiables?. (2018). Fisioterapia E Pesquisa, 25(4), 395-403. https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-2950/17008125042018