The influence of dual-tasking on postural control in young adults

Authors

  • Morgan Lanzarin Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (Udesc) – Florianopólis (SC), Brasil
  • Patricia Parizzoto UDESC; Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina
  • Thiele de Cássia Libardoni UDESC; Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina
  • Larissa Sinhorim Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (Udesc) – Florianopólis (SC), Brasil
  • Graziela Morgana Silva Tavares UNIPAMPA; curso de Fisioterapia; Universidade Federal do Pampa
  • Gilmar Moraes Santos Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (Udesc) – Florianopólis (SC), Brasil

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.590/1809-2950/132405722012015

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of dual-tasking on postural balance in young adults. Participants were 20 college students (10 men and 10 women) with a mean age of 25 years. Postural balance was evaluated by the Sensory Organization Test (SOT), using the Smart Equitest(tm) NeuroCom(r) International, which evaluates the individual's ability to use the different systems of postural control (somatosensory, vestibular and visual) to keep in balance in the 6 conditions of sensory conflict presented by the system. The subjects were evaluated while single-tasking (maintaining balance) and dual-tasking (maintaining balance in conjunction with cognitive mental calculation task) in randomized order. Balance was measured by using the balance score, comparing the angular differences between the maximum anterior and posterior displacements. The Wilcoxon test with significance level of p(0.05 was used to compare the mean scores of balance between the situation with and without dual task. The balance scores in SOT conditions were analyzed and demonstrated statistically significant differences in condition 1 (eyes open, fixed platform and visual surroundings; p=0.018) and condition 6 (eyes open, platform swings and fixed visual surroundings; p=0.008), with reduced balance when dual-tasking in both conditions. The results showed that while performing dual tasks, consisted of four arithmetic operations, the posture control is negatively affected, resulting in a greater oscillation of the subjects. Thus, the complexity of the secondary task may have been the main reason for the lower balance scores found.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Schneider W, Fisk AD. Attention: theory and mechanism for skilled

performance. In: Magill RA, editor. Advances in psychology: memory and control of motor behavior. Amsterdam: North-Holland

Publishing Company; 1983. v. 12, p. 119-43.

Knutson KM, Mah L, Manly CF, Grafman J. Neural correlates of

automatic beliefs about gender and race. Hum Brain Mapp.

;28:915-30.

Pruszynski JA. Primary motor cortex and fast feedback responses

to mechanical perturbations: a primer on what we know now and

some suggestions on what we should find out next. Front Integr

Neurosci. 2014;8:72. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2014.00072

Bacsi AM, Colebatch JG. Evidence for reflex and perceptual vestibular contributions to postural control. Exp Brain Res. 2005;160:22-8.

Krishnamoorthy V, Latash ML, Scholz JP, Zatsiorsky VM. Muscle

synergies during shifts of the center of pressure by standing persons. Exp Brain Res. 2003;152:281-92.

Ting LH. Dimensional reduction in sensorimotor systems: a framework for understanding muscle coordination of posture. Prog

Brain Res. 2007;165:299-321.

Woollacott MH, Shumway-Cook A. Motor Control: Theory and

Practical Applications. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1995.

Woollacott MH, Shumway-Cook A. Attention and the control of

posture and gait: a review of an emerging area of research. Gait

Posture. 2002;16(1):1-14.

Kejonen P, Kauranen K, Ahasan R, Vanharanta H. Motion analysis

measurements of body movements during standing: association

with age and sex. Int J Rehabil Res. 2002;25:297-304.

Maylor EA, Wing AM. Age differences in postural stability are increased by additional cognitive demands. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc

Sci. 1996;51(3):P143-54.

Pellecchia GL. Postural sway increases with attentional demands of

concurrent cognitive task. Gait Posture. 2003;18:29-34.

Swan L, Otani H, Loubert PV. Reducing postural sway by manipulating the difficulty levels of a cognitive task and a balance task. Gait

Posture. 2007;26:470-4.

Olivier I, Cuisinier R, Vaugoyeay M, Nougier V, Assaiante C. Agerelated differences in cognitive and postural dual-task performance.

Gait Posture. 2010;32(4):494-9.

Strayer DL, Johnston WA. Driven to distraction: Dual-task studies of

simulated driving and conversing on a cellular telephone. Psychol

Sci. 2001;12:462-6.

Kemper S, Herman RE, Lian CHT. The costs of doing two things at

once for young and older adults: talking while walking, finger tapping, and ignoring speech or noise. Psychol Aging. 2003;18:181-92.

Tun PA, Wingfield A. Does dividing attention become harder with

age? Findings from the divided attention questionnaire. Aging

Neuropsychol Cognition. 1995;2:39-66.

Prado JM, Stoffregen TA, Duarte M. Postural sway during dual task

in young and elderly adults. Gerontology. 2007;53(5):274-81.

Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott MH, Kerns KA, Baldwin M. The

effects of two types of cognitive tasks on postural stability in older

adults with and without a history of falls. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med

Sci. 1997;52(4):M232-40.

Ross LM, Register-Mihalik JK, Mihalik JP, McCulloch KL, Prentice

WE, Shields EW, et al. Effects of a single-task versus a dual-task

paradigm on cognition and balance in healthy subjects. J Sport

Rehabil. 2011;20(3):296-310.

Olivier I, Cuisinier R, Vaugoyeay M, Nougier V, Assaiante C. Agerelated differences in cognitive and postural dual-task performance.

Gait Posture. 2010;32(4):494-9.

McCulloh K. Attention and dual-task conditions: Physical therapy

implications for individuals with acquired brain injury. J Neurol Phys

Ther. 2007;31(3):104-18.

Pashler H. Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory.

Psychol Bull. 1994;116(2):220-44.

Fisioter Pesq. 2015;22(1):61-68

Schmidt RA, Lee TD. Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral

Emphasis. 4. ed. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 2005.

Simpkins S, Zipp G, Siskal D. Researchers explore functional implications of multitask activities. Biomechanics Mag. 2004;11:55-9.

Brown LA, Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott MH. Attentional demands

and postural recovery: the effects of aging. J Gerontol A Biol Sci

Med Sci. 1999;54:M165-71.

Teasdale N, Stelmach GE, Breunig A. Postural sway characteristics

of the elderly under normal and altered visual and support surface

conditions. J Gerontol. 1991;46(6):B238-44.

Brauer SG, Woollacott M, Shumway-Cook A. The interacting

effects of cognitive demand and recovery of postural stability in

balance-impaired elderly persons. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci.

;56(8):M489-96.

Brauer SG, Woollacott M, Shumway-Cook A. The influence of a concurrent cognitive task on the compensatory stepping response to a

perturbation in balance-impaired and healthy elders. Gait Posture.

;15(1):83-93.

Hauer K, Marburger C, Oster P. Motor performance deteriorates

with simultaneously performed cognitive tasks in geriatric patients.

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83(2):217-23.

Hauer K, Pfisterer M, Weber C, Wezler N, Kliegel M, Oster P.

Cognitive impairment decreases postural control during dual tasks

in geriatric patients with a history of severe falls. J Am Geriatr Soc.

;51(11):1638-44.

Herman T, Mirelman A, Giladi N, Schweiger A, Hausdorff JM.

Executive control deficits as a prodrome to falls in healthy older

adults: a prospective study linking thinking, walking, and falling. J

Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2010;65(10):1086-92.

Kerr B, Condon SM, McDonald LA. Cognitive spatial processing and

the regulation of posture. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform.

;11(5):617-22.

Lajoie Y, Teasdale N, Bard C, Fleury M. Upright standing and gait: are

there changes in attentional requirements related to normal aging?

Exp Aging Res. 1996;22(2):185-98.

Ebersbach, G, Dimitrijevic MR, Poewe W. Influence of concurrent tasks on gait: A dual-task approach. Percept Mot Skills.

;81(1):107-13.

McIlroy WE, Norrie RG, Brooke JD, Bishop DC, Nelson AJ, Maki BE.

Temporal properties of attention sharing consequent to disturbed

balance. Neuroreport. 1999;10(14):2895-9.

Yardley L, Gardner M, Bronstein A, Davies R, Buckwell P, Luxon L.

Interference between postural control and mental task performance

in patients with vestibular disorder and healthy controls. J Neurol

Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2001;71:48-52.

Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott MH. Attentional demands and postural control: the effect of sensory context. J Gerontol A Biol Med

Sci. 2000;55(1):M10-6.

Marconi MDA, Lakatos EM. Técnicas de pesquisa: planejamento e

execução de pesquisas, amostragens e técnicas de pesquisa, elaboração, análise e interpretação de dados. 7. ed. São Paulo: Atlas; 2011.

McDowd JM. An overview of attention: behavior and brain. J Neurol

Phys Ther. 2007;31:98-103.

Meyer DE, Kieras DE. A computational theory of executive cognitive

processes and human multiple-task performance: Part 1. Basic

mechanisms. Psychol Rev. 1997;104(1):3-65.

Hunter MC, Hoffman MA. Postural control: visual and cognitive

manipulations. Gait Posture. 2001;13:41-8.

Resch JE, May B, Tomporowski PD, Ferrara MS. Balance performance with a cognitive task: a continuation of the dual-task testing

paradigm. J Athl Train. 2011;46(2):170-5.

Huxhold O, Li SC, Schmiedek F, Lindenberg U. Dual-tasking postural

control: aging and the effects of cognitive demand in conjunction

with focus of attention. Brain Res Bull. 2006;69(3):294-305.

Remaud A, Boyas S, Caron GAR, Bilodeau M. Attentional demands

associated with postural control depend on task difficulty and

visual condition. J Mot Behav. 2012;44(5):329-40.

Remaud A, Boyas S, Lajoie Y, Bilodeau M. Attentional focus influences postural control and reaction time performances only during

challenging dual-task conditions in healthy young adults. Exp Brain

Res. 2013;231(2):219-29.

Published

2015-03-03

Issue

Section

Original Research

How to Cite

The influence of dual-tasking on postural control in young adults . (2015). Fisioterapia E Pesquisa, 22(1), 61-68. https://doi.org/10.590/1809-2950/132405722012015