The enterprise design matrix (EDM): a conceptual model for design-insertion-level analysis on enterprise

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/gtp.v17i2.174943

Keywords:

Innovation routines, Innovation vector, Micro and small enterprises – MSEs

Abstract

Design is recognized as one of the activities that contribute to competitiveness gains in all enterprises’ scales. With the creation of the Brazilian Design Program (BDP/PBD) in 1995, measures of support to design initiatives took place, aiming to foment and insert the design inside the national productive sector. The objects of this article are the Micro and Small Enterprise (MSE/MPE), favored by such programs focused on design and aimed at competitively. In this paper, a hybrid methodology – that unifies qualitative research of exploratory basis (traditional scientific method) and Design Science Research (that resulted in an artifact, a conceptual model) – was used. Therefore, in this article, an Analytic Conceptual Model is described named Enterprise Design Matrix (EDM/MDE), which represents the design permeability level as a vector of routine-based innovation presenting, then, indicators that comprehend specificities of the MDEs that act on traditional, non-technological sectors. It is proposed that this conceptual model will contribute to the evaluation and identification of design levels as an innovation routines; Innovation vector; Micro and Small Enterprises – MSEs innovation vector at enterprises, MSEs, as well as assist to conceive future scenarios based on their management predisposition to innovate. Stands out that this conceptual model is made out of the author’s thesis and that this article presents its conceptual basis and how to use them. EDM usage can be consulted at the referred thesis.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Angela Xavier de Souza Nolasco, Federal University of Bahia, School of Fine Arts

    Graduated in Design within UNEB (1997), specialization in Product Design within UNEB (2006) and in Project Management within FGV (2009), masters in Management and Industrial Technology within SENAI Cimatec – EA/UFBA – ITA (2012), and a doctorate in Computational Modelling and Industrial Technology within SENAI Cimatec (2017). Is a Professor and Researcher of Design and Innovation at UFBA’s School of Fine Arts. Was a Design Professor at UFAL (2020-2021). Acts on the research groups “IDEA” (UFAL) and “Cognition, Knowledge and Innovation” (SENAI Cimatec). Was manager of ‘Via Design’, SEBRAE’s National Design Program in Bahia. Was coordinator of SENAI’s Graphic Design and Packaging Core for 10 years. Member of the Design Collective of Bahia (DCB/CDB). Researcher in Design Management, Strategic Design, and Design-Driven Innovation. Realized several projects on Graphic Design, Package Design, and Strategic Design.
    CV Lattes: http://lattes.cnpq.br/3744079132873538

  • Renelson Ribeiro Sampaio, Senai Cimatec University Center

    Post-Doctoral (2010/11), held at the Department of Sociology at the University of Wisconsin Madison with Professor Erik Olin Wright. PhD (1986) in Economics of Technological Innovation at the Science Policy Research Unit - SPRU, University of Sussex, England. Master (1979) in History and Social Studies of Science - University of Sussex, England. Postgraduate (1974-75) in Mathematical Physics – Brasilia University (UnB), and bachelor’s degree in Physics (1973) - Department of Physics at UFMG. Full Professor and researcher at the SENAI CIMATEC University Centre, Salvador/BA, acting as a permanent professor in the Professional Master's in Industrial Management and Technology, in the Doctorate in Industrial Management and Technology and in the master’s degree and Doctoral program in Computational Modelling and Industrial Technology. Research works on the following topics: Generation and diffusion of knowledge in innovation processes in organizations; Studies on the competitiveness of industrial clusters (Local Production Systems) based on System Dynamics methodology.
    CV Lattes: http://lattes.cnpq.br/1232912658971080

References

BEST, K. Design management: managing design strategy, process and implementation. Lausanne: Ava Book, 2006. 215 p.

BRAGA, M. F. The choice of design. From businesses’ conditions to businesses’ attitudes. The Design Journal, [S.l.], v. 20, n. 1, p. S635-S646, 28 jul. 2017. Informa UK Limited. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1353011.

BRASIL. Decreto de 09 de novembro de 1995. Criação do Programa Brasileiro do Design. Brasília, DF: Diário Oficial da União, 10 nov. 1995. Seção 1, p. 17963-17963.

BRASIL. Lei nº 9.276, de 09 de maio de 1996. Dispõe sobre o Plano Plurianual para o período de 1996/1999 e dá outras providências. Brasília, DF: Diário Oficial da União, 28 ago. 1996. Seção 1.

BROWN, T. Design Thinking: uma metodologia poderosa para decretar o fim das velhas ideias. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier, 2010. 249 p.

BROWN, T. Design Thinking. Harvard Business Review, Cambridge, v. 86, n. 6, p. 1-10, jun. 2008.

CENTRO BRASIL DESIGN (Brasília). Diagnóstico do Design Brasileiro. Brasília: CBD, 2014. 222 p.

CENTRO PORTUGUÊS DE DESIGN - CPD. Manual de gestão de design. Cidade do Porto: Porto Editora, 1997. 198 p.

CHRISTENSEN, C. M. The innovator's dilemma: when new technologies cause great firms to fail. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1997. 225 p.

COSTA, F. C. X.; SCALETSKY, C. C. Design Management & Design Estratégico: uma confusão conceitual?. In: CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE PESQUISA E DESENVOLVIMENTO EM DESIGN, 9., 2010, São Paulo. Anais [...]. São Paulo: Blucher, 2010. p. 560-569.

D'IPPOLITO, B. The importance of design for firms' competitiveness: a review of the literature. Technovation, [S.l.], v. 34, n. 11, p. 716-730, nov. 2014. Elsevier BV. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2014.01.007.

DANISH DESIGN CENTRE - DDC (Dinamarca). The Economic Effects of Design. [S.l.]: National Agency For Enterprise And Housing, 2003.

DANISH DESIGN CENTRE - DDC (Dinamarca). Design Ladder 2016. 2016. Disponível em: https://danskdesigncenter.dk/sites/default/files/pdf/design_ladder_2016_eng_0.pdf. Acesso em: 01 ago. 2020.

DANISH DESIGN CENTRE – DDC (Dinamarca). The Design Ladder: four steps of design use. Four steps of design use. Dinamarca. Disponível em: https://danskdesigncenter.dk/en/design-ladder-four-steps-design-use. Acesso em: 06 maio 2017.

DOSI, G. Association Sources, Procedures, and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation. Journal of Economic Literature, [S.l.], v. 26, n. 3, p. 1120-1171, set. 1988.

DRESCH, A.; LACERDA, D.; ANTUNES JÚNIOR, J. A.V. Design Science Research: método de pesquisa para avanço da ciência e tecnologia. Porto Alegre: Bookman, 2015.

DRUCKER, P. Inovação e espírito empreendedor: práticas e princípios. São Paulo: Cengage Learning, 2010. 378 p.

DZIOBCZENSKI, P. R. N. et al. Inovação através do design: princípios sistêmicos do pensamento projetual. Design e Tecnologia, [S.l.], v. 2, n. 03, p. 54-63, 31 dez. 2011. PGDesign / Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. http://dx.doi.org/10.23972/det2011iss03pp54-63.

FORNARI, V. C. B. et al. Atividades inovativas em indústrias de "baixa e média-baixa" tecnologias: um exame dos mecanismos de difusão da inovação. Nova Economia, [S.l.], v. 24, n. 1, p. 75-97, abr. 2014. FapUNIFESP (SciELO). http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0103-6351/1926.

GIL, A. C. Métodos e técnicas de pesquisa social. 6. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2011. 200 p.

HIRSCH-KREINSEN, H. et al. Low-Tech Industries and the Knowledge Economy: state of the art and research challenges. State of the Art and Research Challenges. 2003. Disponível em: http://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/bitstream/handle/document/10962/ssoar-2003-hirsch-kreinsen_et_al-low-tech_industries_and_the_knowledge.pdf?sequence=1. Acesso em: 10 maio 2017.

HIRSCH-KREINSEN, H. "Low-Technology": a forgotten sector in innovation policy. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, [S.l.], v. 3, n. 3, p. 11-20, 2008. SciELO Agencia Nacional de Investigacion y Desarrollo (ANID). http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/s0718-27242008000100002.

KOOTSTRA, G. L. The incorporation of design management in today’s business practices: an analysis of design management practices in europe. Rotterdam: The Hague and Inholland University, 2009. 64 p.

LASTRES, H. M. M.; PIMENTEL, G. Design em Arranjos e Sistemas de MPME - NT 1.7. Rio de Janeiro: Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, 2001. 20 p.

MINAYO, M. C. S.; DESLANDES, S. F.; GOMES, R. (org.). Pesquisa social:: teoria, método e criatividade. 34. ed. Petrópolis: Vozes, 2015.

MINISTÉRIO DO DESENVOLVIMENTO, INDÚSTRIA E COMÉRCIO EXTERIOR – MDIC (Brasil). Programa Brasileiro do Design: orientação estratégica PBD 2007-2012. [S.l.]: MDIC, 2007. 12 p.

MORAES, D. Metaprojeto: o design do design. São Paulo: Blucher, 2010. 228 p.

MOZOTA, B. B. Design management: using design to build brand value and corporate innovation. New York: Allworth Press, 2003. 281 p.

MURATOVSKI, G. Paradigm Shift: report on the new role of design in business and society. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, [S.l.], v. 1, n. 2, p. 118-139, 2015. Elsevier BV. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2015.11.002.

NELSON, R. R.; WINTER, S. G. An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1983. 437 p.

NOLASCO, A. X.S. Estudo Multi-Caso de Empresas de Micro, Pequeno e Médio Porte sob Análise do Nível de Inserção do Design. 2012. 92 f. Dissertação (Mestrado) - Curso de Gestão e Tecnologia Industrial, Faculdade Tecnologia Senai Cimatec, Salvador, 2012.

NOLASCO, A. X. S. O Design como vetor de inovação em empresas de pequeno e médio portes: uma proposta de modelo analítico conceitual. 2017. 100 f. Tese (Doutorado) - Curso de Modelagem Computacional e Tecnologia Industrial, Universitário Senai Cimatec, Salvador, 2017.

NOLASCO, A. X. S.; SAMPAIO, R. R. Práticas e Princípios Inovadores Empreendedores de Drucker aplicados à Escada do Design. In: XXII SIMPÓSIO DE ENGENHARIA DE PRODUÇÃO, 22., 2015, Bauru. Anais [...]. Bauru: UNESP, 2015. p. 1-12.

ORGANIZAÇÃO PARA COOPERAÇÃO E DESENVOLVIMENTO ECONÔMICO - OCDE. Manual de Oslo: diretrizes para coleta e interpretação de dados sobre inovação. 3. ed. [S.l.]: OCDE, 2004. 184 p.

ORGANIZAÇÃO PARA COOPERAÇÃO E DESENVOLVIMENTO ECONÔMICO - OCDE. Sic Rev. 3 technology intensity definition: classification of manufacturing industries into categories based on r&d intensities. [S.l.]: OCDE, 2011.

OWEN, C. L. Design Thinking: driving innovation. The Business Process Management Institute, Illinois, p. 1-5, set. 2006.

PASTORI, D. et al. Strategic management process design e o pensamento sistêmico: a emergência de novas metodologias de design. Strategic Design Research Journal, [S.l.], v. 2, n. 1, p. 11-23, 1 jul. 2009. UNISINOS - Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos. http://dx.doi.org/10.4013/sdrj.2009.21.03.

PAVITT, K. Sectoral patterns of technical change: towards a taxonomy and a theory. Research Policy, [S.l.], v. 13, n. 6, p. 343-373, dez. 1984. Elsevier BV. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(84)90018-0.

PENROSE, E. T. The theory of the growth of the firm. [S.l.]: Oxford Brasil Blackwell, 1959.

RAULIK, G. Panorama internacional das políticas de promoção e incentivo ao design. [S.l]: MDIC, 2006.

ROSENBERG, N. Inside the black box: technology and economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982. 304 p.

SHARING EXPERIENCE EUROPE - SEE. Evaluating Design: understanding the return on investment in companies, national industry, programmes & policies, econom. [S.l.], 2010.

TIGRE, P. B. Gestão da inovação: a economia da tecnologia no brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier Editora, 2006. 282 p.

VERGANTI, R. Design-driven innovation: mudando as regras da competição: a inovação radical do significado do produto. São Paulo: Canal Certo, 2012. 269 p.

VILADAS, X. Managing design for profits. Barcelona: Index Book, 2010. 221 p

Published

2022-06-28

Issue

Section

Papers

How to Cite

NOLASCO, Angela Xavier de Souza; SAMPAIO, Renelson Ribeiro. The enterprise design matrix (EDM): a conceptual model for design-insertion-level analysis on enterprise: . Gestão & Tecnologia de Projetos (Design Management and Technology), São Carlos, v. 17, n. 2, p. 261–275, 2022. DOI: 10.11606/gtp.v17i2.174943. Disponível em: https://www.revistas.usp.br/gestaodeprojetos/article/view/174943.. Acesso em: 19 may. 2024.