Comparative sem evaluation of three solvents used in endodontic retreatment: an ex vivo study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572008000100006Keywords:
Chloroform, Orange oil, Eucalyptol, Endodontic retreatmentAbstract
This study compared, by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), the efficacy of three solvents on the removal of filling materials from dentinal tubules during endodontic retreatment. Forty human maxillary canines with straight canals were prepared according to a crown-down technique and enlarged to a#30 apical file size, before obturation with gutta-percha and a zinc-oxide-eugenol based sealer. The samples were stored for 3 months before being randomly assigned to four groups: chloroform (n=10), orange oil (n=10), eucalyptol (n=10) and control (n=10). Solvents were applied to a reservoir created on the coronal root third using Gates Glidden drills. The total time for retreatment using the solvents was 5 minutes per tooth. Following retreatment the roots were split longitudinally for SEM evaluation. SEM images were digitized, analyzed using Image ProPlus 4.5 software, and the number of dentinal tubules free of filling material from the middle and apical thirds was recorded. No significant difference was found among the solvent groups regarding the number of dentinal tubules free of root filling remnants in the middle and apical root thirds (p>;0.05). However, the control group had fewer dentinal tubules free of filling material (p<0.05). Under the tested conditions, it may be concluded that there was no significant difference among the solvents used to obtain dentinal tubules free of filling material remnants.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2008-02-01
Issue
Section
Original Articles
License
Todo o conteúdo do periódico, exceto onde está identificado, está licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons do tipo atribuição CC-BY.
How to Cite
Comparative sem evaluation of three solvents used in endodontic retreatment: an ex vivo study . (2008). Journal of Applied Oral Science, 16(1), 24-29. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572008000100006