Luting glass ceramic restorations using a self-adhesive resin cement under different dentin conditions

Autores

  • Guilherme B Guarda State University of Campinas; Piracicaba Dental School; Dental Materials Division; Department of Restorative Dentistry
  • Luciano S Gonçalves University of Uberaba; Dental School
  • Américo B Correr State University of Campinas; Piracicaba Dental School; Dental Materials Division; Department of Restorative Dentistry
  • Rafael R Moraes Federal University of Pelotas; Dental School; Department of Restorative Dentistry
  • Mário A.C Sinhoreti State University of Campinas; Piracicaba Dental School; Dental Materials Division; Department of Restorative Dentistry
  • Lourenço Correr-Sobrinho State University of Campinas; Piracicaba Dental School; Dental Materials Division; Department of Restorative Dentistry

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572010000300008

Palavras-chave:

Dental bonding, Dental cements, Dental porcelain, Tensile strength

Resumo

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the bond strength of ceramic restorations luted using a self-adhesive resin cement (RelyX Unicem, 3M ESPE) under different dentin conditions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In the experimental groups, ceramic restorations were luted to bovine incisors with RelyX Unicem under the following conditions: [Dry dentin]: surface was dried using air stream for 15 s; [Moist dentin]: excess dentin moisture was removed with absorbent paper; [Bonding agent]: Clearfil SE Bond (Kuraray) self-etching adhesive system was previously applied to dentin. In the Control group, cementation was done using an etch-and-rinse adhesive (Excite DSC) and Variolink II resin cement (Ivoclar Vivadent). Photoactivation of the resin cements was performed with UltraLume LED 5 unit (Ultradent). The restorations (n=5 per group) were sectioned into beams and microtensile testing was carried out. Data were subjected to ANOVA and Tukey's test (p<0.05). Failure modes were classifed under Scanning Electron Microscopic (SEM) (x120 magnifcation). RESULTS: The bond strength was dependent on the moisture status of the dentin. Bond strength in the "dry dentin group" was signifcantly lower than that of all other groups, which showed similar results. A predominance of mixed failures was detected for the control group, while a predominance of adhesive failures was observed for the "bonding agent" and "dry dentin" groups. The "moist dentin" group presented predominantly cohesive failures within the luting material. The previous application of a self-etching adhesive showed no signifcant effect. CONCLUSIONS: Only excess dentin moisture should be removed for the cementation of ceramic restorations with self-adhesive resin cements.

Downloads

Os dados de download ainda não estão disponíveis.

Downloads

Publicado

2010-06-01

Edição

Seção

Artigos Originais

Como Citar

Luting glass ceramic restorations using a self-adhesive resin cement under different dentin conditions . (2010). Journal of Applied Oral Science, 18(3), 244-248. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572010000300008