Locomotor behavior of children from two to six years old over uneven terrain

Authors

  • Claudia Teixeira-Arroyo Universidade Estadual Paulista; Departamento de Educação Física; Laboratório de Estudos da Postura e da Locomoção
  • Erlane Aguiar Feitosa Universidade Estadual Paulista; Departamento de Educação Física; Laboratório de Estudos da Postura e da Locomoção
  • Lilian Teresa Bucken Gobbi Universidade Estadual Paulista; Departamento de Educação Física; Laboratório de Estudos da Postura e da Locomoção

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.19904

Keywords:

growth and development, perception, locomotion

Abstract

The locomotor behavior of 25 children (from two to six years old) was observed during walking on an obstacle circuit under normal and reduced illumination. Participants were instructed to walk as fast as possible avoiding the contact with the obstacles. Two dependent variables were collected: success rate and time spent to complete the task. The two-way ANOVAs (5 age groups) x (2 illumination), with repeated measures on the last factor revealed only group main effect for success rate (F4,20= 9.975; p=0.001), lower for 2 years old children than for the other age groups; and for time spent to complete the task (F4,20=3.136; p=0.037), higher for 2 years old children than for 4 and 6 years old. Multiple regression analysis (stepwise) revealed that: chronological age, age group, walking experience, and time spent to complete the task predicted 75.3% of the success rate; and success rate was the only variable that predicted the spent time (R²=0.372; p=0.001). These results allowed us to conclude that developmental variables interfere on the locomotor behavior in an obstacle circuit and that illumination levels were not sufficient to disturb locomotion.

References

Chang C-L, Kubo M, Buzzi U, Ulrich B. Early changes in muscle activation patterns of toddlers during walking. Infant Behavior and Development. 2006;29(2): 175-88.

Joh AS, Adolph KE. Learning from falling. Child Dev.2006; 77(1): 89-102.

Holt KG, Saltzman E, Ho C-L, Kubo M, Ulrich BD. Discovery of the pendulum and spring dynamics in the early stages of walking. J Motor Behav. 2006; 38(3):206-18.

Holt KG, Saltzman E, Ho C-L, UlrichBD. Scaling of dynamics in the earliest stages of walking. Phys Ther. 2007;87(11): 1458-67.

Haywood KM, Getchell N. Desenvolvimento motor ao longo da vida. 3 ed. Porto Alegre: Artmed; 2004.

Adolph KE, Berger SA. Motor development. In: Damon W, Lerner R, series editors; Kuhn D, Siegler RS, volume editors. Handbook of child psychology: cognition, perception, and language. 6th ed. New York: Wiley;2006; v. 2. p. 161-213.

Leardini A, Sawacha Z, Paolini G, Ingrosso S, Nativo R, Benedetti MG. Anew anatomically based protocol for gait analysis in children. Gait Posture. 2007;26(4): 560-71.

Winter DA. Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley-Interscience; 1990.

Bril B, Ledebt A. Head coordination as a mean to assist sensory integration in learning to walk. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1998; 22(4): 555-63.

Gobbi LTB, Patla AE. Desenvolvimento da locomoção em terrenos irregulares: proposta de um modelo teórico. In: Pellegrini AM, organização. Coletânea de Estudos: comportamento motor I. São Paulo: Movimento; 1997. p. 29-44.

Gobbi LTB, Silva JJ, Paiva ACS, Scabello PL. Comportamento locomotor de crianças e adultos jovens em ambiente doméstico simulado. Psic: Teor Pesq. 2007; 23(3): 273-8.

Patla AE. Understanding the roles of vision in the control of human locomotion. Gait Posture. 1997; 5(1):54-69.

Heath M, Rival C, Neely K, Krigolson O. Müller-Lyer figures influence the online reorganization of visually guided grasping movements. Exp Brain Res.2006; 169(4): 473-81.

Rhea CK, Rietdyk S. Visual exteroceptive information provided during obstacle crossing did not modify the lower limb trajectory. Neurosci Lett. 2007; 418(1): 60-5.

Mohagheghi AA, Moraes R, Patla AE. The effects of distant and on-line visual information on the control of approach phase and step over an obstacle during locomotion. Exp Brain Res. 2004;155(4): 459-68.

Zernicke RF, Schneider K, Buford JA. Intersegmental Dynamics During Gait: Implications for Control. In: Patla AE. Adaptability of Human Gait. North-Holland: Elsevier Science Publishers BV; 1991. p. 187-202.

Kandel ER, Schwartz JH, Jessell TM. As Sensações Corporais. In: Kandel ER, Schwartz JH, Jessell TM. Princípios da Neurociência. 4 ed. Baruerí, SP: Manole; 2003. p. 430-50.

Patla AE, Vickers JN. How far ahead do we look when required to step on specific locations in the travel path during locomotion? Exp Brain Res.2003; 148(1): 133-8.

Lu TW, Chen HL, Chen SC. Comparisons of the lower limb kinematics between young and older adults when crossing obstacles of different heights. Gait Posture. 2006;23(4): 471-9.

Jordan K, Challis JH, Newell KM. Walking speed influences on gait cycle variability. Gait Posture.2007; 26: 128-34.

Fuller JR, Adkin AL, Vallis LA. Strategies used by older adults to change travel direction. Gait Posture. 2007; 25:393-400.

Soares IC. Efeitos da natação de bebê sna locomoção em ambiente complexo[trabalho de conclusão de curso]. Rio Claro, SP: Instituto de Biociências -Universidade Estadual Paulista; 1997.

Lima CB. Equilíbrio dinâmico: influência das restrições ambientais [trabalho de conclusão de curso]. Rio Claro, SP: Instituto de Biociências -Universidade Estadual Paulista; 1999.

Cohen J, Cohen P. Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale: Lawrence; 1983.

Paiva ACS, Gobbi LTB. Efeitos da experiência motora no desempenho locomotor em tarefa da vida diária[resumo expandido]. In: Anais do II Seminário De Comportamento Motor. São Paulo: Laboratório de Comportamento Motor - Faculdade de Educação Física e Esportes da USP; 2000. p. 126.

Blanchard Y, Mcveigh R, Graham M, Cadet M, Mwilambwe K, Scott C. The influence of ambient lighting levels on postural sway in healthy children. Gait Posture. 2007; 26(3): 442-5.

Berard JR, Vallis LA. Characteristics of single and double obstacle avoidance. Exp Brain Res. 2006; 175(1): 21-31.

Elliott DB, Patla AE, Furniss M, Adkin A. Improvements in clinical and functional vision and quality of life aftersecond eye cataract surgery. Optom VisSci. 2000; 77(1): 13-24.

Gobbi LTB, Menuchi MRTP, Uehara ET, Silva JJ. Influência da informação exproprioceptiva em tarefa locomotora com alta demanda de equilíbrio em crianças. Revista Brasileira de Ciência e Movimento. 2003; 11(4): 79-86.

Clark JE, Whitall J. What is motor development? The lessons of history. Quest. 1989; 41(3): 183-202.

Gabbard C. Lifelong Motor Development. 3rd ed. San Francisco: Benjamin Cummings, 2000.

Sutherland D. The development of mature gait. Gait Posture. 1997; 6(2):163-70.

Assaiante C. Development of locomotor balance control in healthy children. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1998; 22(4):527-32.

Ledebt A. Changes in arm posture during the early acquisition of walking. Infant Behavior and Development. 2000;23(1): 79-89.

Fitts PM. Cognitive Aspects of Information Processing: III. Set for speed versus accuracy. J Exp Psychol.1966; 71(6): 849-57.

Schmidt RA, Wrisberg CA. Motor Learning and Performance: a problem-based learning approach. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 2000. p.338.

Downloads

Published

2009-04-01

Issue

Vol. 19 No. 1 (2009)

Section

Original Research

License

CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL  PUBLISHERS

 

Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:

 

Publishers should:

 

  • Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
  • Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
  • Protect intellectual property and copyright
  • Foster editorial independence

 

Publishers should work with journal editors to:

 

  • Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:

–         Editorial  independence

–         Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research

–         Authorship

–         Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards

–         Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor

–         Appeals and complaints

  • Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
  • Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
  • Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
  • Maintain the integrity of the academic record
  • Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
  • Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
  • Publish content on a timely basis