Network is a lot of holes tied by strings
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.19946Keywords:
psychotic criminal, criminal lunatic asylum, cross sector network policies, responsibility, PAI-PJAbstract
The present article proposes a criticism of the mechanism to maintain the criminal lunatic asylum. It proposes the superation of this institutionthrough the association of a cross sector network opened in the city, considering the capacity and the responsibility of those subjects mentioned as psychotic criminals.References
Barros-Brisset FO. Gênese do conceito de periculosidade (Tese de doutorado). Belo Horizonte: UFMG. 2009.
Barros-Brisset FO. Por uma política de atenção integral ao louco infrator. Contribuições a partir da experiência do PAI-PJ. Belo Horizonte: TJMG. 2009.
Basaglia F. A Instituição Negada. Rio de Janeiro: Graal, 2001.
Foucault, M. Os Anormais. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2001.
Garcia C. A clinica do social. Belo Horizonte: Editora Projeto. 2000.
Jornal do Federal. Manicômio Judiciário... o pior. Brasília: CFP. 2000.
Miller JA. Rien n’est plus humain que lecrime. Paris: ECF. Revue Mental, 2008. n.21.
Ministério da Saúde/Ministério da Justiça. Seminário Nacional de Reorientação dos Hospitais de Custódia e Tratamento Psiquiátrico: Relatório Final. Brasília: setembro de 2002.
Rosa JG. Tutaméia. Rio de Janeiro: Nova Fronteira, 1985.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL PUBLISHERS
Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:
- Follow this code, and encourage the editors they work with to follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Edi- tors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf)
- Ensure the editors and journals they work with are aware of what their membership of COPE provides and en- tails
- Provide reasonable practical support to editors so that they can follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Editors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf_)
Publishers should:
- Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
- Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
- Protect intellectual property and copyright
- Foster editorial independence
Publishers should work with journal editors to:
- Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:
– Editorial independence
– Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research
– Authorship
– Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards
– Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor
– Appeals and complaints
- Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
- Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
- Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
- Maintain the integrity of the academic record
- Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
- Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
- Publish content on a timely basis
