DO YOU KNOW YOUR CHILDREN? ANALYSIS OF A MEDIA DISCOURSE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.38381Keywords:
media, discourse, drugs, childrem adolescents.Abstract
The purpose oithis paperwas to analyse a media discourse about tlte life of children and adoleseettt. The main eoncepts used in the analysis were the ones of central idea and aneltorage The following central ideas and anchorages were found:I ) central ideas
- thc youth’s double life
- the naturalization of the drug
- the dialogue as action and as a limits for the youth’s ransom
2) anchorages
- the conflict of generations
- the drug as facilitator of sociability
- the development of moral intelligenee as a eondition for the ransom of the youth’s social life a scgment of the reportage, entitled “Whattodo when” was also analyzed, revealing a process of translonnation of an authoriiy discourse into an authoritarian discoursc.
References
Fausto Neto A. O Impeachment da televisão. Como se cassa um Presidente. Rio de Janeiro, Diadorin Editora. 1995.
Simioni AMC, Lefèvre F, Bicudo Fereira IMT. Metodologia qualitativa nas pesquisas em saúde coletiva: considerações teóticas e instrumentais. São Paulo, Faculdade de Saúde Pública da USP/Departamento de Prática de Saúde Pública. Série Monográfica N° 2, 1996.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL PUBLISHERS
Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:
- Follow this code, and encourage the editors they work with to follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Edi- tors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf)
- Ensure the editors and journals they work with are aware of what their membership of COPE provides and en- tails
- Provide reasonable practical support to editors so that they can follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Editors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf_)
Publishers should:
- Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
- Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
- Protect intellectual property and copyright
- Foster editorial independence
Publishers should work with journal editors to:
- Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:
– Editorial independence
– Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research
– Authorship
– Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards
– Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor
– Appeals and complaints
- Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
- Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
- Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
- Maintain the integrity of the academic record
- Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
- Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
- Publish content on a timely basis
