HEALTH-SICKNESS REPRESENTATIONS OF A GROUP OF WOMEN FROM THE OUTSKIRTS OF BELO HORIZONTE (1994-1996)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.38382Keywords:
social representations, health-sickness process, health-sickness conception.Abstract
This paper is a result of a field research based on qualitative data, carried out with a group of women living at Solimões and Conjunto Jardim Felicidade neighborhoods, in themetropolitan arca of Belo Horizonte - MG, with the goal of identifying their representations ofthe health-sickness process. The data were collected througlh participative observation, semi-structured interviews and analyses of the interviews, according to the methodology proposed by BARDIN (1977), TRIVINOS (1987) and MINAYO (1993). The interviews, that lastedapproximately 60 minutes, were conducted from November, 1994 to July, 1995 with thirty women varying from 18
to 40 years of age, all of them with children between 0 and 5 years old. The analyses of the content of the interviews provided the categories of representation of the healtl^l-sickness process. Sickness is represented as funcional and utilitarian incapacity of the body. Health, besides beh^lg
represented as the contrary of sickness, in other words, a functional and utilitarian body, has yet many other representations, such as: a healthy lifestyle, qualified medical assistance, and also balanced and harmonious relations with nature and God. This study shows that these representations
are stricky related to the therapeutic alternatives adopted in the neighborhoods. Such alternatives, represented by scientific medicine, home medich^le, selfmedication, “blessings”, “witch doctors”, and miraculous cures are sought according to the conceptions of the health-sickness process.
References
Bardin L. Análise de conteúdo. Lisboa, Edições 70, 1977. p. 225.
Bastos EL, Telles PR, Castillo E, et al. A epidemia de AIOS no Brasil. ln: Minayo MG. Os muitos Brasis. Saúde e população na década de 80. São Paulo. Rio de Janeiro, Hucitec-Abrasco, 1995 p. 145-258.
Berlinguer G. A doença. São Paulo, Hucitec/CEBES. 1988.p.150.
Boltansky L. As classes sociais e o corpo. Rio de Janeiro, Grall, 1979 p. 191.
Borges SMN, Atiê E. Vida de mulher: estratégias de sobrevivência no cotidiano. In: Costa NR, Ramos CL, Minayo C, Stotz EN. Demandas populares, políticas públicas e saúde. Petrópolis, Vozes, 1989. V.2, p.165-184.
Herzlicih C. A problemática da representação social e sua utilidade no campo da doença. PHYSIS - Rev. Saúde Col. 1(2): 23-35,1991.
Koifman S. Incidência de câncer no Brasil. In: Minayo MC. Os muitos Brasis. Saúde e população na década de 80. São Paulo, Hucitec, 1975, p. 143-176.
Laplantine F. Antropologia da doença. São Paulo, Martins Fontes, 1991, p. 274. Lévi-Strauss C. Introdução à Obra de Marcel Mauss. In: Mauss M. Sociologiae antropologia. São Paulo, EPU/EDUSI’,1974. v. 2.
Loyola MA. A medicina popular. In: Gutmarães R. Saúde e medicina no Brasil: contribuição para um debate. Rio de Janeiro, Graal, 1978. v.3, p. 225-236
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL PUBLISHERS
Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:
- Follow this code, and encourage the editors they work with to follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Edi- tors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf)
- Ensure the editors and journals they work with are aware of what their membership of COPE provides and en- tails
- Provide reasonable practical support to editors so that they can follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Editors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf_)
Publishers should:
- Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
- Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
- Protect intellectual property and copyright
- Foster editorial independence
Publishers should work with journal editors to:
- Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:
– Editorial independence
– Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research
– Authorship
– Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards
– Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor
– Appeals and complaints
- Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
- Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
- Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
- Maintain the integrity of the academic record
- Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
- Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
- Publish content on a timely basis