Social representation of the hospital ludic: look of the child
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.81171Palabras clave:
play, child health, hospitalisation, social representationsResumen
Introduction: Play has become an object of study in various sectors of society, as it is viewed as an innate, spontaneous activity that is critical for a child’s physical, social, emotional and cognitive development, which facilitates communication, socialisation and adaptation to environments and people. During hospitalisation, children feel vulnerable as they have to cope with strange carers, invasive and painful procedures. Barriers to their regular activities tend to make the situation worse. Objectives: To describe the child’s view of his/her playfulness in the hospital environment and investigate the social representation of a hospital playroom for children exposed to the story-drawing technique. Methods: This qualitative exploratory research used storydrawing as a tool for data collection with a sample of 12 children aged 6 to 11 years, while they were hospitalised. Data analysis was supported by a literature review and direct observation, which allowed the researchers to draw relationships between theory, the research hypotheses and the data collected. Findings: The children’s construction and representation of playfulness while in hospital was directly related to the playroom, since most of them reported not conceiving of the possibility to play in bed or elsewhere in the hospital. Soon the playroom was further viewed as a place for socialising and recovering from illness as they approximated this environment to their reality in an attempt to make it a closest-as-possible representation of their homes. It was observed that play changed the children’s preconceived ideas of the hospital, as they began to view the playroom as an environment in which they felt able to play and consequently well. Their story-drawings contextualised symbolically their current hospitalisation situation and became a scaffolding tool for their emotional well-being. Conclusions: The playroom can effectively aid hospitalised children to cope better with the new situation and support the restoration of their health. Play is an emotionally protective factor for children during hospitalisation. Although in Brazil it is now mandatory for health institutions to have a playroom with paediatric care, this breakthrough policy is still challenging for some institutions with respect to being staffed with engaged health professionals and establishing routine procedures.
Referencias
Puga EMGR, Silva LSP. A brinquedoteca na escola: possibilidade do resgate do lúdico ou recurso da prática pedagógica. Aracaju, 2006. Disponível em: <http://lisane.pro.br. Acesso em: 03/03/2011.
Maluf ACM. Brincar – Prazer e Aprendizado. Petrópolis: Vozes, 2003. p 26-28.
Caldeira VA, Oliver FC. A criança com deficiência e as relações interpessoais numa brinquedoteca comunitária. RevBras Crescimento Desenvolv Hum 2007; 17(2):98-110.
Pérez-Ramos AMQ. O ambiente na vida da criança hospitalizada. In: Bomtempo E, Antunha EG, Oliveira VB. Brincando na escola, no hospital, na rua. 2.ed. Rio de Janeiro: Wak editora, 2008. p. 111-127.
Schlee AR. Brinquedoteca: uma alternativa espacial. In: Santos SMP. (Org.) Brinquedoteca: a criança, o adulto e o
lúdico.6.ed. Petrópolis, RJ: Vozes, 2008.p.12.
Brasil. Lei nº 11.104, de 21 de março de 2005. Dispõe sobre a obrigatoriedade de instalação de brinquedotecas nas unidades de saúde que ofereçam atendimento pediátrico em regime de internação. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, 22 mar. 2005.Seção 1, p. 1.
Brasil. Conselho Nacional de saúde. Resolução 196/96 Decreto n° 93.993 de janeiro de 1987. Estabelece critérios sobre pesquisa envolvendo seres humanos. Bioética. Brasília, v.4, n.2, suplemento, 1996.
Friedmann A. Brincar: crescer e aprender – O resgate do jogo infantil. São Paulo: Editora Moderna, 1996.p. 10-24.
Mitre RMA, Gomes R. A promoção do brincar no contexto da hospitalização infantil como ação de saúde. Ciênc. Saúde Coletiva, 2004; 9: 147-154.
Mussa C,Malerbi FEK. O impacto da atividade lúdica sobre o bem estar de crianças hospitalizadas. Psicologia: Teoria e Prática – 2008, 10(2):83-93.
Anninge A,Ring K. Os significados dos desenhos de crianças. Artmed. Porto Alegre, 2009.p. 131-147. Tradução Magda frança Lopes.
MartinsMR. As representações gráficas no brincar da criança hospitalizada. UDESC em ação.[periódico na internet] 2008 [Acesso em 04 setembro 2011]; 2(1):1-10. Disponível em: http://revistas.udesc.br/index.php/udescemacao/article/viewFile/1710/1351.
Quintana AM et al. A vivência hospitalar no olhar da criança internada. Cienc. Cuid.Saude. UEM. [periódico na internet] 2007 Out/Dez [Acesso em 15 abril 2011]; 6(4): 414-423,. Disponível em:<http://periodicos.uem.br.
Mérediu F. O desenho infantil.11. ed. São Paulo: cultrix, 2006.p.61-82.
MoreiraPL, Dupas G. Significado de saúde e de doença na percepção da criança. Rev Latino-am Enfermagem. 2003 novdez; 11(6): 757-762.
Fontes RS. O desafio da educação no hospital. Presença Pedagógica jul./ago. 2005; 11: 21-29.
Motta AB,Enumo SRF. Brincar no hospital: estratégia de enfrentamento da hospitalização infantil. Psicologia em estudo. [periódico na internet] 2004 jan/abr [Acesso em 18 outubro 2011]; 9(1):19-28. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/scielo. php?pid=S141373722004000100004&script=sci_arttext.
Ribeiro CR, Pinto Júnior AA. A Representaçãoocial Da Criança Hospitalizada: Um Estudoor Meio Do Procedimento De Desenho-Estóriaom Tema. Rev. SBPH.[periódico na
internet]2009[Acesso em 16abril2011];12(1):31-56. Disponivelem:http:// pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php? id=S1516&script=sci_arttext&tlng=pt.
Drummond I et al. A inserção do lúdico no tratamento da SIDA pediátrica.Análise Psicológica.[periódico na internet] 2009[Acesso em 08 setembro 2011]; 1(27):33-43. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.oces.mctes. pt/pdf/aps/v27n1/v27n1a03.pdf.
Melo LL, Valle ERM. A Brinquedoteca como possibilidade para desvelar o cotidiano da criança com câncer em tratamento ambulatorial. RevEscEnferm USP. [periódicona internet] 2010 [Acesso em 03 outubro 2011]; 44(2):517-525. Disponível em: www.ee.usp.br/reeusp.
Azevedo ACP. Brincar na brinquedoteca: crianças em situação de risco. In: Bomtempo E; Antunha EG; Oliveira VB. Brincando na escola, no hospital, na rua... 2.ed. Rio de Janeiro: Wak editora, 2008. p. 143-161
Oliveira LDB et al. A brinquedoteca hospitalar
como fator de promoção no desenvolvimento
infantil: relato de experiência. Rev Bras Crescimento Desenvolv Hum. 2009;19(2):306-312.
Sapienza G,Pedrômonico MR. Risco, proteção e resiliência no desenvolvimento da criança e do adolescente. Psicologia em estudo. [periódico na internet] 2005 mai/ago[Acesso em 15 outubro 2011];10(2):209-216. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/pe/v10n2/v10n2a07.pdf.
Pesce R et al. Risco e Proteção: em busca de um equilíbrio promotor de resiliência. Psicologia: Teoria e pesquisa.[periódico na internet] 2004 mai/ago[Acesso em 04 setembro 2011]; 20(2):135-143. Disponível em:http://www.scielo.br/pdf/ptp/v20n2/a06v20n2.pdf
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL PUBLISHERS
Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:
- Follow this code, and encourage the editors they work with to follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Edi- tors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf)
- Ensure the editors and journals they work with are aware of what their membership of COPE provides and en- tails
- Provide reasonable practical support to editors so that they can follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Editors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf_)
Publishers should:
- Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
- Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
- Protect intellectual property and copyright
- Foster editorial independence
Publishers should work with journal editors to:
- Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:
– Editorial independence
– Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research
– Authorship
– Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards
– Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor
– Appeals and complaints
- Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
- Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
- Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
- Maintain the integrity of the academic record
- Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
- Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
- Publish content on a timely basis