An inconvenient question: the idea of progress as a founding and structural concept of the scientific character of art history

Authors

  • Danielle Rodrigues Amaro USP

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/khronos.v0i4.131475

Keywords:

Art History, Art Historiography, Internalist and Externalist Concepts, Progress

Abstract

From issues raised by the art historian Alberto Cipiniuk about what he noticed as an uncertainty about the understanding and, consequently, the approach to the artistic phenomenon in the Brazilian academic context, it is intended to discuss the existing conflicts in art history between internalist and externalist, aesthetics and historical conceptions. As a consequence of the theme and in order to develop some questions, we bring to the center of the debate the thesis defended by the art historian Olga Hazan about the structuring role of the idea of progress in art history.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Danielle Rodrigues Amaro, USP
    Bacharel e licenciada em História da Arte pela Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ, 2002-2007). Mestre em Artes pela Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP, 2008-2010). Doutoranda em História Social pela Universidade de São Paulo (USP, 2013-) com o projeto de pesquisa A controversa institucionalização da História da Arte no Brasil [título provisório]. Integrante do GEPTEC - Grupo de Estudos do Progresso da Tecnologia e Ciência da USP. Tem experiência em educação em museus de arte, área na qual atual profissionalmente desde 2004. Nascida em Niterói (RJ), hoje vive, estuda e trabalha em São Paulo.

Downloads

Published

2017-09-11

Issue

No. 4 (2017)

Section

Artigos

License

Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License in the "Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International" (CC BY-NC 4.0) modality that allows sharing of the work with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.
  2. Authors are authorized to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (eg, publishing in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (eg in institutional repositories or on their personal page) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this can generate productive changes, as well as increase impact and citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
  4. Any doubts or complaints about copyright must be directed to the Editorial Board or qualify and express themselves in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publications Ethics (COPE).

 

How to Cite

Amaro, D. R. (2017). An inconvenient question: the idea of progress as a founding and structural concept of the scientific character of art history. Khronos, 4, 132-152. https://doi.org/10.11606/khronos.v0i4.131475