Risk factors for working in confined spaces: contributions for psychosocial assessment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-4327e3212Keywords:
Psychosocial factors, Working conditions, Occupational health, Occupational safety, Personnel managementAbstract
The recommendation of standards for companies supports the safety of workers. This study aimed to describe the psychosocial risk factors perceived by personnel that work in confined spaces. Qualitative study, conducted via interviews with 50 employees. Data were processed using the Interface de R pour les Analyses Multidimensionnelles de Textes et de Questionnaires software, with a descending hierarchical classification. The psychosocial risk management model identified five risk dimensions and described the interface between the categories of work context and content: interpersonal relationships (29.58%), task planning (23.50%), role in the organization (17.83%), home-work interface (15.10%), and workload and work pace (13.97%). The risk factors identified from the workers’' perspective allow reviewing psychosocial assessment, management practices, and the advancement of scientific knowledge, essential to rethink current legislation and mental health care for professionals that work in confined spaces.
Downloads
References
Araujo, L. K. R., & Oliveira, S. S. (2019). Mapping of psychosocial risks in the SAMU/DF. Psicologia: Ciência e Profissão, 39, 1-12. doi:10.1590/1982-3703003184126
Camargo, B. V., & Justo, A. M. (2013). IRAMUTEQ: Um software gratuito para análise de dados textuais [IRAMUTEQ: A free software for analyzing textual data]. Temas em Psicologia, 21(2), 513-518. doi:10.9788/TP2013.2-16
Carlotto, P. A. C., Cruz, R. M., Guilland, R., Rocha, R. E. R., Dalagasperina, P., & Ariño, D. O. (2018). Riscos psicossociais relacionados ao trabalho: Perspectivas teóricas e conceituais [Work-related psychosocial risks theoretical and conceptual perspectives]. Revista Interamericana de Psicologia Ocupacional, 37(1), 52-70. doi:10.21772/ripo.v37n1a04
Chirico, F. (2017). The forgotten realm of the new and emerging psychosocial risk factors. Journal of Occupational Health, 59(5), 433-435. doi:10.1539/joh.17-0111-OP
Conselho Federal de Psicologia. (2018). Resolução No. 9, de 25 de abril de 2018 [Resolution No. 9, of 25 April 2018]. Estabelece diretrizes para a realização de avaliação psicológica [Guidelines for carrying out psychological assessment]. Retrieved from http://crp11.org.br/upload/Resolu%C3%A7%C3%A3o-CFP-n%C2%BA-09-2018-com-anexo.pdf
Dias, F. M., Santos, J. F. C., Abelha, L., & Lovisi, G. M. (2016). O estresse ocupacional e a síndrome do esgotamento profissional (burnout) em trabalhadores da indústria do petróleo: Uma revisão sistemática [Occupational stress and burnout syndrome in oil industry workers: A systematic review]. Revista Brasileira de Saúde Ocupacional, 41, e11. doi:10.1590/2317-6369000106715
Eddy, P., Wertheim, E. H., Kingsley, M., & Wright, B. J. (2017). Associations between the effort-reward imbalance model of workplace stress and indices of cardiovascular health: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 83, 252-266. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.10.025
Fernandes, R. C. P., Assunção, A. A., & Carvalho, F. M. (2010). Tarefas repetitivas sob pressão temporal: Os distúrbios musculoesqueléticos e o trabalho industrial [Repetitive tasks under time pressure: The musculoskeletal disorders and the industrial work]. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 15(3), 931-942. doi:10.1590/S1413-81232010000300037
Jacinto, A., & Tolfo, S. R. (2017). Riscos psicossociais no trabalho: Conceitos, variáveis e instrumentos de pesquisa [Psychosocial risks at work: Concepts, variables and research instruments]. Revista Perspectivas em Psicologia, 21(1), 39-55. doi:10.14393/PPv21n1a2017-04
Kebe, N. N. M. K., Chiocchio, F., Bamvita, J. M., & Fleury, M. J. (2018). Variables associated with interprofessional collaboration: The case of professionals working in Quebec local mental health service networks. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 33(1), 76-84. doi:10.1080/13561820.2018.1515191
Leka, S., & Cox, T. (Eds.). (2008). PRIMA-EF: Guidance on the European framework for psychosocial risk management: A resource for employers and worker representatives. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/occupational_health/publications/PRIMA-EF%20Guidance_9.pdf
Leka, S., Jain, A., Cox, T., & Kortum, E. (2011). The development of the European framework for psychosocial risk management: PRIMA-EF. Journal of Occupational Health, 53(2), 137-143. doi:10.1539/joh.o10010
Ministério do Trabalho e Emprego. (2019). NR-33 Segurança e saúde nos trabalhos em espaços confinados [NR-33 Safety and health at work in confined spaces]. Retrieved from https://www.gov.br/trabalho-e-previdencia/pt-br/composicao/orgaos-especificos/secretaria-de-trabalho/inspecao/seguranca-e-saude-no-trabalho/normas-regulamentadoras/nr-33.pdf
Pereira, A. C. L., Souza, H. A., Lucca, S. R., & Igutti, A. M. (2020). Fatores de risco psicossociais no trabalho: Limitações para uma abordagem integral da saúde mental relacionada ao trabalho [Psychosocial risk factors at work: Limitations for a comprehensive approach to work-related mental health]. Revista Brasileira de Saúde Ocupacional, 45, e18. doi:10.1590/2317-6369000035118
Rodrigues, C. M. L., & Faiad, C. (2018). Avaliação psicossocial no contexto das normas regulamentadoras do trabalho: Desafios e práticas profissionais [Psychosocial assessment in the context of regulatory norms of work: Challenges and professional practices]. Psicologia Revista, 27(2), 287-310. doi:10.23925/2594-3871.2018v27i2p287-310
Rodrigues, C. M. L., & Faiad, C. (2019). Pesquisa sobre riscos psicossociais no trabalho: Estudo bibliométrico da produção nacional de 2008 a 2017 [Research on psychosocial risks at work: A bibliometric study of brazilian national production from 2008 to 2017]. Revista Psicologia Organizações e Trabalho, 19(1), 571-579. doi:10.17652/rpot/2019.1.15424
Silva, B. R., & Braga, E. S. (2020). Gestão de segurança e saúde do trabalhador em espaços confinados: Fluxograma das medidas necessárias para trabalho em espaço confinado (EC) [Worker safety and health management in confined spaces: Flowchart of measures required for work in confined spaces (EC)]. Revista Teccen, 13(2), 32-40. doi:10.21727/teccen.v13i2.2150
Souza, S. F., Carvalho, F. M., Araújo, T. M., & Porto, L. A. (2010). Psychosocial factors of work and mental disorders in electricians. Revista de Saúde Pública, 44(4), 710-717. doi:10.1590/S0034-89102010000400015
Souza, V. R. S., Marziale, M. H. P., Silva, G. T. R., & Nascimento, P. L. (2021). Tradução e validação para a língua portuguesa e avaliação do guia COREQ [Translation and validation into Brazilian portuguese and assessment of the COREQ checklist]. Acta Paulista de Enfermagem, 34, eAPE02631. doi:10.37689/acta-ape/2021ao02631
Vasconcelos, V. D., & Trentini, C. M. (2021). Avaliações psicossociais no trabalho no Brasil: Estudo de levantamento sobre variáveis, modelos teóricos, instrumentos, e critérios adotados [Psychosocial assessment at work in Brazil: A survey study of variables, theoretical models, instruments, and adopted criteria]. Revista Psicologia: Organizações e Trabalho, 21(1), 1355-1366. doi:10.5935/rpot/2021.1.20373
Zanelli, J. C., & Kanan, L. A. (2018). Fatores de risco, proteção psicossocial e trabalho [Risk factors, psychosocial protection and work]. Lages, SC: Editora da Uniplac.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The Editorial Board authorizes free access to and distribution of published contentes, provided that the source is cited, that is, granding credit to the authors and Paidéia and preserving the full text. The author is allowed to place the final version (postprint / editor’s PDF) in an institutional/thematic repositor or personal page (site, blog), immediately after publication, provided that it is available for open access and comes without any embargo period. Full reference should be made to the first publication in Paidéia. Access to the paper should at least be aligned with the access the journal offers.
As a legal entity, the University of São Paulo at Ribeirão Preto School of Philosophy, Sciences and Languages owns and holds the copyright deriving from the publication. To use the papers, Paidéia adopts the Creative Commons Licence, CC BY-NC non-commercial attribution. This licence permits access, download, print, share, reuse and distribution of papers, provided that this is for non-commercial use and that the source is cited, giving due authorship credit to Paidéia. In these cases, neither authors nor editors need any permission.
When deriving from research involving human beings, manuscripts need IRB approval, in compliance with the guidelines and standards of the Brazilian National Health Council Resolution 196/96 – Ministry of Health. Authors should attach the digital copy of the IRB declaration of approval, according to instructions displayed further ahead.
