Attachment to the Amazon rainforest: constitutive aspects and their predictors
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-4327e3128Keywords:
Environmental psychology, Amazon rainforest, Attachment behaviorAbstract
This investigation aims to contribute to the understanding of the attachment to the Amazon rainforest and its predictors, considering the dimensions that characterize this extensive environment. Five instruments were administered to 333 individuals of both genders, over the age of 18, from the cities of Ceres and Manaus, evaluating the Ecological Affinity profile; Attachment to the Amazon rainforest; Experiences in Nature; Knowledge of the Amazon rainforest; and Socioeconomic factors. The results confirm that attachment depends on the length of stay in the place. Data shows that the ecological affinity profile plays an important role in the attachment to a natural environment, suggesting that this relationship is strengthened by understanding the characteristics of this environment and its experiences. Based on the perspective of Environmental Psychology, this study advances knowledge on place attachment predictors and provides important arguments for the development of pro-environmental interventions focused on emotional and experiential aspects.
Downloads
References
Bailey, E., Devine-Wright, P., & Batel, S. (2016). Using a narrative approach to understand place attachments and responses to power line proposals: The importance of life-place trajectories. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 48, 200-211. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.10.006
Braun, T., & Dierkes, P. (2017). Connecting students to nature – how intensity of nature experience and student age influence the success of outdoor education programs. Environmental Education Research, 23(7), 937-949. doi:10.1080/13504622.2016.1214866
Breitenbecher, K. H., & Fuegen, K. (2019). Nature and exercise interact to influence perceived restorativeness. Ecopsychology, 11(1), 33-42. doi:10.1089/eco.2018.0056
Devine-Wright, P., & Batel, S. (2017). My neighbourhood, my country or my planet? The influence of multiple place attachments and climate change concern on social acceptance of energy infrastructure. Global Environmental Change, 47, 110-120. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.08.003
Fischer, G. (1994). Psicologia social do ambiente [Environmental social psychology]. Lisboa, Portugal: Instituto Piaget.
Gifford, R. D., & Chen, A. K. S. (2017). Why aren’t we taking action? Psychological barriers to climate-positive food choices. Climatic Change, 140(2), 165-178. doi:10.1007/s10584-016-1830-y
Gifford, R. D., & Nilsson, A. (2014). Personal and social factors that influence pro-environmental concern and behaviour: A review. International Journal of Psychology, 49(3), 141-157. doi:10.1002/ijop.12034
Giuliani, M. V. (2003). Theory of attachment and place attachment. In M. Bonnes, T. Lee, & M. Bonaiuto (Eds.), Psychological theories for environmental issues (pp. 137-170). Aldershot, United Kingdom: Ashgate.
Hidalgo, M. C., & Hernández, B. (2001). Place attachment: Conceptual and empirical questions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(3), 273-281. doi:10.1006/jevp.2001.0221
Izenstark, D., & Ebata, A. T. (2016). Theorizing family-based nature activities and family functioning: The integration of attention restoration theory with a family routines and rituals perspective. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 8(2), 137-153. doi:10.1111/jftr.12138
Lee, B. A., & Evans, M. (2020). Forced to move: Patterns and predictors of residential displacement during an era of housing insecurity. Social Science Research, 87, 102415. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2020.102415
Lengen, C., & Kistemann, T. (2012). Sense of place and place identity: Review of neuroscientific evidence. Health & Place 18(5), 1162-1171. doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2012.01.012
Lewicka, M. (2011a). On the varieties of people’s relationships with places: Hummon’s typology revisited. Environment and Behavior, 43(5), 676-709. doi:10.1177/0013916510364917
Lewicka, M. (2011b). Place attachment: How far have we come in the last 40 years? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31(3), 207-230. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.10.001
Louv, R. (2016). A última criança na natureza: Resgatando nossas crianças do transtorno do déficit de natureza [The last child in nature: Rescuing our children from the deficit of nature disorder] (A. Azuma & C. Belhassof, Trans.). São Paulo, SP: Aquariana.
Mayer, F. S., & Frantz, C. M. (2004). The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals feeling in community with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(4), 504-515. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.10.001
Merdjanoff, A. A. (2013). There’s no place like home: Examining the emotional consequences of Hurricane Katrina on the displaced residents of New Orleans. Social Science Research, 42(5), 1222-1235. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2013.04.004
Morse, C., & Mudgett, C. (2017). Longing for landscape: Homesickness and place attachment among rural out-migrants in the 19th and 21st centuries. Journal of Rural Studies, 50, 95-103. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.01.002
Moulay, A., Ujang, N., Maulan, S., & Ismail, S. (2018). Understanding the process of parks’ attachment: Interrelation between place attachment, behavioural tendencies, and the use of public place. City, Culture and Society, 14, 28-36. doi:10.1016/j.ccs.2017.12.002
Nisbet, E. K. (2014). Canadians connect with nature and increase their well-being: Results of the 2014 David Suzuki Foundation 30x30 Nature Challenge. Retrieved from https://davidsuzuki.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/2014-30x30-nature-challenge-results.pdf
Otto, S., & Pensini, P. (2017). Nature-based environmental education of children: Environmental knowledge and connectedness to nature, together, are related to ecological behaviour. Global Environmental Change, 47, 88-94. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.09.009
Payne, E. A., Loi, N. M., & Thorsteinsson, E. B. (2020). The restorative effect of the natural environment on university students’ psychological health. Journal of Environmental and Public Health, 2020, 4210285. doi:10.1155/2020/4210285
Plunkett, D., Phillips, R., & Kocaoglu, B. U. (2018). Place attachment and community development. Journal of Community Practice, 26(4), 471-482. doi:10.1080/10705422.2018.1521352
Richardson, M., Hallam, J., & Lumber, R. (2015). One thousand good things in nature: Aspects of nearby nature associated with improved connection to nature. Environmental Values, 24(5), 603-619. doi:10.3197/096327115X14384223590131
Riemer, J. W. (2004). Job relocation, sources of stress, and sense of home. Community, Work & Family, 3(2), 205-217. doi:10.1080/713658901
Roazzi, A., & Souza, B. C. (2019). Advancing facet theory as the framework of choice to understand complex phenomena in the social and human sciences. In S. H. Koller (Ed.), Psychology in Brazil: Scientists making a difference (pp. 283-309). New York, NY: Springer.
Roazzi, A., & Dias, M. G. B. B. (2001). Teoria das facetas e avaliação na pesquisa social transcultural: Explorações no estudo do juízo moral. In Conselho Regional de Psicologia – 13a Região PB/RN (Ed.), A diversidade da avaliação psicológica: Considerações teóricas e práticas (pp. 157-190). João Pessoa, PB: Idéia.
Rosa, D. C. C. B., Roazzi, A., & Higuchi, M. I. G. (2015). PSICAMB – Perfil de Afinidade Ecológica: Um Estudo sobre os Indicadores da Postura perante a Natureza. Psico, 46(1), 139-149. https://doi.org/10.15448/1980-8623.2015.1.17415
Rosa, C. D., Profice, C. C., & Collado, S. (2018). Nature experiences and adults’ self-reported pro-environmental behaviors: The role of connectedness to nature and childhood nature experiences. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1055. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01055
Scannell, L., & Gifford, R. (2010). Defining place attachment: A tripartite organizing framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(1), 1-10. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.09.006
Scannell, L., & Gifford, R. (2017). Place attachment enhances psychological need satisfaction. Environment and Behavior, 49(4), 359-389. doi:10.1177/0013916516637648
Schultz, P. W. (2001). The structure of environmental concern: Concern for self, other people and the biosphere. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(4), 327-339. doi:10.1006/jevp.2001.0227
Shin, J.-H. (2016). Toward a theory of environmental satisfaction and human comfort: A process-oriented and contextually sensitive theoretical framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 45, 11-21. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.11.004
Smith, M. A., Dunhill, A., & Scott, G. W. (2018). Fostering children’s relationship with nature: Exploring the potential of Forest School. Education, 46(5), 525-534. doi:10.1080/03004279.2017.1298644
Steel, B. S., List, P., & Shindler, B. (1994). Conflicting values about federal forests: A comparison of national and Oregon publics. Society & Natural Resources, 7(2), 137-153. doi:10.1080/08941929409380852
Strathman, A., Gleicher, F., Boninger, D. S., & Edwards, C. S. (1994). The consideration of future consequences: Weighing immediate and distant outcomes of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(4), 742-752. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.66.4.742
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The Editorial Board authorizes free access to and distribution of published contentes, provided that the source is cited, that is, granding credit to the authors and Paidéia and preserving the full text. The author is allowed to place the final version (postprint / editor’s PDF) in an institutional/thematic repositor or personal page (site, blog), immediately after publication, provided that it is available for open access and comes without any embargo period. Full reference should be made to the first publication in Paidéia. Access to the paper should at least be aligned with the access the journal offers.
As a legal entity, the University of São Paulo at Ribeirão Preto School of Philosophy, Sciences and Languages owns and holds the copyright deriving from the publication. To use the papers, Paidéia adopts the Creative Commons Licence, CC BY-NC non-commercial attribution. This licence permits access, download, print, share, reuse and distribution of papers, provided that this is for non-commercial use and that the source is cited, giving due authorship credit to Paidéia. In these cases, neither authors nor editors need any permission.
When deriving from research involving human beings, manuscripts need IRB approval, in compliance with the guidelines and standards of the Brazilian National Health Council Resolution 196/96 – Ministry of Health. Authors should attach the digital copy of the IRB declaration of approval, according to instructions displayed further ahead.
