Cuestionario de Coparentalidad (CQ): Adaptación y Evidencia de Validez para Brasil

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/

Palabras clave:

prácticas de creación de los hijos, evaluación psicológica, validación estadística, psicometría

Resumen

La coparentalidad es el esfuerzo conjunto entre dos cuidadores para criar a un niño y es importante la salud mental de las familias. Este artículo busca describir los procedimientos de adaptación y evidencias de validez del Cuestionario de Coparentalidad (CQ) para Brasil. La adaptación se realizó según las etapas: traducción; síntesis de versiones traducidas; evaluación por expertos y público objetivo; y traducción inversa. Para evaluar su estructura factorial, se realizaron análisis factoriales confirmatorios en modelos multifactoriales y bifactoriales en una muestra de 590 madres/padres de 21 a 60 años (M = 36,24; DE = 5,88) residentes en 21 estados brasileros. El CQ presentó ajustes adecuados para una solución multifactorial correlacionada y para el modelo bifactorial. Índices complementarios indican que su estructura multifactorial es la más adecuada. Considerando que el 90% de los participantes son mujeres, los resultados muestran el CQ como válido para medir la coparentalidad en mujeres brasileñas.

Descargas

Los datos de descarga aún no están disponibles.

Referencias

Barzel, M., & Reid, G. J. (2011). A preliminary examination of the psychometric properties of the Coparenting Questionnaire and the Diabetes-Specific Coparenting Questionnaire in families of children with type I diabetes. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 36(5), 606-617. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsq103

Becker, A. P. S., & Crepaldi, M. A. (2019). O apego desenvolvido na infância e o relacionamento conjugal e parental: Uma revisão da literature [The attachment developed in childhood and the conjugal and parental relationship: A review of the literature]. Estudos e Pesquisas em Psicologia, 19(1), 238-260. https://doi.org/10.12957/epp.2019.43016

Borsa, J. C., Damásio, B. F., & Bandeira, D. R. (2012). Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of psychological instruments: Some considerations. Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto), 22(53), 423-432. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-43272253201314

De Souza, J., & Crepaldi, M. A. (2019). Problemas emocionais e comportamentais nas crianças: Associação entre funcionamento familiar, coparentalidade e relação conjugal. [Emotional and behavioral problems of children: Association between family functioning, coparenting and marital relationship]. Acta Colombiana de Psicología, 22(1), 69-81. http://www.dx.doi.org/10.14718/ACP.2019.22.1.5

DiStefano, C., McDaniel, H. L., Zhang, L., Shi, D., & Jiang, Z. (2019). Fitting large factor analysis models with ordinal data. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 79(3), 417-436. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164418818242

Dominguez-Lara, S., & Rodríguez, A. (2017). Statistical indices from bifactor models. Interacciones: Revista de Avances en Psicología, 3(2), 59-65. https://doi.org/10.24016/2017.v3n2.51

Feinberg, M. E., Brown, L. D., & Kan, M. L. (2012). A multi-domain self-report measure of coparenting. Parenting, 12(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295192.2012.638870

Fidelis, D., Heinen, M., Mosmann, C. P., Falcke, D., & Schaefer, J. R. (2022). Relações entre conjugalidade, parentalidade e coparentalidade em famílias com crianças [Relationships between conjugality, parenting and coparenting in families with children: A systematic review]. Cadernos de Psicologia, 2(2), 16. https://doi.org/10.9788/CP2022.2-03

Flores-Kanter, P. E., Dominguez-Lara, S., Trógolo, M. A., & Medrano, L. A. (2018). Best practices in the use of bifactor models: Conceptual grounds, fit indices and complementary indicators. Revista Evaluar, 18(3), 44-48. https://doi.org/10.35670/1667-4545.v18.n3.22221

International Test Commission. (2017). International Test Commission guidelines for translating and adapting tests (2nd ed.). https://www.intestcom.org/files/guideline_test_adaptation_2ed.pdf

Lamela, D., Nunes-Costa, R., & Figueiredo, B. (2010). Modelos teóricos das relações coparentais: Revisão crítica [Theoretical models of coparenting relations: Critical review]. Psicologia em Estudo, 15(1), 205-216. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-73722010000100022

Leusin, J. F., Petrucci, G. W., & Borsa, J. C. (2018). Clima familiar e os problemas emocionais e comportamentais na infância [Family climate and the emotional and behavioral problems in childhood]. Revista da SPAGESP, 19(1), 49-61. http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-29702018000100005

Machado, M. R., & Mosmann, C. P. (2020). Coparental conflict and triangulation, emotion regulation, and externalizing problems in adolescents: Direct and indirect relationships. Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto), 30, e3034. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1982-4327e3004

Margolin, G., Gordis, E. B., & John, R. S. (2001). Coparenting: A link between marital conflict and parenting in two-parent families. Journal of Family Psychology, 15(1), 3-21. https://doi.org/10.1037//0893-3200.15.1.3

McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Lawrence Erlbaum.

Mollà Cusí, L., Günther-Bel, C., Vilaregut Puigdesens, A. V., Campreciós Orriols, M., & Matalí Costa, J. L. (2020). Instruments for the assessment of coparenting: A systematic review. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 29(9), 2487-2506. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-020-01769-3

Parry, L. Q., Davies, P. T., Sturge-Apple, M. L., & Coe, J. L. (2020). Coparental discord and children’s behavior problems: Children’s negative family representations as an explanatory mechanism. Journal of Family Psychology, 34(5), 523-533. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000638

Pedro, M. F., & Ribeiro, M. T. (2015). Adaptação portuguesa do questionário de coparentalidade: Análise fatorial confirmatória e estudos de validade e fiabilidade. [Portuguese adaptation of the coparenting questionnaire: Confirmatory factor analysis, validity and reliability]. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 28(1), 116-125. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7153.201528113

Reise, S. P., Bonifay, W. E., & Haviland, M. G. (2013). Scoring and modeling psychological measures in the presence of multidimensionality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 95(2), 129-140. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2012.725437

Rodriguez, A., Reise, S. P., & Haviland, M. G. (2016). Applying bifactor statistical indices in the evaluation of psychological measures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 98(3), 223-237. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2015.1089249

Ruiz-Hernández, J. A., Moral-Zafra, E., Llor-Esteban, B., & Jiménez-Barbero, J. A. (2019). Influence of parental styles and other psychosocial variables on the development of externalizing behaviors in adolescents: A systematic review. The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 11(1), 9-21. https://doi.org/10.5093/ejpalc2018a11

Shi, D., & Maydeu-Olivares, A. (2020). The effect of estimation methods on SEM Fit Indices. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 80(3), 421-445. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164419885164

Souza, F. M., Fiorini, M. C., & Crepaldi, M. A. (2020). Coparentalidade e envolvimento parental em famílias binucleares: Revisão sistemática [Coparentality and parental involvement in binuclear families: Systematic literature review]. Actualidades en Psicología, 34(129), 119-140. http://dx.doi.org/10.15517/ap.v34i129.35334

Xia, Y., & Yang, Y. (2019). RMSEA, CFI, and TLI in structural equation modeling with ordered categorical data: The story they tell depends on the estimation methods. Behavior Research Methods, 51(1), 409-428. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1055-2

Wang, J., & Wang, X. (2019). Structural equation modeling: Applications using Mplus. Wiley.

Williams, D. T. (2018). Parental depression and cooperative coparenting: A longitudinal and dyadic approach. Family Relations, 67(2), 253-269. https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12308

Publicado

2024-05-06

Número

Sección

Psicología del Desarrollo

Cómo citar

Padilha, A. P., Varas, G. V. V., & Bosa, J. C. (2024). Cuestionario de Coparentalidad (CQ): Adaptación y Evidencia de Validez para Brasil. Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto), 33, e3317. https://doi.org/10.1590/