Locais desativados

Ruínas, resistência e cuidado no final da primeira era nuclear

Autores

Palavras-chave:

persistência, lituânia, descomissionamento nuclear, fotografia, pós-industrial, ruínas

Resumo

Este artigo advoga por uma geografia dos lugares desindustrializados como espaços de habitação e de persistência, ao invés de uma que se baseia em narrativas de progresso, declínio e ruína. Há muito as ruínas constituem uma questão para os geógrafos, embora as reminiscências materiais dos grandes esquemas da modernidade acabem facilmente endossando formas de perceber e de compreender lugares desindustrializados ao ponto de apagarem as práticas através das quais vidas e mundos são construídos no presente. A partir de trabalho de campo realizado na cidade de Visaginas, ex-atomgrad soviética na Lituânia, o artigo tanto reconhece quanto resiste aos apelos da ruína. Afastando-se das temporalidades da ruína que implicam progresso e declínio, oferece uma análise das práticas e modos de habitação em cursos em lugares definidos pelo arruinamento. Uma compreensão reflexiva de nosso papel contaminado no processo de fazer sentido de tais lugares nos permite, ao mesmo tempo, tanto nos encantar pelas grandes narrativas de hubris e de declínio quanto ver outras histórias – histórias de perseverança, de persistência, de viver em lugares enquadrados como sem futuro por regimes políticos e econômicos. Nesse sentido, o artigo oferece uma geografia alternativa dos lugares que são descomissionados a partir de cima, atentando para o cuidado, compromissos, práticas criativas e projetos estéticos por meio das quais seus habitantes seguem vivendo. Engajando essa abordagem através de uma série de pequenas histórias baseadas em trabalho de campo etnográfico e colaborativo com dois fotógrafos em Visaginas, postulo que as reminiscências materiais e subjetivas dos sonhos da primeira era nuclear engendram formas emergentes de vida que excedem as narrativas de progresso e declínio. As ruínas da modernidade nuclear soviética operam aqui como recipientes para práticas de persistência e de perseverança em meio às mudanças de relações de poder e capital, ao invés de serem objetos de perda melancólica; e também como matérias-primas por meio das quais forjam-se novas formas de viver em espaços tidos como desnecessários.

Biografia do Autor

  • Leila Dawney

    Professora da Faculdade de Ciências da Vida e Ambientais, Universidade de Exeter (Exeter, Reino Unido).

  • Aécio Amaral

    Mestre em Sociologia, professor do Departamento de Ciências Sociais da Universidade Federal da Paraíba, Campus I, João Pessoa.

  • Natanael de Alencar Santos

    Doutorando em Sociologia pelo Programa de Pós-Graduação em Sociologia da Universidade Federal de São Carlos.

Referências

Balockaite, R. (2012). Coping with the unwanted past in planned socialist towns: Visaginas, Tychy, and Nowa Huta. Slovo, 24, 41–60.

Benjamin, W. (1999). The arcades project (H. Eiland & K. McLaughlin, Trans.). London, UK: Belknap Press.

Berlant, L. G. (2011). Cruel optimism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Berman, M. (1983). All that is solid melts into air: The experience of modernity. Brooklyn, NY: Verso.

Braun, B., & Wakefield, S., (2014). Inhabiting the Postapocalyptic city, Society and Space.org, Retrieved from http://societyandspace.org/2014/02/11/inhabiting-the-postapocalyti

c-city-bruce-braun-and-stephanie-wakefield/

Brigstocke, J. (2016). Exhausted futures. GeoHumanities, 2, 92–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/2373566X.2016.1168192

Brown, K. L. (2013). Plutopia: Nuclear families, atomic cities, and the great Soviet and American plutonium disasters. New York, NY: Oxford, UK University Press.

Chelcea, L. (2015). Postindustrial ecologies: Industrial rubble, nature and the limits of representation. Parcours Anthropologiques, 10, 186–201.https://doi.org/10.4000/pa.448

Cinis, A., Drėmaitė, M., & Kalm, M. (2008). Perfect representations of Soviet planned space: Mono‐industrial towns in the Soviet Baltic Republics in the 1950s–1980s. Scandinavian Journal of History, 33, 226–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/03468750802079409

Dawdy, S. L., Castañeda, Q. E., Crossland, Z., Fowles, S., Geismar, H., Holtorf, C., McGuire, R. H., Olivier, L., Shepherd, N., Wengrow, D., & Dawdy, S. L. (2010). Clockpunk anthropology and the ruins of modernity. Current Anthropology, 51, 761–793. https://doi.org/10.1086/657626

DeSilvey, C. (2007). Salvage memory: Constellating material histories on a hardscrabble homestead. Cultural Geographies, 14, 401–424. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474474007078206

DeSilvey, C. (2017). Curated decay: Heritage beyond saving. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

DeSilvey, C., & Edensor, T. (2013). Reckoning with ruins. Progress in Human Geography, 37, 465–485. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132512462271

Dillon, B. (2014). Ruin lust. London, UK: Tate Gallery Publishing.

Dwyer, C., & Davies, G. (2009). Qualitative methods III: Animating archives, artful interventions and online environments. Progress in Human Geography, 34, 88–97. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1177/0309132508105005

Edensor, T. (2005). Industrial ruins: Spaces, aesthetics and materiality. Oxford, UK; New York, NY: Berg.

Fabian, J. (1983). Time and the other: How anthropology constructs its object. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

Fisher, J. C. (1962). Planning the city of socialist man. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 28, 251–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366208979451

Fraser, E. (2018). Unbecoming place: Urban imaginaries in transition in Detroit. Cultural Geographies, 25, 441–458. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474474017748508

Gallagher, M. (2015). Sounding ruins: Reflections on the production of an ‘audio drift’. Cultural Geographies, 22, 467–485. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474474014542745

Ginn, F. (2015). When horses won't eat: Apocalypse and the anthropocene. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 105, 351–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2014.988100

Gordillo, G. R. (2014). Rubble: The afterlife of destruction. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Haraway, D. J. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Haraway, D. J., & Randolf, L. M. (1997). Modest_witness@second_millennium:; femaleman_meets_oncomouse: feminism and technoscience. London, UK: Routledge.

Harvey, P., & Knox, H. (2015). Roads: An anthropology of infrastructure and expertise. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Hatherley, O. (2015). The landscapes of Communism: A history through buildings. London, UK: Allen Lane.

Hecht, G. (2012). Being nuclear: Africans and the global uranium trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Hill, L. (2013). Archaeologies and geographies of the post‐industrial past: Landscape, memory and the spectral. Cultural Geographies, 20, 379–

https://doi.org/10.1177/1474474013480121

Jay, M. (1998). Scopic regimes of modernity. In H. Foster (Ed.), Vision and Visuality (pp. 3–23). Seattle, Washington D.C.: Bay Press.

Kitchin, R., O'Callaghan, C., & Gleeson, J. (2014). The new ruins of Ireland? Unfinished estates in the post‐celtic tiger era. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38, 1069–1080. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12118

Lear, J. (2006). Radical hope: Ethics in the face of cultural devastation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Lorimer, H. (2003). Telling small stories: Spaces of knowledge and the practice of geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 28, 197–217. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-5661.00087

Lorimer, H., & Murray, S. (2015). The ruin in question. Performance Research, 20, 58–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/13528165.2015.1049037

Macaulay, R., Beny, R., & Smith, C. B. (1967). Pleasure of ruins. London, UK: Thames and Hudson.

MacDonald, F. (2014). The ruins of Erskine Beveridge. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 39, 477–489. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12042

Mah, A. (2012). Industrial ruination, community, and place: Landscapes and legacies of urban decline. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.

Millington, N. (2013). Post‐industrial imaginaries: Nature, representation and ruin in Detroit, Michigan. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37, 279–296. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2012.01206.x

O'Callaghan, C., Boyle, M., & Kitchin, R. (2014). Post‐politics, crisis, and Ireland's ‘ghost estates’. Political Geography, 42, 121–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2014.07.006

Povinelli, E. A. (2011). Economies of abandonment: Social belonging and endurance in late liberalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Safransky, S. (2014). Greening the urban frontier: Race, property, and resettlement in Detroit. Geoforum, 56, 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.06.003

Safransky, S. (2017). Rethinking land struggle in the postindustrial city. Antipode, 49, 1079–1100. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12225

Said, E. (1978). Orientalism. London, UK: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Simone, A. (2004). People as infrastructure: Intersecting fragments in Johannesburg. Public Culture, 16, 407–429. https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-16-3-407

Šliavaitė, K. (2015). ‘Homeland is where everything is for the people’: The rationale of belonging and citizenship in the context of social uncertainty. In I. H. Knudsen, & M. D. Frederiksen (Eds.), Ethnographies of grey zones in Eastern Europe: Relations, borders and invisibilities (pp. 107–122). New York, NY: Anthem Press.

Sorace, C., & Hurst, W. (2016). China's phantom urbanisation and the pathology of ghost cities. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 46, 304–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2015.1115532

Stoler, A. L. (2013). Imperial debris: On ruins and ruination. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Storm, A. (2014). Post‐industrial landscape scars. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

Strangleman, T. (2013). “Smokestack Nostalgia”, “Ruin Porn” or working‐class obituary: The role and meaning of deindustrial representation. International Labor and Working‐Class History, 84, 23–37. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0147547913000239

Swanton, D. (2012). Afterimages of steel: Dortmund. Space and Culture, 15, 264–282. https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331212466088

Tsing, A. L. (2015). The mushroom at the end of the world: On the possibility of life in capitalist ruins. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Wakefield, S. (2018). Infrastructures of liberal life: From modernity and progress to resilience and ruins. Geography Compass, 12, e12377. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12377

Wakefield, S., & Braun, B. (2019). Oystertecture: Infrastructure, profanation and the sacred figure of the human. In K. Hetherington (Ed.), Infras tructure, environment, and life in the Anthropocene (pp. 193–215). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Walkerdine, V., & Jimenez, L. (2012). Gender, work and community after de‐industrialisation: A psychosocial approach to affect. Basingstoke,

UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

Wallsten, B., Johansson, N., & Krook, J. (2013). A cable laid is a cable played: On the hibernation logic behind urban infrastructure mines. Journal of Urban Technology, 20, 85–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2013.809222

Wendland, A. V. (2015). Inventing the atomograd. Nuclear urbanism as a way of life in Eastern Europe, 1970–2011. In T. F. L. G. Thomas

Bohn & A. Graf (Eds.), The impact of disaster: Social and cultural approaches to Fukushima and Chernobyl (pp. 261–287). Berlin, Germany: EB Publishers.

Woodworth, M. D., & Wallace, J. L. (2017). Seeing ghosts: Parsing China's “ghost city” controversy. Urban Geography, 38, 1270–1281. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2017.1288009

Downloads

Publicado

2024-04-19

Edição

Seção

Traduções

Como Citar

Dawney, L. . (2024). Locais desativados: Ruínas, resistência e cuidado no final da primeira era nuclear (A. . Amaral & N. de A. . Santos , Trads.). Ponto Urbe, 2(30), 1-27. https://www.revistas.usp.br/pontourbe/article/view/217180