The net income smoothing and the persistence of earnings accounts in Brazilian public companies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1982-6486.rco.2019.154173Keywords:
Earnings persistence, Income smoothing, Discretionary accruals, Earnings qualityAbstract
The literature is not conclusive whether the income smoothing represents or not good quality of the accounting information, since it is a form of earnings management and since it is also associated with the earnings persistence. This paper uses the income accounts as a means to verifying whether the income smoothing, in the interests of the managers, can coexist with the persistence, giving the investors greater capacity to predict future cash flows. With the sample formed by 295 Brazilian companies, in the period from 2010 to 2015, we verified that there are accounts classified by their function, which form the net income and are persistent, but when observed the treatment group formed only by the companies that smoothed more, we verified that there are accounts that maintain their persistence, but some does not present significant persistence. In another sample formed by 76 companies that most smoothed, with the treatment group formed by companies that smoothed with discretionary accruals, it was observed that selling expense and other operating revenue/expense remain persistent. These results suggest that the association between income smoothing and persistence occurs through the income accounts that compose it, but there is a reduction of predictive capacity in companies with smoothed net income.
Downloads
References
review, 76(1), 27-58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2001.76.1.27
Dechow, P., Ge, W., & Schrand, C. (2010). Understanding earnings quality: A review of the proxies, their
determinants and their consequences. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50(2–3), 344–401. DOI: https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2010.09.001
Dechow, P. M. (1994). Accounting earnings and cash flows as measures of firm performance. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 18(1), 3–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(94)90016-7
Dechow, P. M., Kothari, S. P., & L. Watts, R. (1998). The relation between earnings and cash flows. Journal of
Accounting and Economics, 25(2), 133–168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(98)00020-2
Fávero, L., Belfiore, P., Silva, F., & Chan, B. (2009). Análise de dados: modelagem multivariada para tomada de
decisões. ISBN: 9788535230468
Govendir, B., & Wells, P. (2014). The influence of the accruals generating process on earnings persistence.
Australian Journal of Management, 39(4), 593-614. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0312896213512319
Graham, J. R., Harvey, C. R., & Rajgopal, S. (2005). The economic implications of corporate financial reporting.
Journal of Accounting and Economics, 40(1), 3–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2005.01.002
Gujarati, D. (2006). Econometria Básica. Rio de Janeiro: Campus/Elsevier. ISBN: 978-8563308320
Healy, P. M., & Wahlen, J. M. (1999). A review of the earnings management literature and its implications for
standard setting. Accounting horizons, 13(4), 365-383. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.1999.13.4.365
Jung, B., Soderstrom, N., & Yang, Y. S. (2013). Earnings smoothing activities of firms to manage credit ratings.
Contemporary Accounting Research, 30(2), 645-676. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.2012.01170.x
Kolozsvari, A. C., & da Silva Macedo, M. A. (2016). Análise da Influência da Presença da Suavização de
Resultados sobre a Persistência dos Lucros no Mercado Brasileiro. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças-USP,
27(72), 306-319. DOI: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=257149750004
Kothari, S. P., Leone, A. J., & Wasley, C. E. (2005). Performance matched discretionary accrual measures. Journal
of Accounting and Economics, 39(1), 163–197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2004.11.002
Leuz, C., Nanda, D., & Wysocki, P. D. (2003). Earnings management and investor protection: an international
comparison. Journal of Financial Economics, 69(3), 505–527. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-
405X(03)00121-1
Mc Innis, J. (2010, January 30). Earnings smoothness, average returns, and implied cost of equity capital.
Accounting Review, 85, pp. 315–341. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2010.85.1.315
Myers, J. N., Myers, L. A., & Skinner, D. J. (2007). Earnings momentum and earnings Management. Journal of
Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 22(2), 249–284. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X0702200211
Salewski, M., & Zülch, H. (2015). Discretion in the accounting for defined benefit obligations–an empirical
analysis of German IFRS statements. Journal of Pension Economics & Finance, 14(3), 266-292. DOI: https://
doi.org/10.1017/S1474747214000249
Scott, W. R. (2012). Financial accounting theory (6th ed). Toronto: Pearson Canada. ISBN: 9780135119150
Sloan, R. G. (1996). Do stock prices fully reflect information in accruals and cash flows about future earnings?.
Accounting review, 289-315. https://www.jstor.org/stable/248290?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Tucker, J. W., & Zarowin, P. A. (2006). Does income smoothing improve earnings informativeness?. The
Accounting Review, 81(1), 251-270. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2006.81.1.251
Wang, Z. (2014). Measuring investors’ assessment of earnings persistence: do investors see through smoothed
earnings?. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 42(4), 691-708. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/
s11156-013-0358-8
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The RCO adopts the Free Open Access policy, under the standard Creative Commons agreement (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). The agreement provides that:
- Submission of text authorizes its publication and implies commitment that the same material is not being submitted to another journal. The original is considered definitive.
- Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which allows the sharing of the work with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are authorized to take additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g. publish in an institutional repository or as a book chapter), with necessary recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their personal page) before or during the editorial process, as this can generate productive changes as well as increase the impact and citation of published work (See The Effect of Free Access).
- The journal does not pay copyright to the authors of the published texts.
- The journal's copyright holder, except those already agreed in the Free Open Access Agreement (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), is the Accounting Department of the Faculty of Economics, Administration and Accounting of Ribeirão Preto of the University of São Paulo.
No submission or publication fees are charged.
Up to 4 authors per article are accepted. Exceptionally duly justified cases may be reviewed by the Executive Committee of the RCO. Exceptional cases are considered as: multi-institutional projects; manuscripts resulting from the collaboration of research groups; or involving large teams for evidence collection, construction of primary data, and comparative experiments.
It is recommended that the authorship be ordered by contribution of each of the individuals listed as authors, especially in the design and planning of the research project, in obtaining or analyzing and interpreting data, and writing. Authors must declare the actual contributions of each author, filling the letter to the editor, at the beginning of the submission, taking responsibility for the information given.
Authors are allowed to change throughout the evaluation process and prior to the publication of the manuscript. The Authors should indicate the composition and final order of authorship in the document signed by all those involved when accepted for publication. If the composition and authoring order is different than previously reported in the system, all previously listed authors should be in agreement.
In the case of identification of authorship without merit or contribution (ghost, guest or gift authorship), the RCO follows the procedure recommended by COPE.
