Integration of quantitative and qualitative approaches: essay on mixed methods in Accounting research
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1982-6486.rco.2023.221846Downloads
References
Creswell, J. W. C. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. (3. ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.
Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2015). Mixed methods search: Research methods series. London: Publishing Think.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln Y. S. (2017). The sage handbook of qualitative research. (5. ed.). London: Sage.
Flick, U. (2009). An introduction to qualitative research. (4. ed.). London: Sage.
Grafton, J., Lillis, A. M., & Mahama, H. (2011). Mixed methods research in accounting. Qualitative Research in Accounting and Management, 8(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1108/11766091111124676
Greene, J. C. (2008). Is mixed methods social inquiry a distinctive methodology. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2(1), 7-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689807309969
Hanson, W. E., Creswell, J. W., Clark, V. L. P., Petska, K. S., & Creswell, J. D. (2005). Mixed methods research designs in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52 (2), 224.
Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research a research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33 (7), 14-26.
Leech, N. L., Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2009). A typology of mixed methods research designs. Quality & quantity, 43 (2), 265-275.
Martins, G. A., & Theóphilo, C. R. (2016). Metodologia da investigação científica para ciências sociais aplicadas. (3. ed.). São Paulo: Atlas.
Morgan, D. (2007). Paradigms Lost and Pragmatism Regained: Methodological Implications of Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research January, 1(1), 48-76.
Sale, J., Lohfeld, L., & Brazil, K. (2002). Revisiting the qualitative-quantitative debate: Implications for mixed methods research. Quality & Quantity. 36(1), 43-53.
Sampieri, R. H., Collado, C. F., & Lucio, M. P. B. (2010). Metodología de la investigación. (5. ed.). México D.F.: McGraw-Hill.
Scott, P. J., & Briggs, J. S. (2009). A pragmatists argument for mixed methodology in medical informatics. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 3(2), 223-41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689809334209
Small, M. L. (2011). How to conduct a mixed methods study: Recent trends in rapidly growing literature. Annual Review Sociology. 37(1), 57-86.
Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2003). Handbook on mixed methods in the behavioral and social sciences. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Theóphilo, C. R. (2004). Pesquisa em contabilidade no Brasil: uma análise crítico-epistemológica (Tese Doutorado). Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo.
Theóphilo, C. R., & Iudícibus, S. (2005). Uma análise crítico epistemológica da produção científica em contabilidade no Brasil. UnB Contábil, 8 (2), 147-175.
Yin, R. K. (2006). Mixed methods research: are the methods genuinely integrated or merely parallel? Research in the Schools. 13(1), 41-7.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Carlos Renato Theóphilo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The RCO adopts the Free Open Access policy, under the standard Creative Commons agreement (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). The agreement provides that:
- Submission of text authorizes its publication and implies commitment that the same material is not being submitted to another journal. The original is considered definitive.
- Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which allows the sharing of the work with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are authorized to take additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g. publish in an institutional repository or as a book chapter), with necessary recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their personal page) before or during the editorial process, as this can generate productive changes as well as increase the impact and citation of published work (See The Effect of Free Access).
- The journal does not pay copyright to the authors of the published texts.
- The journal's copyright holder, except those already agreed in the Free Open Access Agreement (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), is the Accounting Department of the Faculty of Economics, Administration and Accounting of Ribeirão Preto of the University of São Paulo.
No submission or publication fees are charged.
Up to 4 authors per article are accepted. Exceptionally duly justified cases may be reviewed by the Executive Committee of the RCO. Exceptional cases are considered as: multi-institutional projects; manuscripts resulting from the collaboration of research groups; or involving large teams for evidence collection, construction of primary data, and comparative experiments.
It is recommended that the authorship be ordered by contribution of each of the individuals listed as authors, especially in the design and planning of the research project, in obtaining or analyzing and interpreting data, and writing. Authors must declare the actual contributions of each author, filling the letter to the editor, at the beginning of the submission, taking responsibility for the information given.
Authors are allowed to change throughout the evaluation process and prior to the publication of the manuscript. The Authors should indicate the composition and final order of authorship in the document signed by all those involved when accepted for publication. If the composition and authoring order is different than previously reported in the system, all previously listed authors should be in agreement.
In the case of identification of authorship without merit or contribution (ghost, guest or gift authorship), the RCO follows the procedure recommended by COPE.