Comparative study of serological tests in immunological diagnosis for neurocysticercosis

Authors

  • Carmen Silvia de Melo Pialarissi Instituto Adolfo Lutz de São Paulo; Seção de Sorologia
  • Adelaide José Vaz Instituto Adolfo Lutz de São Paulo; Seção de Sorologia
  • Ana Maria Carvalho de Souza Instituto Adolfo Lutz de São Paulo; Seção de Sorologia
  • Paulo Mutuko Nakamura Instituto Adolfo Lutz de São Paulo; Seção de Sorologia
  • Eide Dias Camargo Instituto Adolfo Lutz de São Paulo; Seção de Sorologia
  • Marcos Vinícius da Silva Hospital Emílio Ribas
  • Mirthes Ueda Instituto Adolfo Lutz de São Paulo; Seção de Sorologia

Keywords:

Neurocisticercose, Líquido cefalorraquiano, Imunodiagnóstico da neurocisticercose

Abstract

Four immunological techniques were evaluated for the detection of antibodies to Cysticercus cellulosae in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF): complement fixation test (CF), passive haem-magglutination test (PHA), indirect immunofluorescence test (IF) and the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). One-hundred twenty-five CSF from patients with confirmed neurocysticercosis and 94 CSF from a control group (60 from patients suffering from neurological disorders other than neurocysticercosis and 34 from presumably healthy individuals) were assayed. The sensitivity and specificity of the tests were determined, which were, 48.0% and 90.4% for CF; 88 8% and 96.8% for FHA; 87.2% and 98.9% for IF, and 97.6% and 98.9% for ELISA, respectively. There were significative differences among the tests and these allowed to conclude that the best immunodiagnostic test for neurocysticercosis was ELISA, followed by PHA and IF tests.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

1987-12-01

Issue

Section

Original Articles

How to Cite

Pialarissi, C. S. de M., Vaz, A. J., Souza, A. M. C. de, Nakamura, P. M., Camargo, E. D., Silva, M. V. da, & Ueda, M. (1987). Comparative study of serological tests in immunological diagnosis for neurocysticercosis . Revista Do Instituto De Medicina Tropical De São Paulo, 29(6), 367-373. https://www.revistas.usp.br/rimtsp/article/view/28545