Immunodiagnostic confirmation of hydatid disease in patients with a presumptive diagnosis of infection

Authors

  • V. M. Varela-diaz World Health Organization; Pan American Health Organization; Pan American Zoonoses Center
  • E. A. Coltorti World Health Organization; Pan American Health Organization; Pan American Zoonoses Center

Abstract

Information obtained from the routine application of hydatid immunodiagnostic techniques in different clinical situations over a seven-year period is presented. The Immunoelectrophoresis test was used until it was replaced by the simpler, more sensitive and equally specific arc 5 double diffusion (DD5) test. Examination of sera from 1,888 patients with signs and/or symptoms compatible with hydatid disease revealed that the presurgical confirmation of Echinococcus granulosus infection is only obtained by detection of anti-antigen 5 antibodies. The latter were not found in 1,539 presumptive hydatidosis patients whose definitive diagnoses corresponded to other disease conditions. However, false positive latex agglutination test results were obtained in two cases. In all patients whose preoperative serum showed three or more uncharacteristic bands in the absence of anti-antigen 5 antibodies, hydatid cysts were found sur gically. DD5 testing of a fluid sample collected by puncture established its hydatid etiology. Post-operative monitoring of hydatidosis patients demonstrated that persistence of DD5-positivity two years after surgery established the presence of other cysts. Further evidence was obtained in patients with hydatid cysts in intrathoracic, abdominal or other locations associating cyst membrane integrity, antigen release and immunodiagnostic test positivity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

1984-04-01

Issue

Section

Original Articles

How to Cite

Varela-diaz, V. M., & Coltorti, E. A. (1984). Immunodiagnostic confirmation of hydatid disease in patients with a presumptive diagnosis of infection . Revista Do Instituto De Medicina Tropical De São Paulo, 26(2), 87-96. https://www.revistas.usp.br/rimtsp/article/view/87259