Characterizing two models for abortion care in Argentina pre-Law 27.610: 2016–2019

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2023057004993

Keywords:

Abortion, Induced, Healthcare Models, Self-Managed Abortion, Argentina

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Explore the use of two abortion care models in Argentina over the period 2016-2019: pro-rights private medical service providers and abortion accompaniment (via self-management and via health institutions); and compare the profile of who accesses these models and when. METHODS: We used data from accompaniment collectives in the Socorristas en Red and private service providers. We estimated annual abortion rates via these service models and compared the profile of the populations by type of service and gestational age (2019) using descriptive statistics and Chi-square tests. RESULTS: In 2016, 37 people per 100,000 women of reproductive age obtained accompanied self-managed abortions, and the number increased to 111 per 100,000 in 2019, a threefold increase. The rate of abortions via care providers was 18 per 100,000 in 2016 and 33 in 2019. Higher proportions of those who obtained abortion via care providers were 30 years or older. A higher proportion of those accompanied were 19 years or younger; 11% of those who obtained accompanied self-managed abortions were more than 12 weeks gestation compared with 7% among those who had accompanied abortions via health institutions and 0.2% among those who had abortions with private providers. A higher proportion of those who accessed accompanied abortions after 12 weeks gestation had lower educational levels, did not work or have social security coverage, had more past pregnancies, and attempted to terminate their pregnancies prior to contacting the Socorristas compared to those who had accompanied abortions at 12 weeks or earlier. CONCLUSIONS: In Argentina, prior to Law 27.610 models of care guaranteed access to safe abortions. It is important to continue making visible and legitimizing these models of care so that all those who decide to have an abortion, whether inside or outside health institutions, have safe and positive experience

References

Ley 27610, 30 dez 2020. Acceso a la interrupción voluntaria del embarazo. Boletín Oficial de la República Argentina, 15 ene 2021 [citado 5 ago 2022]. Disponible en: https://www.boletinoficial.gob.ar/detalleAviso/primera/239807/20210115

Alonso D, Brussino S. Abortion legalization and social representations of feminism in Argentina. Papers Social Representations. 2021;30(2):3.1-23.

Elizalde S, Mateo N. Las jóvenes: entre la “marea verde” y la decisión de abortar. Salud Colect. 2018;14(3):433-46. https://doi.org/10.18294/sc.2018.2026

Belló M, Becerril-Montekio VM. Sistema de salud de Argentina. Salud Publica Mex. 2011;53 Suppl 2:s96-108. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0036-36342011000800006

McReynolds-Pérez J. Abortion as empowerment: reproductive rights activism in a legally restricted context. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Nov;17(Suppl 2):350. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1498-y

Fernández Vázquez SS, Brown J. From stigma to pride: health professionals and abortion policies in the Metropolitan Area of Buenos Aires. Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2019 Nov;27(3):1691898. https://doi.org/10.1080/26410397.2019.1691898

Ruibal A, Fernandez Anderson C. Legal obstacles and social change: strategies of the abortion rights movement in Argentina. Polit Groups Identities. 2020;8(4):698-713. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2018.1541418

Organización Mundial de la Salud. Gobernanza. Documentos básicos. 49ª edición: con las modificaciones adoptadas hasta el 31 de mayo de 2019. Ginebra: Organización Mundial de la Salud; 2020 [citado 5 ago 2022]. Disponible en: https://apps.who.int/gb/bd/s/index.html

González Vélez AC. “The health exception”: a means of expanding access to legal abortion. Reprod Health Matters. 2012 Dec;20(40):22-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-8080(12)40668-1

McReynolds-Pérez J. No doctors required: lay activist expertise and pharmaceutical abortion in Argentina. Signs. 2017;42(2):349-75. https://doi.org/10.1086/688183

Socorristas en Red (feministas y transfeministas que abortamos). Quiénes somos. 2022 [citado 5 ago 2022]. Disponible en: https://socorristasenred.org/quienes-somos/

Moseson H, Jayaweera R, Raifman S, Keefe-Oates B, Filippa S, Motana R, et al. Self-managed medication abortion outcomes: results from a prospective pilot study. Reprod Health. 2020 Oct;17(1):164. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-020-01016-4

Ramos S, Romero M, Ramón Michel A. Health care providers’ opinions on abortion: a study for the implementation of the legal abortion public policy in the Province of Santa Fe, Argentina. Reprod Health. 2014 Sep;11(1):72. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-4755-11-72

Cascardo F, Robaina I, Testoni E, Trebotic G. Violencias en el acceso al aborto. Un acercamiento desde la red de profesionales por el derecho a decidir en la regionales Zona Oeste PBA y Mendoza. Buenos Aires: Observatorio de Géneros y Políticas Públicas; 2021 [citado 5 ago 2022. Disponible en: http://redsaluddecidir.org/2021/12/29/informe-violencias-en-acceso-al-aborto/

Szulik D, Zamberlin N. La legalidad oculta: Percepciones de estigma en los recorridos de mujeres que descubren y acceden a la interrupción legal del embarazo por causal salud. Sex, Salud Soc (Rio J). 2020;(34):46-67. https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-6487.sess.2020.34.04.a

Ramos S, Romero M, Ramón Michel A, Tiseyra MV, Vila Ortiz M. Experiencias y obstáculos que enfrentan las mujeres en el acceso al aborto. Buenos Aires: CEDES; 2020 [citado 5 ago 2022]. Disponible en: https://repositorio.cedes.org/handle/123456789/4580

Szulik DE, Zamberlin N. Trayectorias profesionales de médicos y médicas proveedores de interrupción legal del embarazo en Argentina [FLASOG]. Bol Feder Latinoam Soc Obstet Ginecol. 2017;5(3):6-14.

Vacarezza, Nayla Luz. 2022. Saberes y perspectivas activistas para la implementación de la ley de acceso a la interrupción voluntaria del embarazo. Jornadas de Investigación Instituto de Investigaciones Políticas/ Escuela de Política y Gobierno UNSAM, 19-21 abril 2022, Buenos Aires. San Martín: Unsam; 2022.

Romero M, Ramos S, Ramón Michel A, Keefe-Oates B, Rizzalli E. Proyecto mirar: a un año de la ley de aborto en Argentina. Buenos Aires: CEDES/Ibis Reproductive Health; 2021 [citado 5 ago 2022]. Disponible en: https://proyectomirar.org.ar/reporte/PROYECTO_MIRAR_reporte_aniversario_ley_VF.pdf

Baum S, DePiñeres T, Grossman D. Delays and barriers to care in Colombia among women obtaining legal first- and second-trimester abortion. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015 Dec;131(3):285-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.06.036

Foster DG, Kimport K. Who seeks abortions at or after 20 weeks? Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2013 Dec;45(4):210-8. https://doi.org/10.1363/4521013

Jones RK, Finer LB. Who has second-trimester abortions in the United States? Contraception. 2012 Jun;85(6):544-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2011.10.012

Zurbriggen R, Keefe-Oates B, Gerdts C. Accompaniment of second-trimester abortions: the model of the feminist Socorrista network of Argentina. Contraception. 2018 Feb;97(2):108-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2017.07.170

Mario S, Pantelides EA. Estimación de la magnitud del aborto inducido en la Argentina. Notas Población. 2009 [citado 5 ago 2022;35(87):95-120. Available from: https://repositorio.cepal.org/handle/11362/12842

Burton J. Números activistas: acerca de la producción de datos del activismo feminista que acompaña a mujeres que abortan con medicación. En: Panel 35 Feminismo y Políticas de Género. 8º Conferencia Latinoamericana y Caribeña de Ciencias Sociales: las luchas por la igualdad, la justicia social y la democracia em un mundo turbulento; Primer Foro Mundial del Pensamiento Crítico. 17-18 nov 2018 [citado 5 ago 2022; Buenos Aires, Argentina. Disponible en: https://www.clacso.org.ar/conferencia2018/presentacion_ponencia.php?ponencia=2018411135838-8446-pi

Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas y Censos (INDEC). Proyecciones de población por sexo y grupo de edad 2010-2040, para cada provincia. Buenos Aires: Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas y Censos; 2013 [citado 10 jun 2021]. Disponible en: https://www.indec.gob.ar/indec/web/Nivel4-Tema-2-24-85

Becker D, Diaz-Olavarrieta C, Juarez C, Garcia SG, Sanhueza Smith P, Harper CC. Sociodemographic factors associated with obstacles to abortion care: findings from a survey of abortion patients in Mexico City. Womens Health Issues. 2011;21(3 Suppl):S16-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2011.02.009

Bercu C, Moseson H, McReynolds-Pérez J, Wilkinson Salamea E, Grosso B, Trpin M, et al. In-person later abortion accompaniment: a feminist collective-facilitated self-care practice in Latin America. Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2021;29(3):2009103. https://doi.org/10.1080/26410397.2021.2009103

Socorristas en Red (feministas y transfeministas que abortamos). Acompañamientos a abortar realizados por SenRed durante el 1º semestre del 2021. Buenos Aires: Socorristas em Red; 2021 [citado 5 ago 2022]. Parte 3. Sobre acompañamientos a abortar en el sistema de salud. Socorristas en Red. Disponible en: https://socorristasenred.org/primer-semestre-2021/

Fernandez SS, Szwarc L. Aborto medicamentoso: transferencias militantes y transnacionalización de saberes en Argentina y América Latina. Reviise. 2018;12(12):163-77.

Veldhuis S, Sánchez‐Ramírez G, Darney BG. Locating autonomous abortion accompanied by feminist activists in the spectrum of self‐managed medication abortion. Stud Fam Plann. 2022 Jun;53(2):377-87. https://doi.org/10.1111/sifp.12194.

Yanow S, Pizzarossa LB, Jelinska K. Self-managed abortion: exploring synergies between institutional medical systems and autonomous health movements. Contraception. 2021 Sep;104(3):219-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2021.06.006

Díaz Olavarrieta C, Bonifaz Alfonzo L, Sanhueza-Smith P, Fajardo Dolci GE, Guevara-Guzmán R, Aburto-Arciniega MB, et al. Twelve years after abortion decriminalization in Mexico City: can we still remain an island of liberties? Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2020 Jan;62:63-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2019.07.009

Senderowicz L, Sanhueza P, Langer A. Education, place of residence and utilization of legal abortion services in Mexico City, 2013-2015. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2018 Jun;44(2):43–50. https://doi.org/10.1363/44e6318

Cárdenas R, Labandera A, Baum SE, Chiribao F, Leus I, Avondet S, et al. “It’s something that marks you”: abortion stigma after decriminalization in Uruguay. Reprod Health. 2018 Sep;15(1):150. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-018-0597-1

Ramón Michel A, Ariza Navarrete S. Objeción de conciencia y aborto: la libertad consciente. En: Ramos S, comp. Investigación sobre aborto en América Latina y El Caribe: una agenda renovada para informar políticas públicas e incidencia. Buenos Aires: Centro de Estudios de Estado y Sociedad-CEDES; 2015. p. 17.

Published

2023-06-22

Issue

Section

Original Articles

How to Cite

Atienzo, E. E., Grosso, B., Zurbriggen, R., Zambrano, D., Vivas, M., Keefe-Oates, B., Gerdts, C., & Wollum, A. (2023). Characterizing two models for abortion care in Argentina pre-Law 27.610: 2016–2019. Revista De Saúde Pública, 57(1), 36. https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2023057004993