Sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of hypertension with different methods

Authors

  • Larissa Rangel Nascimento Secretaria Municipal de Saúde
  • Anna Paula Coelli Secretaria Municipal de Saúde
  • Nágela Valadão Cade Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo; Departamento de Enfermagem
  • José Geraldo Mill UFES; Departamento de Ciências Fisiológicas
  • Maria del Carmen Bisi Molina UFES; Departamento de Nutrição

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89102011005000063

Keywords:

Hypertension, diagnosis, Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures, Sensitivity and Specificity, Cross-Sectional Studies

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate sensitivity and specificity of different protocols for blood pressure measurement for the diagnosis of hypertension in adults. METHODS: Cross-sectional study conducted in a non-probabilistic sample of 250 public servants of both sexes aged 35 to 74 years in Vitória, southeastern Brazil, between 2008 and 2010. The participants had their blood pressure measured using three different methods: clinic measurement, self-measured and 24-hour ambulatory measurement. They were all interviewed to obtain sociodemographic information and had their anthropometric data (weight, height, waist circumference) collected. Clinic measurement and self-measured were analyzed against the gold standard ambulatory measurement. Measures of diagnostic performance (sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and positive and negative predictive values) were calculated. The Bland & Altman method was used to evaluate agreement between ambulatory measurement (standard deviation for daytime measurements) and self-measured (standard deviation of four measurements). A 5% significance level was used for all analyses. RESULTS: Self-measured blood pressure showed higher sensitivity (S=84%, 95%CI 75;93) and overall accuracy (0.817, p<0.001) in the diagnosis of hypertension than clinic measurement (S=79%, 95%CI 73;86, and overall accuracy=0.815, p<0.001). Despite the strong correlation with daytime ambulatory measurement values (r=0.843, p<0.001), self-measured values did not show good agreement with daytime systolic ambulatory values (bias=5.82, 95%CI 4.49;7.15). Seven (2.8%) cases of white coat hypertension, 26 (10.4%) of masked hypertension and 46 (18.4%) of white-coat effect were identified. CONCLUSIONS: The study shows that self-measured blood pressure has higher sensitivity than clinic measurement to identify true hypertension. The negative predictive values found confirm the superiority of self-measured when compared to clinic in identifying truly normotensive individuals. However, clinic measurement cannot be replaced with self-measured, as it is still the most reliable method for the diagnosis of hypertension.

Published

2011-10-01

Issue

Section

Original Articles

How to Cite

Nascimento, L. R., Coelli, A. P., Cade, N. V., Mill, J. G., & Molina, M. del C. B. (2011). Sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of hypertension with different methods . Revista De Saúde Pública, 45(5), 837-844. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89102011005000063