Enzymatic activity of lipase in post-metamorphic phase bullfrogs

Authors

  • Luís Gustavo Tavares Braga UESC; DCAA
  • Maria Goreti de Almeida Oliveira UFV; BIOAGRO; Lab. de Enzimologia
  • William Cardoso Lima UFV; Depto. de Química
  • Ricardo Frederico Euclydes UFV; Depto. de Zootecnia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-90162006000500004

Keywords:

digestive enzyme, frog culture, specific activity

Abstract

The knowledge of the digestive system of bullfrogs is an important step for the determination of their nutritional requirements throughout growth phases. With the objective of evaluating the enzymatic activity of lipase in the intestinal content of bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana Shaw, 1802), 100 animals with median weight of 3.6 g were distributed in stalls under controlled temperature and photoperiod. The frogs, selected at the post-metamorphic phase, received commercial extruded diet ad libitum throughout the 87-day experiment. The collections of the intestinal content were performed by the desensitization of the frogs in ice and water at 0ºC and subsequent isolation of the small intestine. Determination of lipase activity was performed with a commercial enzymatic kit (Lipase-Bioclin, MG, Brazil), first measured in samples taken at day three (3.46 UI). During the initial phase the bullfrog possesses low lipase hydrolysis capacity was found, having a specific activity of 217 UI mg-1. In the subsequent period both lipase activity and specific lipase activity continuously increased. Lipase activity as a function of bullfrog weight fell after day twenty and reached 0.33 UI g-1, for frogs of medium weight (179 g). Feed for bullfrogs at the post-metamorphic phase weighing more than 10 g can have larger amounts of ingredients containg lipids, due to the increased digestive capacity of these frogs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2006-10-01

Issue

Section

Animal Science and Pastures

How to Cite

Enzymatic activity of lipase in post-metamorphic phase bullfrogs . (2006). Scientia Agricola, 63(5), 439-443. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-90162006000500004