Clinical trials, social movements, and bioactivism: notes for a(nother) genealogy of the Brazilian system of research ethics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-12902022220055ptKeywords:
Research ethics, Social movements, Social activism, Biomedical technology, Science, technology, and societyAbstract
A significant part of the literature on the genesis of Brazilian institutions dedicated to the ethical regulation of scientific research involving human beings usually goes back to international events, such as those that occurred during and after the II World War, as triggers of a global ethical conscience of which Brazil would have taken part. Based on review of literature and a resource of genealogical approach, I investigate how certain events that occurred in our country, such as the actions of social movements in the face of clinical trials with Norplant in the 1980s and with antiretrovirals in the 1990s, are fundamental for understanding the different moments of institutionalization of research ethics in Brazil and its political orientations. Based on the reconstruction of these episodes, I argue that the particular contents of public agendas on biomedical scientific practices were anchored in specific contexts of contestation led by social movements, whose political demands were described in notably ethical terms. The historical configuration of research ethics in Brazil combines subjects, factors, and political struggles that give it a dynamic character. Understanding this context requires considering the actions of social movements aimed at the regulation of clinical trials.