Modality, the semantic approach and quantum mechanics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-31662004000100004Keywords:
Semantic approach, Quantuum mechanics, Modality, Van Fraassen, Constructive empiricismAbstract
According to the indispensability argument, we ought to be ontologically committed to mathematical entities, given that they are indispensable to our best scientific theories. Hartry Field (1980) has famously resisted the argument, developing a program to reformulate scientific theories without quantification over mathematical objects. In particular, Field worked out in detail the nominalization of Newtonian gravitacional theory, indicating how the theory could be formulated without quantification over real numbers. Field also provided an argument why the use of modal operators doesn't providean adequate strategy to nominalize scientific theories. In this paper, I discuss Field's argument against the claim that modality can be a general surrogate for ontology. After resisting this argument, I indicate an alternative picture that makes it clear why modality can play such a role.Downloads
Published
2004-03-01
Issue
Section
Artigos
License
A revista detém os direitos autorais de todos os textos nela publicados. Os autores estão autorizados a republicar seus textos mediante menção da publicação anterior na revista.How to Cite
Modality, the semantic approach and quantum mechanics . (2004). Scientiae Studia, 2(1), 85-97. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-31662004000100004