Interpretações da teoria marxista do valor: uma revisão da literatura
Palavras-chave:
teoria marxista do valor, valor trabalho, MarxResumo
Este artigo analisa criticamente duas interpretações da teoria marxista do valor, as abordagens do 'trabalho incorporado', incluindo o 'marxismo tradicional' e as análises srafianas e as teorias da forma do valor, incluindo aquelas associadas com Rubin e a 'nova interpretação'.
Downloads
Referências
AGLIETTA, M..A theory ofcapitalist regulation, the US experience. London: New Left Books, 1979.
ALBBJTTON, R. A Japanese reconstruction of marxist theory. London: Macmillan, 1986.
ALTHUSSER, L. ForMarx. London: New Left Books, 1969.
ALTHUSSER, L. Reading capital. London: New Left Books, 1970.
ARTHUR, C. Against the logical-historical method: dialectical derivation versus linear logic. In: MOSELEY, E; CAMPBELL, M. {tds.),New investigations ofMarx}s method. Atlantic Highlands: Humanities Press, 1997.
BACKHAUS, H.-G. Dialectique de la forme valeur. Critiques de PEconomie Politique, 18, p. 5-33, 1974.
BENETTI, C.; CARTELIER, J. Marchands, salariat et capitalistes. Paris: Maspero, 1980.
BOHM-BAWERK, E. VON. Karl Marx and the close of his system. In: SWEEZY, P. M. (ed.), Karl Marx and the close ofhis system. Clifton: A.M. Kelley, 1949.
BORTKIEWICZ, L. VON. On the correction of Marx's fundamental theoretical construction on the third volume of Capital. In: SWEEZY, P. M. {ed.), KarlMarx and the close ofhis system. Clifton: A. M. Kelley, 1949.
BORTKIEWICZ, L. VON. Values and prices in the Marxian system. International Economic
Papers 2, p. 5-60, 1952.
BOWLES, S.; GINTIS, H. Labour heterogeneity and the labour theory of value, a reply. CambridgeJournal ofEconomics v. 5, n. 3, p. 285-288, 1981.
BRENNER, R. The social basis ofeconomic development. In: ROEMER, J. {ed.).Analytical marxism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.
BRODY, A. Proportions, prices andplanning: a mathematical restatement of the labour theory ofvalue. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1974.
BRUNHOFF, S. de. Lapolitiquemonetaire, un essai d}interpretation marxiste.
Paris: Presses Universitaires de France,1973a.
BRUNHOFF, S. Marx as an a-Ricardian, value, money and price at the beginning of "Capital". Economy &Society, v. 2, n. 3, p. 412-430,1973b.
BRUNHOFF, S.Marxon money. New York: Urizen Books, 1976.
L'equilibre ou la monnaie. Economic Appliquee, v. 31, n. 1-2, p. 35-59,1978a.
BRUNHOFF, S. La monnaie, puissance sociale, puissance privee. Economies et Societes, 1, p. 2163-2186,1978b.
CATEPHORES, G. The historical transformation problem, a reply. InFINE, B. (ed.), The value dimension. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1986.
CHATTOPADHYAY, P Surplus school and Marx: On GaregnanTs Marx reading, inedito, 2000.
DESAI, M. The transformation problem. In: CARAVALE, G. A. (ed.), Marx and modern economic analysis. Aldershot: Edward Elgar, 1992.
DMITRIEV, VEconomic essays on value, competition and utility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1974.
DOBB, M. Political economy and capitalism. London: Roudedge and Kegan Paul, 1940.
DOBB, M. Review of theory of capitalist development, by Paul M. Sweezy.
Science <&Society 7, p. 270-275,1943.
DOBB, M. Marx's "Capital" and its place in economic thought. Science & Society, v. 31, n. 4, p. 527-540,1967.
DOSTALER, G.; LAGUEUX, M. (eds.) Un echiquier centenaire, theoriede la valeur etformation desprix. Paris: La Decouverte, 1985.
DUMENIL, G.De la valeur auxprix deproduction. Paris: Economica, 1980.
DUMENIL, G. Beyond the transformation riddle: a labor theory ofvalue. Science
and Society, v. 33, n. 4, p. 427-450,1983-84.
DUMENIL, G. The so-called "transformation problem" revisited, a brief
commtnt.Journal ofEconomic Theory, 33, p. 340-348,1984.
DUMENIL, G.; LEVY, D. Szumski's validation of the labour theory of value, a comment. CambridgeJournal ofEconomics, v, 15, n. 3, p. 359- 364,1991.
EHRBAR, H. Mathematics and the labor theory ofvalue. Review ofRadical Political Economics, v. 21, n. 3, p. 7-12,1989.
ELDRED, M. A reply to Gleicher. Capital&Class 23, p. 135-137,1984. ELDRED, M.; HANLON, M. Reconstructing value-form analysis. Capital &Class 13, p. 24-60, 1981.
ELSON, D. (ed.) Value, the representation oflabour in capitalism. London; CSE Books, 1979a.
ELSON, D. The value theory of labour. In: ELSON, D. (ed.), Value, the representation oflabour in capitalism. London: CSE Books, 1979b.
ENGELS, E Supplement. In K. Marx, Capital 3. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1981.
FACCARELLO, G. Sraffa versus Ricardo, the historical irrelevance of the "corn-profit" model.In: FINE,B. (ed.), Thevaluedimension. London: Roudedge & Kegan Paul, 1986.
FINE, B. Economic theory and ideology. London: Edward Arnold, 1980.
FINE, B. Theories ofthe capitalist economy. London: Edward Arnold, 1982.
FINE, B. (ed.) The value dimension, MarxversusRicardo and Sraffa. London: Roudedge and Kegan Paul, 1986a.
FINE, B. On the historical transformation Problem. Jw: Thevalue dimension. London: Roudedge 8c Kegan Paul, 1986b.
FINE, B. The continuing imperative ofvalue theory: apersonal account. Inedito, 1996.
FINE, B.; HARRIS, L. Rereading capital. London: Macmillan, 1979.
FINE, B.; LAPAVITSAS, C.; SAAD FILHO, A. Transforming the transformation problem: why the "new solution" is a wrong turning. Inedito, 2000.
FLASCHEL, P. The so-called "transformation problem" revisited, a comment.Journal of Economic Theory 33, p. 349-351,1984.
FOLEY, D. The value ofmoney, the value of labour power and the marxian transformation problem. Review ofRadical Political Economics, v. 14, n. 2, p. 37-47,1982.
FOLEY, D. On Marx's theory of money. Social Concept, v. 1, n. 1, p. 5-19, 1983.
. Understanding capital, Marx's economic theory. Cambridge, Mass.:
Harvard University Press, 1986.
FOLEY, D. Recent developments in the labor theory of value. Review of Radical Political Economics, v. 32, n. 1, p. 1-39, 2000.
FREEMAN, A.; CARCHEDI, G. (eds.) Marx and non-equilibrium economics. Aldershot: Edward Elgar, 1996.
GANSSMANN, H. Transformation of physical conditions of production, Steedman's economic metaphysics. ln FINE, B. (ed.), The value dimension. London: Roudedge 8c Kegan Paul, 1986.
GAREGNANI, P. La theorie classique de la repartition et le probleme dit de la "transformation" chez Marx. In: DOSTALER, G.; LAGUEUX,
M. (eds.), Un echiquier centenaire, theorie de la valeur etformation des prix. Paris: La Decouverte, 1985.
GERSTEIN, I. Production, circulation and value, the significance of the "transformation problem" in Marx's critique of political economy. In: FINE, B. (ed.), The value dimension. London: Roudedge 8c Kegan Paul, 1986.
GLEICHER, D. Note: a rejoinder to Eldred. Capital&Class 24, p. 147-155,1985.
GLEICHER, D. The ontology of labour values. Science &Society, v. 49, n. 4, p. 463-471,1985-86
GLICK, M.; EHRBAR, H. The labour theory of value and its critics. Science &Society, v. 50, n. 4, p. 464-478,1986-87.
GLEICHER, D. The transformation problem, an obituary. Australian Economic Papers, v. 26, n. 49, p. 294-317, 1987.
GOODE, P. The law of value and Marx's method. Bulletin ofthe Conference ofSocialist Economists, v. 2, n. 6, p. 65-69, 1973.
GUTTMAN, R. How credit-money shapes the economy: the United States in a global system. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe, 1994.
HABEBXER, G. Marxian economics in retrospect and prospect. Zeitschrift furNationalokdnomie, 26, p. 69-82, 1966.
HARVEY, D. The limits to capital. London: Verso, 1999.
HIMMELWEIT, S.; MOHUN, S. The anomalies of capital. Capital & Class 6, p. 67-105,1978.
HODGSON, G. Marxian epistemology and the transformation problem. Economy &Society, v. 3, n. 4, p. 357-392,1974.
HODGSON, G. Money and the Sraffa system.Australian Economic History Review, v. 20, n. 36, p. 83-95, 1981.
HOWARD, M. C.; KING, J. E. A history of marxian economics. 2 Vols. London: Macmillan, 1989,1991.
ILYENKOV, E. V The dialectics of the abstract and the concrete in Marx's 'Capital'. Moscow: Progress Publishers, 1982.
KLIMAN, A.; McGLONE, T. The transformation non-problem and the non-transformation problem. Capital &Class 35, p. 56-83, 1988.
LALBMAN, D. Values and price of production, the political economy of the transformation problem. Science&Society, v. 37, n. 4, p. 404-436, 1973.
LEE, C.-O. Marx's labour theory of value revisited. Cambridge Journal of Economics, v. 17, n. 4, p. 463-478, 1993.
LIPIETZ, A. The so-called "transformation problem" revisited. Journal of Economic Theory, v. 26, n. 1, p. 59-88,1982.
LIPIETZ, A. The so-called "transformation problem" revisited, a brief reply to brief comments.Journal ofEconomic Theory, v. 33, n. 2, p. 352-355, 1984.
The enchanted world: inflation, credit and the world crises. London: Verso, 1985a.
LIPIETZ, A. Le debar sur la valeur: bilan partiel et perspectives partiales. In
DOSTALER, G.; LAGUEUX, M. (eds.), Un echiquier centenaire, theorie de la valeur etformation desprix. Paris: La Decouverte, 1985b.
LIKITKIJSOMBOON, P. Marxian theories of value-form. Review of Radical Political Economics, v. 27, n. 2, p. 73-105,1995.
MANDEL, E.; FREEMAN, A. (eds.) Ricardo, Marx, Sraffa. London: Verso, 1984.
MARX, K. Critique of the Gotha programme. ln Thefirst international and after. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1974.
MARX, K. Theories ofsurplus value. 3 Vols. London: Lawrence and Wishart, 1978a, 1969,1972.
MARX, K. Grundrisse. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1981a.
MARX, K. Capital. 3 Vols. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1976,1978b, 1981b.
MARX, K.A contribution to the critique ofpolitical economy. Collected Works, Vol. 29, London: Lawrence and Wishart, 1987.
MATTICK, P. JR. Some aspects of the value-price problem. International Journal of Political Economy, v. 21, n. 4, p. 9-66,1991-92.
MAY, K. Value and price of production, a note on Winternitz's solution. Economic Journal 58, p. 596-599,1948.
MEEK, R. L. Some notes on the "transformation problem". Economic Journal 66, p. 94-107,1956.
MEEK, R. L. Studies in the labour theory ofvalue. London: Lawrence and Wishart, 1973.
MILONAKIS, D. Historical aspects ofthe law ofvalue and the transition to capitalism. 1990. PhD Thesis, University of London.
MOHUN, S. Value. In: BOTTOMORE, T. (ed.),HDictionary of Marxist Thought, 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell, 1991.
MOHUN, S. Are(in)statement of the labour theory ofvalue. Cambridge Journal of Economics 18, p. 391-412,1994.
MOHUN, S. New solution or reinstatement? A reply. Cambridge Journal of Economics, v. 24, n. 1, p. 113-117, 2000.
MOHUN, S. Productive and unproductive labor: a reply to Houston and Laibman. Review of Radical Political Economics (no prelo).
MORISHIMA, M. MarxJs economics - A dual theory ofvalue andgrowth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973.
Marx in the light of modern economic theory. Econometrica, v. 42,n. 4, p. 611-632,1974.
MOSELEY, E Abstract labor: substance orform?A critique ofthe value-form interpretation of Marx's theory. Inedito, 1997.
NAPLES, M. A radical economic revision of the transformation problem. Review ofRadical Political Economics, v. 21, n. 1-2, p. 137-158, 1989.
NUTI, D. M. The transformation of labor values into production prices and the mandan theory ofexploitation. In SCHWARTZ, J. G. (ed.), The subtle anatomy ofcapitalism. Santa Monica: Goodyear, 1977.
PASINETTI, L. Lectures on the theory ofproduction. New York: Columbia University Press, 1977.
PILLING, G. The law of value in Ricardo and Marx. Economy&Society, v. 1, n. 3, p. 281-307,1972.
PILLING, G. Marx's 'Capital', philosophy and political economy. London: Roudedge and Kegan Paul, 1980.
POSTONE, M. Time, labour and social domination, a re-examination of Marx's critical theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.
RAMOS-MARTINEZ, A.; RODRIGUEZ-HERRERA, A. The transformation of values into prices of production: a different reading of Marx's text. In FREEMAN, A.; CARCHEDI, G. (eds.), Marx
and non-equilibrium. Aldershot: Edward Elgar, 1996.
REINFELDER, M. Breaking the spell of technicism. In: SLATER, P. (ed.), Outlines of a critique of technology. Atlantic Highlands: Humanities Press, 1980.
REUTEN, G. The difficult labor of a theory of social value, metaphors and systematic dialectics at the beginning of Marx's "Capital". In: MOSELEY, E (ed.), Marx's method in 'Capital', a reexamination. Atlantic Highlands, N.J., Humanities Press, 1993.
REUTEN, G. Conceptual collapses: a note on value-form theory. Review of Radical Political Economics, v. 27, n. 3, p. 104-110, 1995.
REUTEN, G.; WILLIAMS, M. Value-form and the state, the tendencies of accumulation and the determination ofeconomicpolicy in capitalist society. London: Routledge, 1989.
ROBERTS, B. Marx after Steedman, separating marxism from "surplus theory". Capital &Class 32, p. 84-103,1987.
ROOSEVELT, E Cambridge economics as commodity fetishism. In: SCHWARTZ, J.G. (ed.), The subtle anatomy ofcapitalism. Santa Monica: Goodyear, 1977.
ROWTHORN, B. Capitalism, conflict and inflation. London: Lawrence and Wishart, 1980.
RUBIN, I, I. Essays onMarx's theory ofvalue. Montreal: Black Rose Books, 1975.
RUBIN, I, I. Abstract labour and value in Marx's system. Capital&Class 5, p. 107-140,1978.
RUBIN, I, I. A history ofeconomic thought. London: Pluto Press, 1979.
SAAD FILHO, A. Labour, money and "labour-money", a review of Marx's critique ofJohn Gray's monetary analysis. History ofPoliticalEconomy v. 25, n. 1, p. 65-84,1993a.
SAAD FILHO, A.A note on Marx's analysis of the composition of capital. Capital &Class 50, p. 127-146,1993b.
SAAD FILHO, A. The value ofmoney, the value of labour power and the net product, an appraisal of the "new approach" to the transformation problem. In: FREEMAN, A.; CARCHEDI, G. (eds.), Marx and nonequilibrium economics. Aldershot: Edward Elgar, 1996.
SAAD FILHO, A. Concrete and abstract labour in Marx's theory of value. Review of Political Economy, v. 9, n. 4, p. 457-477,1997a.
SAAD FILHO, A. An alternative reading of the transformation ofvalues into prices of production. Capital and Class 63, p. 115-136,1997b.
SAAD FILHO, A. Inflation theory: a critical literature review and a new research agenda. Research in Political Economy 18, p. 335-362, 2000.
SAAD FILHO, A. The value ofMarx: political economy for contemporary capitalism. London: Routiedge, 2002.
SAAD FILHO, A.; LAPAVITSAS, C. A teoria horizontalista da moeda e do credito: uma analise cntica. EstudosEconomicos, v. 29, n. 1, p. 23-45, jan./mar. 1999.
SAMUELSON, P. M. Wages and interest, a modern dissection of marxian economic modds.American Economic Review, v. 47, n. 6, p. 884-912, 1957.
SAMUELSON, P. M. Understanding the marxian notion of exploitation, a summary
of the so-called transformation problem between marxian values and competitive prices. Journal ofEconomic Literature, v. 9, n. 2, p. 399- 431, 1971.
SAMUELSON, P. M. Reply on marxian matters. Journal ofEconomic Literature, v. 11, ^Tl, p. 64-68,1973.
SAMUELSON, P. M. Insight and detour in the theory ofexploitation, a reply to Baumol.
Journal ofEconomic Literature, v. 12, n. 1, p. 62-70,1974.
SAVRAN, S. On the theoretical consistency of Sraffa's economics. Capital &Class 7, p. 131-140,1979.
SAVRAN, S. On confusions concerning Sraffa (and Marx), reply to critics. Capital &Class 12, p. 85-98, 1980.
SAVRAN, S. The negation of negative values. In: MANDEL, E.; FREEMAN, A. (eds.) Ricardo, Marx, Sraffa. London: Verso, 1984.
SCHWARTZ, J. G. (ed.) The subtle anatomy ofcapitalism. Santa Monica: Goodyear, 1977.
SETON, E The "transformation problem". Review ofEconomic Studies 24, p. 149-160,1957.
SHAIKH, A. Marx's theory of value and the "transformation problem". In: SCHWARTZ, J. G. (ed.), The subtle anatomy ofcapitalism. Santa Monica: Goodyear, 1977.
SHAIKH, A. The poverty of algebra. In: STEEDMAN, I. (ed.), The value controversy. London: Verso, 1981.
SHAIKH, A. Neo-ricardian economics, a wealth of algebra, a poverty oftheory. Review ofRadical Political Economicsyr. 14, n. 2, p. 67-83, 1982.
SHAIKH, A. The transformation from Marx to Sraffa'. In: MANDEL, E.; FREEMAN, A. Ricardo, Marx, Sraffa. London: Verso, 1984.
SHAIKH, A. Values and value transfers: a comment on Itoh. In: ROBERTS, B.; FEINER, S. {eds.). Radical economics. Boston: Kluwer, 1991.
SHIBATA, K. The meaning of the theory ofvalue in theoretical economics. Kyoto University Economic Review, v. 8, n. 2, p. 49-68,1933.
SMITH, M. Invisible leviathan: the marxist critique ofmarket despotism beyond postmodernism. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1994a.
SMITH, M. Alienation, exploitation and abstract labor: a humanist defense of Marx's theory of value. Review ofRadical Political Economics, v. 26, n. 1, p. 110-133,1994b.
SMITH, T. The logic ofMarxh 'CapitaP, reply to hegelian criticisms. Albany: State of New York Press, 1990.
SMITH, T. Value theory and dialectics. Science &Society, v. 62, n. 3, p. 460-470,1998.
SRAFFA, P. Production ofcommodities by means ofcommodities: prelude to a critique ofeconomic theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1960.
STAMATIS, G. On the "new solution". International Journal ofPolitical
Economy, v. 28, n. 4, p.23-46,1998-99.
STEEDMAN, I. Marx after Sraffa. London: New Left Books, 1977.
STEEDMAN, I. (ed.) The value controversy. London: Verso, 1981.
SWEEZY, P. Introduction. In: KarlMarxand the close ofhis system. Clifton: AM. Kelley. 1949
SWEEZY, P. Teoria do desenvolvimento capitalista. 5a ed. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar, 1982.
SZUMSKI, J. On Dumenil and Levy's denial of the existence of the socalled transformation problem, a reply. CambridgeJournal ofEconomics, v. 15, n. 3, p. 365-371,1991.
TUGAN-BARANOVSKY, M. I. Theoretischegrundlagen des marxismus. Leipzig: Doucker und Humboldt, 1905.
UNO, K. Principles ofpolitical economy: theory ofa purely capitalist society. Brighton: Harvester Press, 1980.
VROEY, M. de. Value, production and exchange. In: STEEDMAN, I. (ed.), The value controversy. London: Verso, 1981.
VROEY, M. de. On the obsolescence of the mandan theory of value, a critical review. Capital &Class 17, p. 34-59, 1982.
VROEY, M. de. La theorie marxiste de la valeur, version travail abstrait, un bilan critique. In: DOSTALER G.; LAGUEUX, M. (eds.), Un echiquier centenaire, theorie de la valeur etformation desprix. Paris: La Decouverte, 1985.
WEEKS, J. Capital and exploitation. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1981.
WEEKS, J. A note on underconsumptionist theory and the labor theory of value. Science &Society, v. 46, n. 1, p. 60-76, 1982b.
WEEKS, J. On the issue of capitalist circulation and the concepts appropriate to its analysis. Science &Society, v. 48, n. 2, p. 214-225, 1983.
WEEKS, J. Abstract labor and commodity production. Research in Political Economy 12, p. 3-19, 1990.
WINTERNITZ, J. Values and prices, a solution to the so-called transformation problem. Economic Journal, v. 58, n. 2, p. 276-280, 1948.
WOLFF, R. UnderstandingMarx: a reconstruction and critique of'Capital. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984.
Value and price in Marx's "Capital". Revolutionary Communist 1, p. 31-49, 1974.
WOLFF, R. Value, price and the neo-ricardians: an introductory note. In: MOHUN, S. (ed.), Debates in value theory. London; Macmillan, 1995.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2001 Alfredo Saad Filho
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
A submissão de artigo autoriza sua publicação e implica o compromisso de que o mesmo material não esteja sendo submetido a outro periódico.
A revista não paga direitos autorais aos autores dos artigos publicados.
O detentor dos direitos autorais da revista é o Departamento de Economia da Faculdade de Economia, Administração, Contabilidade e Atuária da Universidade de São Paulo.
