Diferenciais de utilização do cuidado de saúde no sistema suplementar brasileiro

Authors

  • Monica Viegas Andrade Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais Author
  • Ana Carolina Maia Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-41612009000100001

Keywords:

moral hazard, health system, demand for health services

Abstract

This paper investigates the existence of differentials of healthcare utilization between private and non private insured individuals using a counter-factual analysis. We estimate healthcare utilization for 1998 and 2003. Two variables of healthcare utilization have been selected: medical visits and the number of inpatient days. The main findings suggest a positive differential of utilization for private insured individuals. The magnitude of these differentials varies across types of medical care. Considering medical visits we found that each individual in the private sector uses 25% more services than if they only have access to healthcare services through public sector and for inpatient days this percentage is lower, around 10%.We use three different procedures to deal with the endogeneity of private insurance decision. Our findings are very robust and in accordance with international empirical evidence.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ABADIE, A.; IMBENS, G. Large sample properties of matching estimators for

average treatment effects. Econometrica, 74 (1), p. 235-267, 2006.

ANS - Agência Nacional de Saúde Suplementar. Disponível em: http://www.ans.gov.br.

BARROS, P. P.; Machado , M. P.; Sanz-de-Galdeano, A. Moral hazard and the demand for health services: a matching estimator approach. Journal of Health Economics, 2007, doi:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2008.02.007

CAMERON, A. C. et al. A microeconomic model of the demand for health care and health insurance in Australia. Review of Economic Studies. v. 55, n. 1, p. 85-106, 1988.

CHIAPPORI, Pierre-André et al. Moral hazard and the demand for physician services:

First lessons from a French natural experiment. European Economic Review, n.42, p 499-511, 1998.

CUTLER, D. M.; ZECKHAUSER, R. J. The anatomy of health insurance. In: CULYER, A. J.; NEWHOUSE, J.P. (Org.). Handbook of health economics. Amsterdam: North-Holland Press, 2000. p. 563-643.

JONES, Andrew. Applied econometrics for health economists – a practical guide. Office of Health Economics, London, 2001.

MANNING, W. G. et al. Health insurance and the demand for medical care: evidence

from a randomized experiment. American Economic Review, 77 (3), p. 251-277, 1987.

NEWHOUSE, Joseph P. et al. Free for all? Lessons from the RAND health insurance

experiment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, 1993.

NORONHA, K V. M. S.; ANDRADE, M. V. Desigualdades sociais em saúde: evidências

empíricas sobre o caso brasileiro. Revista Econômica do Nordeste, Fortaleza, v. 32, p. 877-897, 2001.

NYMAN, J. A. The value of health insurance: the access motive. Journal of Health Economics 18, p.141-152, 1999.

PAULY, M. V.; HELD, P. J. Benign moral hazard and the cost-effectiveness analysis of insurance coverage. Journal of Health Economics 9, p. 447-461, 1990.

SAPELLI, C.; VIAL, B. Self-selection end moral hazard in Chilean health insurance. Journal of Health Economics 830, p.1-18, 2003.

SAVAGE, E.; WRIGHT, D. J. Moral hazard and adverse selection in Australian private hospitals. Journal of Health Economics 826, p.1-29, 2002.

STANCIOLI, A. E. Incentivos e risco moral nos planos de saúde no Brasil. 2002. Dissertação

(Mestrado em Economia). Orientador: Hélio Zylberstajn. Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade da USP, 81 p.

ZWEIFEL, P.; MANNING, Willard G. Moral hazard and consumer incentives in health care. In: CULYER, A. J., NEWHOUSE, J.P. (Org.). Handbook of health economics. Amsterdam: North-Holland Press, 2000. p. 410-459.

Published

31-03-2009

Issue

Section

Não definida

How to Cite

Andrade, M. V., & Maia, A. C. (2009). Diferenciais de utilização do cuidado de saúde no sistema suplementar brasileiro . Estudos Econômicos (São Paulo), 39(1), 7-38. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-41612009000100001