Methods used to evaluate the en dehors or turnout of dancers and classical ballet dancers: a literature review

Authors

  • Kaanda Nabilla Souza Gontijo Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul; Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências do Movimento Humano
  • Maiane Almeida do Amaral Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul; Curso de Fisioterapia
  • Gabriela Cristina dos Santos Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul; Curso de Educação Física
  • Claudia Tarragô Candotti Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul; Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências do Movimento Humano

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-2950/17100124042017

Keywords:

Dance, Evaluation Studies, Evaluation

Abstract

The classical ballet technique requires the maximum en dehors or turnout, which is the lower limbs external rotation. Considering its importance, several evaluation and measurement protocols have been proposed. This review aims to investigate systematically which methods were used to assess the classical dancers’ or classical ballet practitioners’ turnout. A systematic search was made in the Scopus, Science Direct, and PubMed databases in February 2016 for studies written in English that evaluated classical dancers or ballerinas, and the en dehors or turnout was measured. We found 593 articles, of which 25 were pre-selected for this review, featuring fifteen different methods and instruments for measuring turnout: kinemetry; inclinometer; Turnout Protractor, or protractor to measure the turnout; goniometer; dupuis tropometer; original protractor; subjects photos; rotational discs; Nicholas flexibility test; fleximeter; clinical drawing of the feet; subject standing on a piece of paper, or soil, or whiteboard; magnetic resonance; filming the subject during a sequence of dance steps; Dasco pro angle finder. This review rovides convincing evidence that there is not a method or gold-standard instrument for measuring dancers’ turnout, therefore such measurement is usually adapted and chosen according to each study objectives.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Negus V, Hopper D, Briffa NK. Associations between turnout

and lower extremity injuries in classical ballet dancers. J

Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2005;35(5):307-18. doi:10.2519/

jospt.2005.35.5.307

Clippinger K. Biomechanical considerations in turnout. In:

Solomon R, Solomon J, Minton, SC, editors. Preventing

dance injuries. 2nd ed. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 2005. p.

-50.

Kravitz SR, Murgia CJ, Huber S, Saltrick K. Biomechanical

implications of dance injuries. In: Shell C, editor. Dancer as

athlete. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 1984. p. 43-51.

LiGreci-Mangini LA. Comparison of hip range of motion

between professional ballerinas and age-/sex-matched nondancers. Kinesiol Med Dance. 1993-1994;16:19-30.

Grossman G, Waninger KN, Voloshin A, Reinus WR, Ross

R, Stoltzfus J, et al. Reliability and validity of goniometric

turnout measurements compared with MRI and retroreflective markers. In: Solomon R, Solomon J, editors.

Proceedings of the 16th Annual meeting of the International

Association for J Dance Medicine & Science; 2006 Oct 19-

; West Palm Beach Marriot, West Palm Beach. West Palm

Beach: Int Assoc J Dance Med Sci. 2008;12(4):142-52.

Hamilton W, Hamilton L, Marshall P, Molnar M. A profile of

the musculoskeletal characteristics of elite professional

ballet dancers. Am J Sports Med. 1992;20(3):267-73.

doi:10.1177/036354659202000306

Grossman G. Measuring dancer’s active and passive turnout.

J Dance Med Sci. 2003;7:49-55.

Stephens RE. The etiology of ijuries in ballet. In: Ryan AJ,

Stephens RE, editors. Dance Medicine: a comprehensive

guide. Chicago: Pluribus Press; 1987. p. 16-50.

Gupta A, Fernihough B, Bailey G, Bombeck P, Clarke A,

Hopper D. An evaluation of differences in hip external

rotation strength and range of motion between female

dancers and non-dancers. Br J Sports Med. 2004;38(6):778-

doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2003.010827

Shah S, Weiss D. Survey of injuries among professional

modern dancers: prevalence, risk factors and management.

Clin J Sports Med. 2006;16(5):437-49.

Schon LC, Weinfield SB. Lower extremity musculoskeletal

problems in dance. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 1996;8(2):130-42.

Cimelli SN, Curran SA. Influence of turnout on foot posture

and its relationship to overuse musculoskeletal injury

in professional contemporary dancers: a preliminary

investigation. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2012;102(1):25-33.

doi: 10.7547/1020025

Weiss DS, Shah S, Burchette RJ. A profile of the demographics

and training characteristics of professional modern dancers.

J Dance Med Sci. 2008;12(2):41-6.

Stretanski MF, Weber GJ. Medical and rehabilitation issues in

classical ballet. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;81(5):383-91.

doi: 10.1097/00002060-200205000-00013

Kushner S, Saboe L, Reid D, Penrose T, Grace M.

Relationship of turnout to hip abduction in professional

ballet dancers. Am J Sports Med. 1990;18(3):286-91. doi:

1177/036354659001800312

Thomas H, Tarr J. Dancer’s perceptions of pain and

injury: positive and negative effects. J Dance Med Sci.

;13(2):51-9.

Macintyre J, Joy E. Foot and ankle injuries in dance. Clin Sports

Med. 2000;19(2):351-68. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2006.06.006

Ahonen J. Biomechanics of the foot in dance: a literature

review. J Dance Med Sci. 2008;12(3):99-108.

Welsh RTM, Rodriguez M, Beare LW, Barton B, Judge T.

Assessing turnout in university dancers. J Dance Med Sci.

;12(4):136-41.

Coplan JA. Ballet dancer’s turnout and its relationship to selfreported injury. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2002;32(11):579-

doi: 10.2519/jospt.2002.32.11.579

Khan K, Roberts P, Nattrass C, Bennell K, Mayes S, Way S,

et al. Hip and ankle range of motion in elite classical ballet

dancers and controls. Clin J Sport Med. 1997;7(3):174-9. doi:

1097/00042752-199707000-00004

Liederbach M, Welsh T, Hagins M. Analysis of dancer

screening forms used in the dance medicine community.

In: Solomon R, Solomon J, editors. Proceedings of the 16th

Annual Meeting of the International Association for Dance

Medicine & Science; 2006 Oct 19-21; West Palm Beach

Marriot, West Palm Beach. West Palm Beach: IADMS; 2006.

p. 146-50.

Molnar M. Dynamic evaluation of the student dancer:

enhancement of healthy functioning and movement quality.

Impulse. 1995;3(4):287-95.

Watkins A, Woodhull-McNeal AP, Clarkson PM, Ebbeling

C. Lower extremity alignment and injury in young,

preprofessional, college and professional ballet dancers: part

I. Turnout and knee-foot alignment. Med Probl Perform Art.

;4(4):148-53.

von Elm E, Altman D, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC,

Vanderbroucke JP, et al. Strengthening the Reporting of

Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement:

guidelines for reporting observational studies. BMJ.

;335(7624):806-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.008

Fortin M, Stewart M, Poitras M-E, Almirall J, Maddocks H. A

systematic review of prevalence studies on multimorbidity:

toward a more uniform methodology. Ann Fam Med.

;10(2):142-51. doi: 10.1370/afm.1337

Published

2017-12-12

Issue

Section

Revisão Sistemática

How to Cite

Methods used to evaluate the en dehors or turnout of dancers and classical ballet dancers: a literature review. (2017). Fisioterapia E Pesquisa, 24(4), 444-452. https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-2950/17100124042017