Performative sensibility and the communication of things

Keywords: Performative sensibility, Communication of things, Fitbit, Actor-Network Theory


This article affirms the social character of objects and highlights the differences between sociotechnical networks of everyday objects and those of digitally-augmented objects, which characterize the Internet of Things (IoT). This difference between automation processes and IoT networks is called performative sensibility (PS). We also show that PS is not a technical characteristic of sensors and actuators but a property that places the digitally-augmented object in a broader communication network through algorithmic performances and procedures. We explore how PS can be seen as a fundamental key to a conceptual model of the communication of things, including the procedural narratives of Fibit Charge HR2.


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

André Luiz Martins Lemos, Universidade Federal da Bahia

Full Professor, Federal University of Bahia (UFBA), Senior Researcher (PQ-1A) at the National Scientific Council (CNPq/MCT-Brazil). Coordinator of Lab404. Digital Media, Networks and Space Research Laboratory (POSCOM/UFBA)

Elias Cunha Bitencourt, Universidade do Estado da Bahia

Assistant Professor in the Department of Design, State University of Bahia, PhD candidate on the Communication and Contemporary Cultures Program at the Federal University of Bahia (UFBA). Researcher at Lab404. Digital Media, Networks and Space Research Laboratory (POSCOM/UFBA) and at Virtual Community – Game and education research group (UNEB)


ASHTON, K. That “internet of things” thing: in the real world, things matter more than ideas. RFID Journal, Hauppauge, 22 jun. 2009. Disponível em: <>. Acesso em: 9 out. 2018.

ATZORI, L.; IERA, A.; MORABITO, G. The internet of things: a survey. Computer Networks, Amsterdã, v. 54, n. 15, p. 2787-2805, 2010. DOI:

AUSTIN, J. L. How to do things with words: the William James lectures delivered at Harvard University in 1955. Oxford: Clarendon, 1962.

BALL, K.; DI DOMENICO, M.; NUNAN, D. Big data surveillance and the body-subject. Body & Society, Thousand Oaks, v. 22, n. 2, p. 58-81, 2016. DOI:

BENNETT, J. Vibrant matter: a political ecology of things. Durham: Duke University Press, 2010.

BOGOST, I. Persuasive games: the expressive power of videogames. Cambridge, MA; London: The MIT Press, 2007.

BOGOST, I. Unit operations: an approach to videogame criticism. Cambridge, MA; Londres: The MIT Press, 2008.

CALZADA, I.; COBO, C. Unplugging: deconstructing the smart city. Journal of Urban Technology, Abingdon, v. 22, n. 1, p. 23-43, 2015. DOI:

CETINA, K. K. Sociality with objects: social relations in postsocial knowledge societies. Theory, Culture and Society, Thousand Oaks, v. 14, n. 4, p. 1-30, 1997. DOI:

CIPRIANI, J. Fitbit beats back competition with wellness program. Fortune, New York, 20 out. 2015. Disponível em: <>. Acesso em: 11 fev. 2017.

CLUSTER OF EUROPEAN RESEARCH PROJECTS. IoT: Internet of Things: strategic research roadmap. Bruxelas: European Commission, 2009.

DANAHER, J. The threat of algocracy: reality, resistance and accommodation. Philosophy & Technology, Amsterdam, v. 29, n. 3, p. 245-269, 2016. DOI:

DELEUZE, G.; GUATTARI, F. Mil platôs: capitalismo e esquizofrenia. São Paulo: Editora 34, 1995. v. 1.

DOURISH, P. The internet of urban things. In: KITCHIN, R.; PERNG, S.-Y. (Ed.). Code and the city. London; New York: Routledge, 2016. p. 27-48.

ENGESTRÖM, J. Social objects: what beach balls and potatoes can teach us about social networks. SlideShare, Sunnyvale, 3 maio 2008. Disponível em: <>. Acesso em: 1º jul. 2013.

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION. Ingestibles, wearables and embeddables. Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC, 30 jan. 2015. Disponível em: <>. Acesso em: 9 fev. 2017.

FINNEMANN, N. O. Digitization: new trajectories of mediatization? In: LUNDBY, K. (Ed.). Mediatization of communication. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2014. p. 297-322.

FITBIT. Fitbit announces Adam Pellegrini as vice president of digital health. Business Wire, San Francisco, 1º ago. 2016a. Disponível em: <>. Acesso em: 1 jan. 2016.

FITBIT. Fitbit introduces “Fitbit Group Health” for corporate wellness, weight management programs, insurers and clinical research. Business Wire, São Francisco, 10 out. 2016b. Disponível em: <>. Acesso em: 1º jan. 2016.

FITBIT. Form 10-K: for the fiscal year ended December 31. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, DC, 29 fev. 2016c. Disponível em: <>. Acesso em: 9 out. 2018.

FOTOPOULOU, A.; O’RIORDAN, K. Training to self-care: fitness tracking, biopedagogy and the healthy consumer. Health Sociology Review, Abingdon, v. 26, n. 1, p. 54-68, 2017. DOI:

FOUCAULT. M. Dits et écrits : 1954-1988. Paris: Gallimard, 1994.

FUCHS, C. et al. Internet and surveillance: the challenges of web 2.0 and social media. Florence, KY: Taylor & Francis, 2013.

GIUSTO, D. et al. (Ed.). The internet of things: 20th Tyrrhenian Workshop on Digital Communication. New York: Springer, 2010.

GREENFIELD, A. Everyware: the dawning age of ubiquitous computing. Berkeley: New Riders, 2006.

GREENGARD, S. The internet of things. Cambridge, MA; London: The MIT Press, 2015.

HARMAN, G. The quadruple object. Winchester; Washington, DC: Zero Books, 2011.

HOWARD, P. N. Pax technica: how the internet of things may set us free or lock us up. New Haven, CN; London: Yale University Press, 2015.

INTERNATIONAL DATA CORPORATION. Worldwide quarterly wearable device tracker report 2016. Framingham: IDC, 2016. Disponível em: <>. Acesso em: 14 jan. 2017.

INTERNATIONAL DATA CORPORATION. Worldwide quarterly wearable device tracker report 2017. Framingham: IDC, 2017. Disponível em: <>. Acesso em: 14 ago. 2017.

KARIMOVA, G. Z.; SHIRKHANBEIK, A. Society of things: an alternative vision of internet of things. Cogent Social Sciences, London, v. 1, n. 1, p. 1115654, 2015. DOI:

KENNEDY, H.; POELL, T.; VAN DIJCK, J. Data and agency. Big Data & Society, Thousand Oaks, n. 2015, p. 1-7, 2015. DOI:

KITCHIN, R. Big data, new epistemologies and paradigm shifts. Big Data & Society, Thousand Oaks, n. 2014, p. 1-12, 2014. DOI:

KITCHIN, R. Reframing, reimaging and remaking smart cities. In: CREATING SMART CITIES: PROGRAMMABLE CITY PROJECT WORKSHOP, 2016, Maynooth. Proceedings… Maynooth: Maynooth University, 2016. p. 1-16.

KLAUSER, F. R.; ALBRECHTSLUND, A. From self-tracking to smart urban infrastructures: towards an interdisciplinary research agenda on big data. Surveillance & Society, Chapel Hill, v. 12, n. 2, p. 273-286, 2014. DOI:

KRASNOGOR, N.; GUSTAFSON, S. Toward truly “memetic” memetic algo¬rithms: discussion and proofs of concept. In: ADVANCES IN NATURE-INSPIRED COMPUTATION: THE PARALLEL PROBLEM SOLVING FROM NATURE WORKSHOPS, 7., 2002, Reading. Proceedings… Reading: University of Reading, 2002. p. 1-21.

LASSWELL, H. D. The structure and function of communication in society. The communication of ideas, New York, v. 37, p. 215-228, 1948.

LATOUR, B. Reassembling the social: an introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.

LATOUR, B. Uma sociologia sem objeto? observações sobre a interobjetividade. Valise, Porto Alegre, v. 5, n. 10, p. 165-187, 2015.

LEDGER, D.; MCCAFFREY, D. Inside wearables: how the science of human behavior change offers the secret to long-term engagement. Medium, Cambridge, MA, 31 jan. 2014. Disponível em: <>. Acesso em: 8 nov. 2018.

LEMKE, T. New materialisms: Foucault and the government of things. Theory, Culture & Society, Thousand Oaks, v. 32, n. 4, p. 3-25, 2015. DOI:

LEMOS, A. A comunicação das coisas: teoria ator-rede e cibercultura. São Paulo: Annablume, 2013.

LEMOS, A. Sensibilités performatives : les nouvelles sensibilités des objets dans les métropoles contemporaines. Sociétés, De Boeck, v. 132, n. 2, p. 75-87, 2016. DOI:

LEMOS, A.; BITENCOURT, E. I feel my wrist buzz: Smartbody and performa¬tive sensibility in Fitbit devices. Galáxia, São Paulo, n. 36, p. 5-17, 2017. DOI:

LEWIS, Z. H. et al. Using an electronic activity monitor system as an intervention modality: a systematic review. BMC Public Health, London, n. 15, p. 585, 2015. DOI:

LUNDBY, K. Mediatization of communication. In: ______. (Ed.). Mediatization of communication. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2014. p. 3-38.

LUPTON, D. Self-tracking cultures: towards a sociology of personal informatics. In: AUSTRALIAN COMPUTER-HUMAN INTERACTION CONFERENCE ON DESIGNING FUTURES: THE FUTURE OF DESIGN, 26., 2014, Sydney. Proceedings… New York: ACM, 2014. p. 77-86. DOI:

LUPTON, D. Personal data practices in the age of lively data. In: DANIELS, J.; GREGORY, K.; COTTOM, T. M. (Ed.). Digital sociologies. Cambridge, UK: Polity, 2015. p. 3-16.

LUPTON, D. The quantified self: a sociology of self-tracking. Malden: Polity, 2016.

LYONS, E. J. et al. Behavior change techniques implemented in electronic lifestyle activity monitors: a systematic content analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, Toronto, v. 16, n. 8, p. e192, 2014. DOI:

MANOVICH, L. Software takes command: international texts in critical media aesthetics. New York; London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2013.

MARTIN, R. The internet of things (IoT): removing the human element. Infosec Writers, Chicago, 28 dez. 2015. Disponível em: <>. Acesso em: 5 maio 2016.

MAYER-SCHÖNBERGER, V.; CUKIER, K. Big data: a revolution that will transform how we live, work, and think. Boston; New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2013.

MERCER, K. et al. Behavior change techniques present in wearable activity trackers: a critical analysis. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, Toronto, v. 4, n. 2, p. e40, 2016. DOI:

MITEW, T. Do objects dream of an internet of things? The Fibreculture Journal, Londres, v. 23, n. 2014, p. 3-26, 2014.

MULANI, T. T.; PINGLE, S. V. Internet of things. International Research Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, Pune, v. 2, n. 3, p. 1-4, 2016. Suplemento.

NANSEN, B. et al. An internet of social things. In: AUSTRALIAN COMPUTER-HUMAN INTERACTION CONFERENCE ON DESIGNING FUTURES: THE FUTURE OF DESIGN, 26., 2014, Sydney. Proceedings… New York: ACM: ACM, 2014. p. 87-96. DOI:

NASCIMENTO, L. C.; BRUNO, F. Quantified selves: contar, monitorar e conhecer a si mesmo através dos números. In: ENCONTRO DA ASSOCIAÇÃO NACIONAL DOS PROGRAMAS DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM COMUNICAÇÃO, 22., 2013, Salvador. Anais… Salvador: Compós, 2013. p. 1-19.

OWEN, T. The violence of algorithms. Foreign Affairs, Congers, 25 maio 2015. Disponível em: <>. Acesso em: 9 out. 2018.

PAI, A. Fitbit revenues top $1.8B in 2015, added 1,000 enterprise customers for corporate wellness. Mobi Health News, Chicago, 23 fev. 2016. Disponível em: <>. Acesso em: 9 out. 2018.

PAPACHARISSI, Z. A networked self: identity, community, and culture on social network sites. London; New York: Routledge, 2010.

PAPATHANASSOPOULOS, S. Privacy 2.0. Social Media + Society, Thousand Oaks, v. 1, n. 1, p. 1-2, 2015. DOI:

PTICEK, M.; PODOBNIK, V.; JEZIC, G. Beyond the internet of things: the social networking of machines. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, Thousand Oaks, n. 2016, p. 8178417, 2016. DOI:

RAIL, G.; JETTE, S. Reflections on biopedagogies and/of public health: on bio-others, rescue missions, and social justice. Cultural Studies: Critical Methodologies, Thousans Oaks, v. 15, n. 5, p. 327-336, 2015. DOI:

ROTHBERG, M. S. Disk drive for receiving setup data in a self monitoring analysis and reporting technology (SMART) command. Google Patents, Mountain View, 2005. Disponível em: <>. Acesso em: 7 nov. 2018.

SHANNON, Claude E.; WEAVER, W. The mathematical theory of communica¬tion. 1949. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1963.

SMITH, G. J. D. Surveillance, data and embodiment: on the work of being watched. Body & Society, Thousand Oaks, v. 22, n. 2, p. 108-139, 2016. DOI:

SMITH, G. J. D.; VONTHETHOFF, B. Health by numbers? exploring the practice and experience of datafied health. Health Sociology Review, Abingdon, v. 26, n. 1, p. 6-21, 2016. DOI:

SOWE, S. K. et al. Managing heterogeneous sensor data on a big data platform: IoT services for data-intensive science. In: INSTITUTE OF ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INTERNATIONAL COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND APPLICATIONS CONFERENCE WORKSHOPS, 38., 2014, Vasteras. Proceedings… New York: IEEE, 2014. p. 295-300. DOI: ht¬tps://

TURKLE, S. Evocative objects: things we think with. Cambridge, MA; London: The MIT Press, 2007.

UCKELMANN, D.; HARRISON, M.; MICHAHELLES, F. (Ed.). Architecting the internet of things. Berlin: Heidelberg; New York: Springer, 2011.

VAN DIJCK, J. Datafication, dataism and dataveillance: big data between scien¬tific paradigm and ideology. Surveillance & Society, Chapel Hill, v. 12, n. 2, p. 197-208, 2014. DOI:

VAN KRANENBURG, R. The internet of things: a critique ambient technolo¬gy and the all-seeing network of RFID. Amsterdã: Institute of Network Cultures, 2008.

WEARABLE technology: unlocking ROI of workplace wellness contents: an em¬ployer case study in health care cost management. Springbuk, Indianápolis, 3 out. 2016. Disponível em: <>. Acesso em: 9 out. 2018.

WINNER, L. Do artifacts have politics? Daedalus, Cambridge, MA, v. 109, n. 1, p. 121-136, inverno 1980.

WRIGHT, J.; HARWOOD, V. Biopolitics and the “obesity epidemic”: governing bodies. London; New York: Routledge, 2012.

ZDRAVKOVIĆ, M. et al. Survey of internet-of-things platforms. In: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION SOCIETY AND TECHNOLOGY, 6., 2016, Kopaonik. Proceedings… New York: ACM, 2016. p. 216-220.

How to Cite
Lemos, A., & Bitencourt, E. (2018). Performative sensibility and the communication of things. MATRIZes, 12(3), 165-188.
Em Pauta/Agenda