The development of the AWIN welfare assessment protocol for donkeys
Keywords:AWIN protocol, Animal-based measure, Donkey welfare, Welfare assessment, Welfare indicator
The donkey population has increased in the last 10 years, with an estimated 50 million donkeys currently worldwide. Donkey welfare, meanwhile, is an increasing global concern that receives close public scrutiny. However, multiple challenges are surrounding how donkey welfare is assessed and recorded. The Animal Welfare Indicators (AWIN) project is the first project, funded by the European Commission, intended to improve donkey welfare by developing a scientifically sound and practical on-farm welfare assessment protocol. The present study describes the procedure for the development of the AWIN welfare assessment protocol for donkeys: 1) selection of promising welfare indicators; 2) research to cover gaps in knowledge; 3) stakeholder consultation; 4) testing the prototype protocol on-farm. The proposed two-level strategy improved on-farm feasibility, while the AWIN donkey app enables the standardized collection of data with prompt results. Although limitations are linked with a relatively small reference population, the AWIN welfare assessment protocol represents the first scientific and standardized approach to evaluate donkey welfare on-farm.
Animal Welfare Indicators - AWIN. welfare assessment protocol for donkeys [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2020 July 14]. Available from: https://air.unimi.it/retrieve/handle/2434/269100/384805/AWINProtocolDonkeys.pdf
Blokhuis HJ, Veissier I, Miele M, Jones B. The Welfare Quality® project and beyond: safeguarding farm animal well-being. Acta Agric Scand Sect A Anim Sci. 2010;60(3):129-40.
Broom DM, Johnson KG. Stress and animal welfare. Cham: Springer Science and Business Media LLC; 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32153-6.
Broom DM. A history of animal welfare science. Acta Biotheor. 2011;59(2):121-37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10441-011-9123-3. PMid:21347723.
Dai F, Dalla Costa E, Battini M, Barbieri S, Ferrari L, Minero M, Mattiello S, Canali E. New frontiers in welfare data collection: AWINGoat and AWINHorse app. In: AWSELVA-ECAWBM-ESVCE Congress; 2015; Bristol. Bristol: University of Bristol; 2015.
Dai F, Dalla Costa E, Cannas S, Heinzl EUL, Minero M, Mazzola SM. May salivary chromogranin a act as a physiological index of stress in transported donkeys? A pilot study. Animals. 2020;10(6):972. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10060972. PMid:32503233.
Dai F, Dalla Costa E, Murray LAM, Canali E, Minero M. Welfare conditions of donkeys in Europe: initial outcomes from on-farm assessment. Animals. 2016;6(1):5. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani6010005. PMid:26761034.
Dai F, Segati G, Brscic M, Chincarini M, Dalla Costa E, Ferrari L, Burden F, Judge A, Minero M. Effects of management practices on the welfare of dairy donkeys and risk factors associated with signs of hoof neglect. J Dairy Res. 2018;85(1):30-8. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022029917000723. PMid:29125086.
Dalla Costa E, Dai F, Lebelt D, Scholz P, Barbieri S, Canali E, Zanella AJ, Minero M. Welfare assessment of horses: the AWIN approach. Anim Welf. 2016;25(4):481-8. https://doi.org/10.7120/09627218.104.22.1681.
Dalla Costa E, Dai F, Murray LAM, Guazzetti S, Canali E, Minero M. A study on validity and reliability of on-farm tests to measure human-animal relationship in horses and donkeys. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2015;163:110-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2014.12.007.
Dalla Costa E, Murray LAM, Dai F, Canali E, Minero M. Equine on-farm welfare assessment: a review of animal-based indicators. Anim Welf. 2014;23(3):323-41. https://doi.org/10.7120/09627222.214.171.1243.
Dalla Costa E, Tranquillo V, Dai F, Minero M, Battini M, Mattiello S, Barbieri S, Ferrante V, Ferrari L, Zanella A, Canali E. Text mining analysis to evaluate stakeholders’ perception regarding welfare of equines, small ruminants, and Turkeys. Animals. 2019;9(5):225. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9050225. PMid:31071978.
DuBois C, DeVries T, Haley DB, Lawlis P, Merkies K. Putting an on-farm welfare assessment tool into practice in the canadian equine industry: a pilot study. J Equine Vet Sci. 2018;63:35-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2017.12.004.
European Food Safety Authority - EFSA. EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare. EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare. Statement on the use of animal-based measures to assess the welfare of animals. EFSA J. 2012;10(6):1-29.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations - FAO. FAOSTAT [Internet]. Rome: FAO; 2018 [cited 2020 Aug 6]. Available from: http://faostat.fao.org
Fraser D. Assessing animal welfare at the farm and group level: a United States perspective. Anim Welf. 2003;12(4):493-503.
Ghulam ML, Muhammad GUS, Muhammad SK, Jamil AG, Dildaar HK, Sumera AK, Farooq A, Abdul MK, Mubashir H, Abdul HD. Management and welfare needs of donkeys in the rural areas of Noushahro Feroze, Pakistan. Sci Res Essays. 2014;9(10):410-3. https://doi.org/10.5897/SRE2013.5363.
Hockenhull J, Whay HR. A review of approaches to assessing equine welfare. Equine Vet Educ. 2014;26(3):159-66. https://doi.org/10.1111/eve.12129.
Kidanmariam G. The use of donkeys for transport in Amhara Region, Ethiopia. In: Starkey P, Fielding D, editors. Donkeys, people and development: a resource book of the Animal Traction Network for Eastern and Southern Africa (ATNESA). Wageningen: ACP-EU Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation (CTA); 2004. p. 244.
McLean AK, Heleski CR, Yokoyama MT, Wang W, Doumbia A, Dembele B. Improving working donkey (Equus asinus) welfare and management in Mali, West Africa. J Vet Behav Clin Appl Res. 2012;7(3):123-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2011.10.004.
Minero M, Dalla Costa E, Dai F, Murray LAM, Canali E, Wemelsfelder F. Use of Qualitative Behaviour Assessment as an indicator of welfare in donkeys. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2016;2016(174):147-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2015.10.010.
Raw Z, Rodrigues JB, Rickards K, Ryding J, Norris SL, Judge A, Kubasiewicz LM, Watson TL, Little H, Hart B, Sullivan R, Garrett C, Burden FA. Equid assessment, research and scoping (EARS): the development and implementation of a new equid welfare assessment and monitoring tool. Animals. 2020;10(2):297. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10020297. PMid:32069910.
Shah SZA, Nawaz Z, Nawaz S, Carder G, Ali M, Soomro N, Compston PC. The role and welfare of cart donkeys used in waste management in Karachi, Pakistan. Animals. 2019;9(4):159. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9040159. PMid:31013717.
Sommerville R, Brown AF, Upjohn M. A standardised equine-based welfare assessment tool used for six years in low and middle income countries. PLoS One. 2018;13(2):e0192354. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192354. PMid:29466391.
The Donkey Sanctuary. Under the skin: update on the global crisis for donkeys and the people who depend on them. Devon: The Donkey Sanctuary; 2019.
Thiemann A, Foxcroft A. Working across Europe to improve donkey welfare. Vet Rec. 2016;179(12):298-300. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.i4112. PMid:27660353.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2021 Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The journal content is authorized under the Creative Commons BY-NC-SA license (summary of the license: https://
Seventh Framework Programme
Grant numbers FP7-KBBE-2010-4