Custos e benefícios sociais da política de auto-suficiência em borracha natural no Brasil
Abstract
In Brazil, the rubber policy to expand production has been based principally on price increase and subsidized credit. Social costs and benefits of this policy have not yet been studied. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate net social costs of the rubber production policy in Brazil considering both wild and planted rubber. The modern theory of welfare economics provides the basic conceptual framework used. The social costs of increased production were calculated using the area below the supply curve with factor prices corrected for differences between market and social prices. Social benefits were
considered equal to the reduction in natural rubber imports evaluated at social exchange rate. The results indicated that social costs of native rubber production is about 23% of the national consumption. For planted rubber production, social costs are 31,5%. Among the various alternatives studied, there are situations where social costs rise
to 100%. According to the regional disaggregation
used, the wild rubber production in Amazonia showed the lowest social costs and planted rubber production in the Amazon Region has lower social costs than other production areas of the country. One main conclusion of the study is that even though expanding cultivation of natural rubber to non-traditional areas may be justified on the basis of private production costs, the increased rubber production will be obtained at higher costs for the society as a whole.
Downloads
References
ANUÁRIO ESTATíSTICO DO BRASIL. Rio de Janeiro, v. 43, 1982.
BANCO CENTRAL DO BRASIL. Boletim Mensal. Brasília, WCIj/ian. 1983.
CARVALHO, L. A. C. História pouco conhecida da borracha natural brasileira. Elâstomeros, São Paulo, 5(3): 6-11, 1979.
CONJUNTURA ECONÔMICA. Rio de Janeiro, 25 (11), 1972.
CONTADOR, C. R. Trigo nacional: o custo social da auto-suficiência. Estudos Econômicos, São Paulo, 4(3): 53-84, 1974.,
CONTADOR, C. R. Benefícios e custos sociais da política de garantia agrícola no Brasil. In: VEIGA, Alberto. Ensaios sobre política agrícola brasileira. São Paulo, IPE/USP, 1979, p.163-206.
CONTADOR, C. R. Avaliacão social de projetos. São Paulo, Atlas, 1981. 301 p. GUITTON, S. H. Aspectos econômicos e
políticos da produção de borracha. Elastomeros, São Paulo. 2(3): 4-11, 1976.
HARBERGER, A. C.' Three basic postulates for applied welfare economics: an interpretative essay. Journal of Economic Literature, Pennsylvania, 2(3)785-97, 1971.
JOHNSON, H. G. The costs of protection and self sufficiency. Quaterly Journal of Economics, Cambridge, 75(3) ; 356-72, 1965.
MAMED, F A. Custos e benefícios sociais da política de auto-suficiência em borracha natural no Brasil. Viçosa, UFV. Imprensa Universitária, 1984, 90 p. (Tese M.S.).
MELO, F H. & PELIN, E. R. As soluções energéticas e a economia brasileira. São Paulo, HUCITEC, 1984. 146 p.
MENEZES, J. A. S. & VASCONCELLOS FILHO, A. P. Borracha vegetal: perspectivas de mercado e algumas considerações
econômicas, biológicas e políticas. Itabuna, CEPLAC, 1977. 31 p. (Boletim Técnico, 54).
MESQUITA, A. et all. Diagnóstico e sugestões para a auto-suficiência do setor de borracha. Boletim Econômico, Rio de Janeiro, 516:7-22, 1976.
OLIVEIRA, F. T. G. Custos e retornos sociais de políticas de preço de leite. Viçosa, UFV, Imprensa Universitária, 1976. 53 p.
RIBEIRO, M. J. T. Incentivos fiscais e bem-estar social: análise do reflorestamento com cajueiro no Nordeste. Viçosa, UFV. Imprensa Universitária, 1980. 76 p.
SUDHEVEA. Plano nacional da borracha.Brasília, 1971. 147 p. (Anexo II).
SUDHEVEA. Relatório de atividades/1976. Brasília, 1976. 27 p.
SUDHEVEA. Relatório de atividades/1977. Brasília, 1977 58 p.
SUDHEVEA. Relatório de atividades/1982. Brasília, 1982. 79p.
SUDHEVEA. Custo de produção de borracha natural em seringais nativos. Brasília, 1983. 43 p.
SUDHEVEA. Custo de produção de borracha natural em seringais cultivados. Brasília, 1983a. 85 p.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 1986 Estudos Econômicos (São Paulo)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
By submitting an article, the author authorizes its publication and attests that it has not been submitted to any other journal. The original article is considered final. Articles selected for publication are proofread for grammatical and orthographic errors. The journal does not pay rights for published articles. The Institute of Economic Research from the School of Economics, Business and Accounting of the University of São Paulo (Instituto de Pesquisas Econômicas da Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade da Universidade de São Paulo) owns the journal's copyright.