Institutions and economic behaviour under uncertainty

Authors

  • David Dequech Universidade Estadual de Campinas Author

Keywords:

institutions, economic behaviour, uncertainty, knowledge, levels of consciousness

Abstract

This paper intents do link some contributions to our understanding of institutions with a
discussion of economic behaviour under uncertainty, elaborating the characterization of
social reality as subject to unpredictable structural changes. Adopting a broad definition
of institutions, including conventions, it discusses three basic ways in which institutions
influence economic behaviour: their restrictive function, their cognitive function and their
influence on ends. The paper then rejects a reductionist approach to the relation between
institutions and individuals. In order to better understand the influence of institutions on
behaviour, and particularly on knowledge, the paper also distinguishes between different
levels of consciousness and, as a result, different types of knowledge. Finally, the paper
establishes a connection between the preceding discussion and the analysis of the
determinants of the state of expectation, considering Hodgson's proposal for an
institutionalist approach to expectations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ADAMS, J. Economy as instituted process: change, transformation, and ptopizss. Journal ofEconomic Issues, v. 28, n. 2, p. 331-55, June 1994.

ARESTIS, P. The Rost-Keynesian approach to economics. Aldershot: Elgar, 1992.

BINMORE, K. Modeling rational players I. Economics and Philosophy, v. 3, n. 2, p. 179-214, October 1987.

BINMORE, K. De-Bayesing game theory. In: BINMORE, K., KIRMAN, A. & TANI, P. (eds.), Frontiers ofgame theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1993.

BOETTKE, P. Individuals and institutions. In: PRYCHITKO, D. (ed.), Individuals, institutions, interpretations. Aldershot: Avebury, 1995.

BOURDIEU, P. Men and machines. In: KNORR-CETINA, K. & CICOUREL, A. (eds.).Advances in social theory and methodology: toward an integration of micro- and macro- sociologies. London: Roudedge and Kegan Paul, 1981.

BROMLEY, D. Economic interests and institutions. Oxford: Blackwell, 1989.

BUTOS, W & KOPPL, R. The varieties of subjectivism: Keynes and Hayek on expectations. History of Political Economy^ v. 29, n. 2, p. 327-59, Summer 1997.

CARVALHO, E On the concept oftime in Shacklean and Sraffian economics. Journal ofPost Keynesian Economics, v. 6, n. 2, p. 265-80, Winter 1983-84.

CODDINGTON, A. Deficient foresight: a troublesome theme in Keynesian economics.American Economic Review, v. 72, n. 3, p. 480-87, June 1982.

DAVIDSON, P. Money and the real world. 2nd edition. London: Macmillan, 1978.

DAVIDSON, P. Shackle and Keynes vs. rational expectations theory and the role of time, liquidity and financial markets. In: FROWEN, S. (ed.), Unknowledge and choice in economics. London: Macmillan, 1990.

DAVIDSON, P. Austrians and Post Keynesians on economic reality: rejoinder to the critics. Critical Review, v. 7, n. 2-3, p. 423-44, 1993.

DAVIDSON, P. Reality and economic theory. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, v. 18, n. 4, p. 470-508, Summer 1996.

DENZAU, A. & NORTH, D. Shared mental models: ideologies and institutions. Kyklos, v. 47, n. 1, p. 3-31, 1994.

DEQUECH, D. Uncertainty in a strong sense: meaning and sonrces.Economic Issues, v. 2, n. 2, p. 21-43, September 1997.

DEQUECH, D. Expectations and confidence under uncertainty. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, v. 21, n. 3, p. 415-30, Spring 1999a.

DEQUECH, D. Fundamental uncertainty and ambiguity. Mimeo, University of Campinas, 1999b.

DEQUECH, D. On some arguments for the rationality of conventional behaviour under uncertainty: concepts, applicability and criticisms. In: KRIESLER, P. & SARDONI, C. (eds.), Keynes, Post-Keynesianism and political economy. London: Routiedge, 1999c.

DOSI, G. Institutions and markets in a dynamic world. The Manchester School, v. 56, n. 2, p. 119-46, June 1988.

DOW, A. & DOW, S. Animal spirits and rationality. In: LAWSON, T. & PESARAN, H. (eds.), 1985.

DOW, J. & WERLANG, S. Nash equilibrium under Knightian uncertainty: breaking down backward induction. Journal of Economic Theory, 64, 1994.

DOW, S. Alacroeconomic thought - a methodological approach. Oxford:

Blackwell, 1985.

DOW, S. Post Keynesian economics: conceptual underpinnings. British Review ofEconomic Issues, v. 10, n. 23, p. 1-18, Autumn 1988.

DOW, S. Beyond dualism. Cambridge Journal of Economics, v. 14, n. 2, p. 143-57, June 1990.

DOW, S. Keynes's epistemology and economic methodology. In: O'DONNELL, R. (ed.), Keynes as philosopher-economist. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1991.

DOW, S. & HILLARD, J. (eds.) Keynes, knowledge and uncertainty. Aldershot: Elgar, 1995.

ELSTER, J. Social norms and economic theory. Journal of Economic Perspectives, v. 3, n. 4, p. 99-117, Summer 1989.

FAVEREAU, O. Probability and uncertainty: "after all, Keynes was right". Economies et Societes, serie PE, 10, p. 133-67, 1998a.

FAVEREAU, O. La "Theorie Generale": de I'economie conventionnelle a Peconomie

des conventions. Cahiersd'EconomiePolitique, 14-15, p. 197-220,1988b.

FAVEREAU, O. Marches internes, marches externes. Revue Economique, v. 40, n. 2, p. 273-328, 1989.

FUSFELD, D. Toward a revision of the economic theory of individual hehzviot. Journal ofEconomic Issues, v. 23, n. 2, p. 357-66, June 1989.

GIDDENS, A. Central problems in social theory. London: Macmillan, 1979.

GIDDENS, A. The constitution ofsociety. Cambridge: Polity, 1984.

GORDON, W & ADAMS, J. Economics as social science: an evolutionary approach. Riverdale, MD: Riverdale, 1989.

GRANOVETTER, M. Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. AmericanJournal of Sociology, v. 91, n. 3, November 1985.

GRUCHY, A. Contemporary economic thought - the contribution of neoinstitutional

economics. Clifton, USA: Kelley', 1972.

GRUCHY, A. The reconstruction of economics. New York: Greenwood, 1987.

HICKS, J. Economic perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977.

HODGSON, G. Persuasion, expectations and the limits to Keynes. In: LAWSON, T. & PESARAN, H. (eds.), 1985.

HODGSON, G. Economics and institutions. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

HODGSON, G. Post-Keynesianism and institutionalism: the missing link. In: PHEBY, J. (ed.), New directions in Post-Keynesian economics. Aldershot: Elgar, 1989. Reprinted in HODGSON, G. After Marx and Srajfa. Basingtoke: Macmillan, 1991.

HODGSON, G. Institutional economic theory: the old versus the new. Review of Political Economy, v. 1, n. 3, p. 246-69, November 1989b.

HODGSON, G. Economics and evolution. Cambridge: Polity, 1993a.

HODGSON, G. Commentary. In: TOOL, M. (ed.), Institutional economics: theory, method, policy. Boston; Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1993b.

HODGSON, G. Comment on Pasinetti. In: DELORME, R. & DOPFER, K. (eds.), The political economy ofdiversity. Aldershot: Elgar, 1994.

ISAAC, A. Morality, maximization and economic behavior. Southern Economic Journal, v. 63, n. 3, p. 559-70, January 1997.

JENSEN, H. The theory of human nature. Journal ofEconomic Issues, v. 21, n. 3, p. 1039-73, September 1987. Reprinted in TOOL, M. (ed.), 1988.

KAPP, K. In defense of institutional economics. SwedishJournal ofEconomics, 70, p. 1-18, 1968. Reprinted in SAMUELS, W (ed.), Institutional economics, Vol. I. Aldershot: Elgar, 1988.

KEYNES, J. M. Thegeneral theory ofemployment, interest and money. London: Macmillan, 1936. 1964 edition, Harvest/HBJ.

KEYNES, J. M. The general theory of employment. QuarterlyJournal ofEconomics, 51, p. 209-23, February 1937. Reprinted in KEYNES, J. M. The collected writings ofJohn Maynard Keynes, vol. XIV London: Macmillan, 1973.

KHALIL, E. Organizations versus institutions. Journal ofInstitutional and Theoretical Economics, v. 151, n. 3, p. 445-66, 1995.

KNIGHT, E Risk, uncertainty and profit. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1921.

KNIGHT, J. Social institutions and human cognition.ofInstitutional and Theoretical Economics, v. 153, n. 4, p. 693-99, December 1997.

LANGLOIS, R. Knowledge and rationality in the Austrian school: an analytical survey. Eastern Economic Journal, v. 9, n. 4, p. 309-330, October-December 1985.

LANGLOIS, R. The new institutional economics; an introductory essay. In:

LANGLOIS, R. {ed.). Economics as aprocess: essays in the new institutional economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.

LANGLOIS, R. {ed.). What is wrong with the old institutional economics (and what is

still wrong with the new)? Review of Political Economy, v. 1, n. 3, p. 270-98, November 1989.

LAWSON, T. Uncertainty and economic analysis. Economic Journal, 95, p. 909-27, December 1985.

LAWSON, T. The relative/absolute nature of knowledge and economic analysis. Economic Journal, 97, p. 951-70, December 1987.

LAWSON, T. Economics and expectations. In: DOW, S. & HILLARD, J. (eds.), 1995.

Economics and reality. London: Roudedge, 1997.

LAWSON, T. & PESARAN, H. (eds.) Keynes) economics - methodological issues. Armonk, NY: Sharpe, 1985.

LECQ, E van der. Conventions and institutions in coordination problems. De Economist, v. 144, n. 3, p. 397-428, October 1996.

LEIBENSTEIN, H. On the economics of conventions and institutions: an exploratory essay. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, v. 40, n. 1, p. 74-86, 1984.

LEWIS, D. Convention: a philosophical study. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1969.

LO, K. Equilibrium in beliefs under uncertainty. Journal ofEconomic Theory, 1996.

MAKI, U. Economics with institutions: agenda for methodological inquiry. In: MAKI, U., GUSTAFSSON, B. & KNUDSEN, C. (eds.), 1993.

MAKI, U., GUSTAFSSON, B. & KNUDSEN, C. (eds.) Rationality, institutions and economic methodology. New York: Routiedge, 1993.

MAYHEW, A. Culture: core concept under attack. Journal ofEconomic Issues, v. 21, n. 3, p. 587-603, June 1987.

MAYHEW, A. Contrasting origins of the two institutionalisms; the social science

context. Review of Political Economy, v. 1, n. 3, p. 319-33, November 1989.

McKENNA, E. & ZANNONI, D. Philosophical foundations of Post Keynesian economics. Journal ofPost Keynesian Economics, v. 15, n. 3, p. 395-407, Spring 1993.

MEEKS, J. G. Keynes on the rationality of decision procedures under uncertainty: the investment decision. In: MEEKS, J. G. (ed.),

Thoughtful economic man. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.

MILLER. E. Institutional economics: philosophy, methodology and theory. The Social Science Journal, v. 15, n. 1, p. 13-25, January 1978.

MIROWSKI, P. Institutions as a solution concept in a game theory context. In: MIROWSKI, P. (ed.). The reconstruction ofeconomic theory. Boston; Kluwer, 1986.

NEALE, W Institutions. Journal of Economic Issues, v. 21, n. 3, p. 1177-

, September 1987. Reprinted in TOOL, M. (ed.), 1988.

NELSON, R. & WINTER, S. An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982.

NEWMAN, G. An institutional perspective on information. International Social Science Journal, v. 28, n. 3, p. 466-92, 1976.

NORTH, D. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.

PETERSON, W. Income, employment, and economic growth. New York: Norton, 1984.

ROTHEIM, R. Organicism and the role ofthe individual in Keynes's thought. Journal ofPost Keynesian Economics, v. 12, n. 2, p. 316-26, 1989-90.

ROTHEIM, R. Keynes on uncertainty and individual behaviour within a theory of effective demand. In: DOW, S. & HILLARD, J. (eds.), 1995.

RUTHERFORD, M. Some issues in the comparison of Austrian and institutional economics. Research in the History ofEconomic Thought and Methodology, 6, p. 159-72, 1989a.

RUTHERFORD, M. What is wrong with the new institutional economics (and what is

still wrong with the old)? Review ofPolitical Economy, v. 1, n. 3, p. 299-318, 1989b.

RUTHERFORD, M. Institutions in economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.

SAMUELS, W The old versus the new institutionalism. Review ofPolitical Economy, v. 2, n. 1, p. 83-86, 1990a.

RUTHERFORD, M. Institutional economics and the theory of cognition. Cambridge Journal ofEconomics, v. 14, n. 2, p. 219-27, June 1990b.

SCHOTTER, A. The economic theory of social institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.

SCREPANTI, E. Relative rationality, institutions and precautionary behaviour. In: GROENEWEGEN, J., PITELIS, C. & SJOSTRAND, S. (eds.), On economic institutions. Aldershot: Elgar, 1995.

SHACKLE, G. Epistemics and economics. Cambridge; Cambridge University Press, 1972.

STREIT, M., MUMMERT, U. & KIWIT, D. Views and comments on cognition, rationality, and institutions. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 153, 1997.

TOOL, M. (ed.), Evolutionary economics - Volume I: Foundations ofinstitutional thought. Armonk, NY: Sharpe, 1988.

VANBERG, V. Rational choice, rule-following and institutions; an evolutionary perspective. In: MAKI, U., GUSTAFSSON, B. 8c KNUDSEN, C. (eds.), 1993.

YOUNG, H. P. The economics ofconvention.Journal ofEconomic Perspectives, v. 10, n. 2, p. 105-22, Spring 1996.

Published

01-12-1999

Issue

Section

Não definida

How to Cite

Dequech, D. (1999). Institutions and economic behaviour under uncertainty. Estudos Econômicos (São Paulo), 29(4), 551-573. https://www.revistas.usp.br/ee/article/view/161519