Teleology and Biology: a defense of teleological thinking in biology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2178-6224v15i1p61-78Palabras clave:
Adaptation, Evolutionary biology, Philosophy of science, TeleologyResumen
Teleological language refers to a forward-looking discourse, and various biologists are troubled with this issue. In this paper, I will discuss the misunderstandings that both philosophers of science and biologists have made against teleology. Among these misunderstandings, I can mention its relationship to anthropomorphism (i.e., a planning agent external to the world reference) and reference to a force immanent to the organisms (“vitalism”) beyond the reach of empirical investigation. I will argue that they are misconceptions and that teleology has shifted its meaning and focus from its pre-evolutionary form. Now it is in the position that it can be used and maintained without violating the principles of modern science. Using an example of the adaptation and function debate, I will discuss how the teleological language is the best interpretation of these issues.
Referencias
AMUNDSON, Ron. Historical development of the concept of adaptation. Adaptation. Pp. 11-53, in: ROSE, Michael R.; LAUDER, George V. (eds.): Adaptation. San Diego: Academic Press, 1996.
AYALA, Francisco José. Evolution, explanation, ethics and aesthetics: towards a philosophy of biology. London: Academic Press, Elsevier, 2016.
BRANDON, Robert N. Adaptation and environment. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990.
CUMMINS, Robert. Neo-teleology. Pp. 157-172, in: ARIEW, Andrew; CUMMINS, Robert; PERLMAN, Mark (eds.): Functions: New Essays in the philosophy of psychology and biology. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002.
DARWIN, Charles Robert. On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. London: Murray, 1859.
DENNETT, Daniel Clement. Darwin’s dangerous idea: evolution and the meanings of life. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1995.
DIFRISCO, James. Functional explanation and the problem of functional equivalence. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 65: 1-8, 2017.
FUTUYMA, Douglas J. Evolution. Sunderland: Sinauer, 2005.
GANS, Carl. Adaptation and the form-function relation. American Zoologist, 28: 681-697, 1988.
GARDNER, Andy. Adaptation as organism design. Biology Letters, 5: 861-864, 2009.
GARSON, Justin. What biological functions are and why they matter. Cambridge: CUP, 2019.
GHISELIN, Michael T. Darwin’s language may seem teleological, but his thinking is another matter. Biology and Philosophy, 9: 489-492, 1994.
GHISELIN. Michael T. Metaphysics and the Origin of Species. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1997.
GOULD, Stephen Jay. The structure of evolutionary theory. Cambridge: Harvard Press, 2002.
GOULD, Stephen Jay.; LEWONTIN, Richard C. The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B, 205: 581-98, 1979.
GOULD, Stephen Jay.; VRBA, Elisabeth S. Exaptation-a missing term in the science of form. Paleobiology, 8: 4-15, 1982.
GRANDCOLAS, Philippe. Adaptation. Pp.77-93, in: HEAMS, Thomas.; HUNEMAN, Philippe.; LECOINTRE, Guillaume.; SILBERSTEIN. Marc. (eds.): Handbook of Evolutionary Thinking in the Sciences. Berlim: Springer, 2015.
GRIFFITHS, Paul E. The historical turn in the study of adaptation. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 47: 511-532, 1996.
HEADS, Michael. Darwin’s Changing views on evolution: from centres of origin and teleology to vicariance and incomplete lineage sorting. Journal of Biogeography, 36 (6): 1018-1026, 2009.
HEMPEL, Carl Gustav. Aspects of scientific explanation and other essays in the philosophy of science. New York: Free Press, 1965.
LENNOX, James G. Teleology. Pp.324-33, in: KELLER, Evelyn Fox.; LLOYD, Elisabeth. A. (eds.): Keywords in evolutionary biology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1992.
LENNOX, James G. Darwin was a teleologist. Biology and philosophy, 8: 409-21, 1993.
LENNOX, James G. Darwin and teleology. Pp.152-157, in: RUSE, Michael. (Ed.): The Cambridge encyclopedia of Darwin and evolutionary thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
LLOYD, Elisabeth. A. Adaptationism and the logic of research questions: how to think clearly about evolutionary causes. Biological Theory, 10: 343-62, 2015.
MACH, Ernst. The scientific conception of the world. The Vienna Circle [1929]. Pp.321-340, in SARKAR, Sahotra (ed.). The emergence of logical empiricism: from 1900 to the Vienna Circle. New York : Garland Publishing, 1996.
MAYR, Ernst. The growth of biological thought: diversity, evolution, and inheritance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982.
MAYR, Ernst. How to carry out the adaptationist program?. American Naturalist, 121: 324-334, 1983.
MAYR, Ernst. The idea of teleology. Journal of the History of Ideas, 53: 117-135, 1992.
MAYR, Ernst; Provine, Will B. The evolutionary synthesis: perspectives on the unification of biology. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1980.
MORRIS, Suzanne C.; TAPLIN, John E. & GELMAN, Susan A. Vitalism in naive biological thinking. Developmental Psychology, 36: 582-595, 2000.
NAGEL, Ernest. The structure of science. New York: Harcourt. 1961.
NEANDER, Karen. The teleological notion of ‘Function’. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 69: 454-468, 1991.
PIGLIUCCI, Massimo.; KAPLAN, Jonathan. The fall and rise of Dr. Pangloss: adaptationism and the Spandrels paper 20 years later. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 15: 66-70, 2000.
PIGLIUCCI, Massimo.; MULLER, Gerd. Evolution, the extended synthesis. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2010.
ROSE, Michael R.; LAUDER, George V. Post-Spandrel adaptationism. Pp.1-8, in: ROSE, Michael R.; LAUDER, George V. (eds.): Adaptation. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 1996.
RUSE, Michael. Teleology in biology: is it a cause for concern?. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 4: 51-54, 1989.
SALMON, Wesley. Charles. Four decades of scientific explanation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1989.
SALMON, Wesley Charles. Scientific Explanation. Pp.7-41, in: SALMON, Merrilee H.; EARMAN, John; GLYMOUR, Clark ; LENNOX, James G.; MACHAMER, Peter; MCGUIRE, J.E.; NORTON, John D.; SALMON, Wesley C.; SCHAFFNER, Kenneth F. (eds.). Introduction to the Philosophy of Science. Nova Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1992.
SHORT, Thomas L. Darwin’s Concept of final cause: neither new nor trivial. Biology and Philosophy, 17(3): 323-40, 2002.
SMITH, Richard J. Explanations for adaptations, just-so stories, and limitations on evidence in evolutionary biology. Evolutionary Anthropology, 25: 276-287, 2016.
STERENLY, Kim. Explanatory pluralism in evolutionary biology. Biology and Philosophy, 11: 193-214, 1996.
STERENLY, Kim.; GRIFFITHS, Paul G. Sex and death: An introduction to philosophy of biology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999.
STODDARD, Mary Caswell ; YONG, Ee Hou; AKKAYNAK, Derya; SHEARD, Catherine; TOBIAS, Joseph A.; MAHADEVAN, L. Avian egg shape: Form, function, and evolution. Science, 356 (6344): 1249-1254, 2017.
WEST-EBERHARD, Mary Jane. Developmental plasticity and evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
WILLIAMS, George Christopher. Natural selection domains, levels, and challenges. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992.
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2020 Filosofia e História da Biologia
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Os manuscritos publicados passam a ser propriedade da revista Filosofia e História da Biologia, e os autores aceitam os termos desta licença e concordam em ceder os direitos autorais para a publicação, além de concordarem com o compromisso da publicação em oferecer acesso aberto a todo o seu conteúdo. As informações e conceitos emitidos em artigos assinados são de absoluta responsabilidade de seus autores.
Datos de los fondos
-
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
Números de la subvención Process number 88882.333078/2019-01)
cademia.edu
