Notes on the Ethics of Candomblé

Authors

  • Miriam Rabelo Universidade Federal da Bahia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/2179-0892.ra.2016.121935

Keywords:

Ethical Practice, Candomblé, Feitura, Relations Between Humans and Orixás

Abstract

The paper describes events that took place in candomblé houses of Salvador, Bahia, in order to reflect on the candomblé’s particular form of posing and solving ethical problems, of forming adepts’ ethical sensibility and offering conditions for its exercise in the everyday life of the religious community. Approaching situations involving the initiation and gradual formation of adepts and their relations with deities, it aims to highlight elements that define ethical practice in the candomblé and the ethical assemblage that sustains such practice

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ARAGÃO, Ricardo 2012. Ser rodante é ser-com-outros: a possessão como experiência de alteridade num candomblé de Salvador. Salvador, dissertação, ufbA.

BARRY, Andrew. 2004. “Ethical Capitalism”. In LArner, W. e WALters, W. (orgs.), Global Governmentality. Londres, Routledge.

BASTIDE, Roger. 1973. “Le Príncipe de individuation (contribuition à une philosophie africaine)”. In La Notion de personne em afrique Noire. Colloques Internationaux du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 544. Paris, Éditions du cnrs.

BASTIDE, Roger. [1958] 2001. O Candomblé da Bahia. São Paulo, Companhia da Letras.

DEWEY, John. [1908] 1980. “Teoria da Vida Moral”. In Dewey. Coleção Os Pensadores. São Paulo, Abril Cultural.

FRASER, Mariam. 2006. “The Ethics of Reality and Virtual Reality: Latour, Facts and Values”. History of the Human Sciences, v. 19, n. 2: 45-72.

GOLDMAN, Márcio. 1987. “A construção ritual da pessoa: a possessão no Candomblé”. In mourA, C. E. M. (org.), Candomblé: desvendando identidades. São Paulo, emW. 2005 “Formas do saber e modos do ser: multiplicidade e ontologia no candomblé”. Religião e Sociedade. Rio de Janeiro, v. 25, n. 2: 102-120.

LAIDLAW, James. 2010. “Agency and Responsibility: Perhaps You Can Have too much of a Good Thing”. In LAmbek, M. (org.), Ordinary Ethics: anthropology, Language and action. Nova York, Fordham University Press. 2014 The Subject of Virtue: an anthropology of Ethics and Freedom. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

LAMBEK, Michael. 2010a. “Introduction”. In . (org.), Ordinary Ethics: anthropology, Language and action. Nova York, Fordham University Press.

LAMBEK, Michael. 2010b. “Toward an ethics of the act”. In . (org.), Ordinary Ethics: anthropology, Language and action. Nova York, Fordham University Press.

LATOUR, Bruno. 2012. Enquête sur les modes d’existence. Paris, Éditions La Découverte.

PAPPAS, Gregory. 2008. John Dewey’s Ethics: Democracy as Experience. Bloomington, Indiana University Press.

PRANDI, Reginaldo. 1991. Os candomblés de São Paulo: a velha magia na metrópole nova. São Paulo, Hucitec.

RABELO, Miriam. 2014. Enredos, feituras e modos de cuidado: dimensões da vida e da convivência no candomblé. Salvador, Edufba.

SOURIAU, Étienne. 1943. Les Différents modes d’existence. Paris, Puf.

STENGERS, Isabelle. 2005a. “Introductory Notes on an Ecology of Practices”. Cultural Studies Review, v.11, n.1: 183-196.

STENGERS, Isabelle. 2005b. “The Cosmopolitical Proposal”. In LAtour, B. e WeibeL, P. (orgs.), Making Things Public: atmospheres of Democracy. Cambridge, mA, mit Press.

Published

2016-10-14

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Rabelo, M. (2016). Notes on the Ethics of Candomblé. Revista De Antropologia, 59(2), 109-130. https://doi.org/10.11606/2179-0892.ra.2016.121935