Academic research challenges in Brasil and its impairment by COVID-19 pandemic
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2176-7262.rmrp.2021.181236Keywords:
Undergraduate medical education, Biomedical research, Fellowships and scholarships, Pandemic, COVID-19Abstract
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic and its control measures, which have not been experienced in the world in the last hundred years, have impacted academic scientific production, which, in Brazil, was already in the process of progressive erosion of its foundations. Thus, scientific initiation during medical graduation, which depends on funding and institutional structure, and extremely beneficial to the graduation process, was jeopardized due to restrictive measures.
Objective: This article aims to expose the point of view of undergraduate medical students enrolled in a scientific initiation program about the panorama of Brazilian academic scientific production and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in its multiple aspects.
Discussion: The lack of an effective scientific initiation is one of the many factors that lead to a decline in the number of medical researchers. The way that scientific initiation is placed, as part of a parallel curriculum, and a whole scrapped public production structure are impairing, chronic and noteworthy features. The apparatus of national scientific production is mostly structured in Higher Education Institutions and research institutions, both public. Within the scope of graduation, it can be didactically subdivided into four pillars: financial support, structure, student proactivity and the advisor's aptitude. The COVID-19 pandemic has been an additional blow to this weakened and fragile structure. Scientific initiation was thus negatively impacted. Public opinion and political aspects further influence an imbroglio of “scientific denial” and a craving for effective information and solutions to the unprecedented problem of a pandemic of this proportion.
Conclusion: It is clear that national scientific production is placed in a survival situation in the face of new challenges posed by the pandemic. Likewise, scientific initiation is less and less stimulating during graduation, even though it is an experience of great value in medical and personal development.
Downloads
References
Morens DM, Folkers GK, Fauci AS. What Is a Pandemic? J INFECT DIS. 2009 Oct;200(7):1018-21.
Wang C, Horby PW, Hayden FG, Gao GF. A novel coronavirus outbreak of global health concern. The Lancet. 2020 Feb;395(10223):470-3.
Cucinotta D, Vanelli M. WHO Declares COVID-19 a Pandemic. Acta Biomed. 2020 03 19;91(1):157-60.
Garrison HH, Deschamps AM. NIH research funding and early career physician scientists: continuing challenges in the 21st century. FASEB j. 2014 Mar;28(3):1049-58.
Nel D, Burman RJ, Hoffman R, Randera-Rees S. The attitudes of medical students to research. S Afr Med J. 2013 Dec 6;104(1):33.
Saraiva, JL. Papel da extensão universitária na formação de estudantes e professores. Brasília méd. 2007;44(3):225-233.
Pruskil S, Burgwinkel P, Georg W, Keil T, Kiessling C. Medical students’ attitudes towards science and involvement in research activities: A comparative study with students from a reformed and a traditional curriculum. Medical Teacher. 2009 Jan;31(6):e254-e259.
Abu-Zaid A, Alkattan K. Integration of scientific research training into undergraduate medical education: a reminder call. Medical Education Online. 2013 Jan;18(1):22832.
Resende J, Alves R, Coutinho M, Bragagnoli G, Araújo C. Importância da Iniciação Científica e Projetos de Extensão para Graduação em Medicina. Revista Brasileira de Ciências da Saúde. 2013 May 31;17(1):11-8.
Frenk J, Chen L, Bhutta ZA, Cohen J, Crisp N, Evans T, et al. Health professionals for a new century: transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world. The Lancet. 2010 Dec;376(9756):1923-58.
Peres CM, Andrade AdS, Garcia SB. Atividades extracurriculares: multiplicidade e diferenciação necessárias ao currícu. Rev bras educ med. 2007 Dec;31(3):203-11.
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico – CNPq [internet]. Mapa de Investimentos [cited 2021 Mar 19]. Available from: http://efomento.cnpq.br/efomento/distribuicaoGeografica/distribuicaoGeografica.do?metodo=apresentar.
Marsilli LRB, Smecellato FB, Silva Júnior OdCe. Medical education in COVID-19 pandemic: medical students' point of view. Medicina (Ribeirão Preto). 2020 Dec 11;53(4):490-4.
Alves Filho A, Araújo FR, Macedo MN, Araújo, MAD. Universidades Públicas Federais no Enfrentamento ao Coronavírus: mobilização e construção de capacidades e lições aprendidas. Natal: EDUFRN, 2020.
Ministro de Estado da Ciência e Tecnologia. Portaria nº 816, de 17 de dezembro de 2002. Aprovar o Regimento Interno do Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico - CNPq [internet]. São Paulo: CNPQ. [cited 2021 Jan 21]. Available from: http://centrodememoria.cnpq.br/port816.html
Coccia M. World-System Theory: A sociopolitical approach to explain World economic development in a capitalistic economy, Journal of Economics and Political Economy. 2018 vol. 5, n. 4, pp. 459-465.
Coeli CM, Carvalho MS, Lima LDd. Inovação, qualidade e quantidade: escolha dois. Cad Saúde Pública. 2016;32(1):1-2.
Zanolli MB, Boshuizen HPA, Grave WSD. Students' and Tutors' Perceptions of Problems in PBL Tutorial Groups at a Brazilian Medical School. Education for Health: Change in Learning & Practice. 2002 Jul 1;15(2):189-201.
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico – CNPq [internet]. Bolsas e Auxílios Vigentes [cited 2021 Mar 19]. Available from: http://memoria2.cnpq.br/bolsistas-vigentes/.
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico – CNPq [internet]. PIBIC Nº 10/2020 - PROGRAMA INSTITUCIONAL DE BOLSAS DE INICIAÇÃO CIENTÍFICA 2020 - 2021 [cited 2021 Mar 19]. Available from: http://portal.cnpq.br/web/guest/chamadas-publicas?p_p_id=resultadosportlet_WAR_resultadoscnpqportlet_INSTANCE_0ZaM&idDivulgacao=9483&filtro=resultados&detalha=chamadaDetalhada&exibe=exibe&id=156-120-6829&idResultado=156-120-6829.
Santana ACDA, Castro e Silva Jr O. Social impact of research in the university. Medicina (Ribeirão Preto) 2010;43(4): 455-8.
Lisboa TC, Kanaane R, Ortigoso SAF. Manual de treinamento: como desenvolver programas de capacitação, treinamento e desenvolvimento do potencial humano. São Paulo: Gen/ Atlas, 2018. Boletim - Academia Paulista de Psicologia, 38(95), 278-279. Available from: http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-711X2018000200016&lng=pt&tlng=pt.
De Negri F, Koeller P. Políticas públicas para pesquisa e inovação em face da crise da COVID-19. Nota Técnica # 64. IPEA. 2020.
Payne AA, Siow A. Does Federal Research Funding Increase University Research Output? Advances in Economic Analysis & Policy. 2003 May 14;3(1).
Tenório MdP, Beraldi G. Iniciação científica no Brasil e nos cursos de medicina. Rev Assoc Med Bras. 2010;56(4):390-3.
Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (Brasil). Nota técnica nº 3/2020, processo n° 25351.910775/2020-98, de 23 de março de 2020. Orientações aos patrocinadores, centros e investigadores envolvidos na condução de pesquisas clínicas autorizadas pela Anvisa. Ministério da Saúde, março de 2020. Available from: https://www.gov.br/anvisa/pt-br/arquivos-noticias-anvisa/795json-file-1
US Food and Drug Administration. FDA Guidance on Conduct of Clinical Trials of Medical Products During COVID-19 Pandemic: Guidance for Industry, Investigators, and Institutional Review Boards [Updated on April 16, 2020]. In United States. Food and Drug Administration. United States. Food and Drug Administration. 2020, April.
Angelo C. Brazilian scientists reeling as federal funds slashed by nearly half. Nature. 2017 Apr 3. Available from: https://www.nature.com/news/brazilian-scientists-reeling-as-federal-funds-slashed-by-nearly-half-1.21766.
Escobar H. Budget cap would stifle Brazilian science, critics say. Science. 2016 Oct 18. Available from: https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/10/budget-cap-would-stifle-brazilian-science-critics-say.
Porto Mayla Yara. Uma revolta popular contra a vacinação. Cienc. Cult. [Internet]. 2003 Jan [cited 2021 Jan 21] ; 55( 1 ): 53-54. Available from: http://cienciaecultura.bvs.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0009-67252003000100032&lng=en.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Eduardo Alexandre Rancan, Eloísa Ianes Frota , Tábata Marina Nóbrega de Freitas , Agnaldo Bruno Chies, Orlando de Castro-e-Silva Jr
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
