The semiotic form of scale
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1980-4016.esse.2023.209352Keywords:
Architectural design, Architecturological reduction, Numeric designAbstract
The meaning of the French word forme can go from concrete to abstract, depending on whether it is understood from the side of art, logic or mathematics. It is suggested that the categories of iconic and symbolic signs of Ch. S. Peirce's semiotics can shed light on the situation regarding architectural forms. These are often approached under an iconic aspect whereas their conception also passes by verbal and numerical forms. Scale is inseparable from these forms. The article exposes a form proper to the architecturological scale, which, composed of the triad of concepts reference, dimension, relevance, joins the Peircian semiotic categories of firstness, secondness and thirdness. These concepts are formally presented by the examination of the conditions of attribution of measures to the Arche de la Défense (Paris). They are then validated by the analysis of a passage from Vitruvius concerning the attribution of measures to a public square. The consequences of the architecturological reduction of architectural design to measurement are then examined in relation to the considerations of various authors. In particular, the Thomian opposition of form to content, which is distinguished from the Grangerian opposition of form to content, is interpreted as iconic for the former, symbolic for the latter. The hypothesis of a vicarious function of the scale is then introduced between these two registers.
Downloads
References
ABRAM, Pol. Viollet-le-Duc et le rationalisme médiéval. Paris : Vincent-Fréal, 1934.
BERTIN, Jacques. Sémiologie graphique. Paris : Mouton/Gauthier-Villars, 1974.
BOUDON, Philippe. Sur l’espace architectural. Marseille : Parenthèses, 1983.
BOUDON, Philippe. L’Architecturologie dans la mesure du possible. Cahiers de philosophie du langage, n. 4. Paris : L’Harmattan, 2000.
BOUDON, Philippe. La notion d’échelle et les catégories de Ch. S. Peirce. In : HÉNAULT, ANNE. Questions de sémiotique. Paris : PUF, 2003. p. 467-480.
BOUDON, Philippe. Conception. Paris : Éditions de la Villette, 2004.
BOUDON, Philippe. Entre Géométrie et architecture. Paris : Les Éditions de la Villette, 2019.
BOUDON, Pierre. Le Paradigme de l’architecture. Candiac/Québec : Les éditions Balzac, 1992.
JEANNERET, Emmanuelle. Géographie de la Maison et Architecture des territoires. Paris : Economica-Anthropos, 2007.
LEIBNIZ, Gottfried Wilhelm. La caractéristique géométrique. Paris : Librarie Philosophique J. Vrin, 1995.
MERLEAU-PONTY, Maurice. Signes. Paris : Gallimard, 2001.
NEF, Frédéric. Leibniz et le langage. Paris : PUF, 2000.
NORBERG-SCHULZ, Christian. Système logique de l’architecture. Liège : Mardaga, 1998.
PEIRCE, Charles Sanders. Pragmatisme et pragmaticisme. OEuvres I. Paris : Cerf, 2002.
PICON, Antoine. Culture numérique en architecture. Basel : Birkhaüser, 2010.
RAYNAUD, Dominique. La Forme urbaine, une notion exemplaire pour l’épistémologie et la sociologie des sciences. In : BOUDON, Philippe (éd.). Langages singuliers et partagés de l’urbain. Paris : L’Harmattan, 1999.
SERFATI, Michel. La révolution symbolique : la constitution de l’écriture symbolique mathématique. Paris : Petra, 2005.
THOM, René. Modèles physiques et biologiques de la singularité, Cahiers S.T.S. n. 5. Paris : Éditions du CNRS, 1984.
VALÉRY, Paul. Eupalinos, ou l’Architecte – L’âme et la danse – Dialogue de l’arbre. Paris : Gallimard, 1970.
VIOLLET-LE-DUC, Eugène-Emmanuel. Dictionnaire raisonné de l'architecture française du XIe au XVIe siècle. Paris : Librairies-Imprimeries Réunies, 1854.
VITRUVE. Les dix livres d’architecture. Trad. Ch. Perrault. Liège : Mardaga, 1684.
VUILLEMIN, Jules. Mathématiques et métaphysique chez Descartes. Paris : PUF, 1960.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Philippe Boudon
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The authors grant the journal all copyrights relating to the work published. The concepts expressed in signed articles are absolute and exclusive responsibility of their authors.