Binary and ternary cultures: from intolerance to semiotic translation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1980-4016.esse.2022.198470Keywords:
Binary structures, Ternary structures, Intolerance, Typology of cultureAbstract
Based on the formulation proposed by the cultural semiotician Yuri Lotman, we are interested in discussing how binary structures that elucidate the semiotic functioning of intolerance, unlike what happens with ternary structures, which are characterized by ambivalence and interchange with different cultural spheres. Both will be explored as typologies that, according to Lotman, antecipate the apprehension of cultures as systems of languages that are organized due to the presence of a dominant. Thus, in the case of binary structures, this occurs through the spatial dynamics established between inside/outside or inside/outside, where the separation between “culture itself” and “foreign” arises, so that everything that is not part of the former is seen as a threat, generating intolerance. On the other hand, in ternary structures, “different” is considered a source of information through which individualities characterized by diversity and semiotic heterogeneity are constructed. With this discussion, we aim to show how intolerance is understood as a cultural semiotic phenomenon and how it is constantly strained by the movement of the semiotic space of relationships.
Downloads
References
ABBAGNANO, Nicola. Dicionário de Filosofia. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2003.
ARISTÓTELES. Metafísica. São Paulo: Loyola, 2002.
BITTAR, Eduardo C.B. Curso de filosofia aristotélica. São Paulo: Manole, 2003.
COLLINS, Patricia Hill; BILGE, Sirma. Interseccionalidade. São Paulo: Boitempo, 2021.
HEGEL, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. A razão na história. Introdução à filosofia da história universal. Lisboa: Ed. 70, 1995.
JAKOBSON, Roman. O dominante. In: LIMA, Luiz Costa (Org.). Teoria da literatura em suas fontes. Rio de Janeiro: Francisco Alves, 1983. p. 485-491.
LOTMAN, Iuri M. Caza de brujas. La semiótica del miedo. In: Revista de Occidente. Madrid: Fundación José Ortega y Gasset, n. 329, out. 2008. p. 5-33.
LOTMAN, Iuri. Cultura y explosión. Lo previsible y lo imprevisible en los procesos de cambio social. Barcelona: Gedisa Editorial, 1999.
LOTMAN, Iuri. La semiosfera I. Semiótica de la cultura y del texto. Madrid: Ediciones Cátedra, 1996.
LOTMAN, Iuri. La semiosfera II. Semiótica de la cultura, del texto, de la conducta y del espacio. Madrid: Ediciones Cátedra, 1998.
LOTMAN, Iuri. La semiosfera III. Semiótica de las artes e de la cultura. Madrid: Ediciones Cátedra, 2000.
LOTMAN, Iuri. O problema do signo e do sistema sígnico na tipologia da cultura anterior ao século XX. In: LOTMAN, I.; USPENSKII, B.; IVANÓV, V. Ensaios de semiótica soviética. Lisboa: Livros Horizonte, 1981. p. 101-130.
LOTMAN, Iuri; USPENSKI, B.A. Sobre el mecanismo semiótico de la cultura. In: LOTMAN, Iuri. La semiosfera III. Semiótica de las artes e de la cultura. Madrid: Ediciones Cátedra, 2000. p. 168-193.
LOTMAN, Iuri. Sobre el metalenguaje de las descripciones tipológicas de la cultura. In: La semiosfera II. Semiótica de la cultura, del texto, de la conducta y del espacio. Madrid: Ediciones Cátedra, 1998. p. 93-123.
LOTMAN, Iuri. Sobre o problema da tipologia da cultura. In: SCHNAIDERMAN, Boris. Semiótica russa. São Paulo: Perspectiva, 1979. p. 31-42.
LOTMAN, Iuri. The unpredictable workings of culture. Tallin: TLU Press, 2013.
LOTMAN, Iuri. Universe of the mind. A semiotic theory of culture. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1990.
MAKARYCHEV, A.; & YATSYK, A. Lotman’s cultural semiotics and the political. Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield International, 2017.
MORA, José Ferrater. Dicionário de Filosofia. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2001.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Regiane Miranda de Oliveira Nakagawa, Fábio Sadao Nakagawa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The authors grant the journal all copyrights relating to the work published. The concepts expressed in signed articles are absolute and exclusive responsibility of their authors.