Amixokori, Pataxó, Monoxó, Kumanoxó, Kutaxó, Kutatoi, Maxakali, Malali and Makoni: indian peoples or differentiated Subgroups of a same Nation? A reflection proposal.

Authors

  • Maria Hilda Baqueiro Paraíso Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências Humanas. Depto. de História. Universidade Federal da Bahia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2448-1750.revmae.1994.109203

Keywords:

Indians -M inas Gerais - Bahia - Espírito Santo - Archaeological data - Political strategies - Social organization - Ethnicity - Territory - Ethnohistory.

Abstract

This work results from a ten year reflection that found its explanatory axis during the elaboration of the anthropological report on the Maxakali indians, concluded in 1992. We intend to develop here considerations on the possibility of an unity among subgroups which were traditionally viewed as differentiated groups by anthropologists, historians and travellers. It is not a conclusive work, but a proposal for an interdisciplinary study that starting from the model presented here, could help in widening the reflection on similar ethnographic situations in other areas of Brasil.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

1994-12-19

Issue

No. 4 (1994)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 1994 Maria Hilda Baqueiro Paraíso

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

PARAÍSO, Maria Hilda Baqueiro. Amixokori, Pataxó, Monoxó, Kumanoxó, Kutaxó, Kutatoi, Maxakali, Malali and Makoni: indian peoples or differentiated Subgroups of a same Nation? A reflection proposal. Revista do Museu de Arqueologia e Etnologia, São Paulo, Brasil, n. 4, p. 173–187, 1994. DOI: 10.11606/issn.2448-1750.revmae.1994.109203. Disponível em: https://www.revistas.usp.br/revmae/article/view/109203.. Acesso em: 18 may. 2024.