Benefits of extracorporeal shockwave in the treatment of skin ulcers: a literature review

Authors

  • Marcus Yu Bin Pai Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina. Hospital das Clínicas. Instituto de Medicina Física e Reabilitação
  • Juliana Takiguti Toma Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina. Hospital das Clínicas. Instituto de Medicina Física e Reabilitação
  • Danielle Bianchini Rampim Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina. Hospital das Clínicas. Instituto de Medicina Física e Reabilitação
  • Marta Imamura Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina. Hospital das Clínicas. Instituto de Medicina Física e Reabilitação https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0355-9697
  • Linamara Rizzo Battistella Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina. Departamento de Medicina Legal, Ética Médica, Medicina Social e do Trabalho https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5275-0733

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5935/0104-7795.20160008

Keywords:

High-Energy Shock Waves, Treatment Outcome, Therapeutics

Abstract

Extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) has analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects. With the evolution and comprehension of its biological and physical mechanisms, the application of ESWT on other pathologies has also been studied, especially in musculoskeletal diseases. Recently, studies on animal models have shown its angiogenic capacity and a higher rate of local re-epithelization. These small studies led to few trials using low-energy, radial ESWT to treat problematic chronic skin ulcers. Skin ulcers have diverse etiologies, ranging from pressure ulcers, burns, venous or arterial ulcers, and even diabetic ulcers. Their treatment is usually a challenge, due to the long-term treatment and high costs. Objective: To review the literature and evaluate the efficacy of ESWT in caring for skin ulcers of various etiologies: diabetic ulcers, pressure ulcers, burns, post-traumatic ulcers, venous and arterial ulcers. Method: A literature review was made, with only human trials included. Results: 9 articles were selected that fulfilled the eligibility criteria. The studies included evaluations of 788 patients. The manuscripts demonstrated a large variability regarding the interventions made. There was heterogeneity regarding intervention time, number of pulses, frequency of sessions, and also the number of sessions, energy density used, and the type of shock wave used in therapies. Some of the included trials found a higher rate of complete wound healing and faster epithelization in patients with chronic lesions, unresponsive to the traditional measures. However, there were few studies in the literature with proper methodological quality. Conclusion: ESWT is a promising alternative for the treatment of patients unresponsive to conventional measures. The results are promising, although the evidence regarding wound healing and acceleration of wound healing is still limited. The studies selected did not report any significant side effects

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ogden JA, Tóth-Kischkat A, Schultheiss R. Principles of shock wave therapy. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;(387):8-17. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00003086-200106000-00003

Biedermann R, Martin A, Handle G, Auckenthaler T, Bach C, Krismer M. Extracorporeal shock waves in the treatment of nonunions. J Trauma. 2003;54(5):936-42. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.TA.0000042155.26936.03

Buchbinder R, Ptasznik R, Gordon J, Buchanan J, Prabaharan V, Forbes A. Ultrasound-guided extracorporeal shock wave therapy for plantar fasciitis: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2002;288(11):1364-72. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.288.11.1364

Schaden W, Fischer A, Sailler A. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy of nonunion or delayed osseous union. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;(387):90-4. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00003086-200106000-00012

Hofmann A, Ritz U, Hessmann MH, Alini M, Rommens PM, Rompe JD. Extracorporeal shock wave-mediated changes in proliferation, differentiation, and gene expression of human osteoblasts. J Trauma. 2008;65(6):1402-10. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e318173e7c2

Aicher A, Heeschen C, Sasaki K, Urbich C, Zeiher AM, Dimmeler S. Low-energy shock wave for enhancing recruitment of endothelial progenitor cells: a new modality to increase efficacy of cell therapy in chronic hind limb ischemia. Circulation. 2006;114(25):2823-30. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.628623

Oi K, Fukumoto Y, Ito K, Uwatoku T, Abe K, Hizume T, et al. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy ameliorates hindlimb ischemia in rabbits. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2008;214(2):151-8. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1620/tjem.214.151

Hayashi D, Kawakami K, Ito K, Ishii K, Tanno H, Imai Y, et al. Low-energy extracorporeal shock wave therapy enhances skin wound healing in diabetic mice: a critical role of endothelial nitric oxide synthase. Wound Repair Regen. 2012;20(6):887-95. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-475X.2012.00851.x

Takahashi N, Ohtori S, Saisu T, Moriya H, Wada Y. Second application of low-energy shock waves has a cumulative effect on free nerve endings. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;443:315-9.

Schaper NC, Apelqvist J, Bakker K. The international consensus and practical guidelines on the management and prevention of the diabetic foot. Curr Diab Rep. 2003;3(6):475-9. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11892-003-0010-4

Rosa TJS, Cintra LKL, Freitas KB, Alcântara PFDL, Spacassassi F, Rosa CDP, et al. Ulceras por pressão: tratamento. Acta Fisiatr. 2013;20(2):106-11. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/0104-7795.20130017

Ferreira MC, Tuma P Jr, Carvalho VF, Kamamoto F. Complex wounds. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2006;61(6):571-8. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1807-59322006000600014

Moretti B, Notarnicola A, Maggio G, Moretti L, Pascone M, Tafuri S, et al. The management of neuropathic ulcers of the foot in diabetes by shock wave therapy. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2009;10:54. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-10-54

Larking AM, Duport S, Clinton M, Hardy M, Andrews K. Randomized control of extracorporeal shock wave therapy versus placebo for chronic decubitus ulceration. Clin Rehabil. 2010;24(3):222-9. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0269215509346083

Schaden W, Thiele R, Kölpl C, Pusch M, Nissan A, Attinger CE, et al. Shock wave therapy for acute and chronic soft tissue wounds: a feasibility study. J Surg Res. 2007;143(1):1-12. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2007.01.009

Wang CJ, Wu RW, Yang YJ. Treatment of diabetic foot ulcers: a comparative study of extracorporeal shockwave therapy and hyperbaric oxygen therapy. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2011;92(2):187-93. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2011.01.019

Wolff KS, Wibmer A, Pusch M, Prusa AM, Pretterklieber M, Teufelsbauer H, et al. The influence of comorbidities and etiologies on the success of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for chronic soft tissue wounds: midterm results. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2011;37(7):1111-9. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2011.04.007

Arnó A, García O, Hernán I, Sancho J, Acosta A, Barret JP. Extracorporeal shock waves, a new non-surgical method to treat severe burns. Burns. 2010;36(6):844-9. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2009.11.012

Saggini R, Figus A, Troccola A, Cocco V, Saggini A, Scuderi N. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy for management of chronic ulcers in the lower extremities. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2008;34(8):1261-71. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2008.01.010

Ottomann C, Hartmann B, Tyler J, Maier H, Thiele R, Schaden W, et al. Prospective randomized trial of accelerated re-epithelization of skin graft donor sites using extracorporeal shock wave therapy. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;211(3):361-7. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.05.012

Dumfarth J, Zimpfer D, Vögele-Kadletz M, Holfeld J, Sihorsch F, Schaden W, et al. Prophylactic low-energy shock wave therapy improves wound healing after vein harvesting for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a prospective, randomized trial. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;86(6):1909-13. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.07.117

Haake M, Böddeker IR, Decker T, Buch M, Vogel M, Labek G, et al. Side-effects of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) in the treatment of tennis elbow. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2002;122(4):222-8. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-001-0362-7

Chen YJ, Wang CJ, Yang KD, Kuo YR, Huang HC, Huang YT, et al. Extracorporeal shock waves promote healing of collagenase-induced Achilles tendinitis and increase TGF-beta1 and IGF-I expression. J Orthop Res. 2004;22(4):854-61. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.orthres.2003.10.013

Kuo YR, Wang CT, Wang FS, Yang KD, Chiang YC, Wang CJ. Extracorporeal shock wave treatment modulates skin fibroblast recruitment and leukocyte infiltration for enhancing extended skin-flap survival. Wound Repair Regen. 2009;17(1):80-7. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-475X.2008.00444.x

Wang CJ. An overview of shock wave therapy in musculoskeletal disorders. Chang Gung Med J. 2003;26(4):220-32.

Published

2016-03-07

Issue

Section

Review Article

How to Cite

1.
Pai MYB, Toma JT, Rampim DB, Imamura M, Battistella LR. Benefits of extracorporeal shockwave in the treatment of skin ulcers: a literature review. Acta Fisiátr. [Internet]. 2016 Mar. 7 [cited 2024 May 17];23(1):35-41. Available from: https://www.revistas.usp.br/actafisiatrica/article/view/137608