Development of a protocol for the assessment of patients with pressure ulcers through telemedicine and digital images
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2317-0190.v14i4a102863Keywords:
Spinal Cord Injuries, Pressure Ulcer, Diagnostic Imaging, TelemedicineAbstract
Pressure ulcers are frequent complications in patients with spinal cord injuries. These ulcers need an early diagnosis and a strict follow-up to prevent a more severe evolution and delays in the rehabilitation process. Unfortunately, patients do not always have access to a center specialized in the treatment of wounds, and thus, telemedicine can be useful in such cases. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of a protocol for the assessment of pressure ulcers through digital images. Methods: 15 patients were selected, totaling 33 ulcers. The patients were separately assessed by 2 on-site physiatrists, who filled out the first part of the protocol (patients’ clinical data) at the time of the consultation and took the photographs. These were sent to the physiatrists at-distance, who evaluated the wounds through the photographs and the data sent by the on-site physician. The similarities and differences between the two on-site physicians, between the on-site physicians and the physicians at-distance and between the two physicians at-distance were compared regarding the degree, necrosis, infection, fistula, secretion, wound border and depth aspect and conduct. The statistical analysis was based on Kappa calculations, a confidence interval and P value. Results: The highest Kappa values were observed when the on-site assessments were compared. For necrosis, degree and infection, the On-site Assessment (S) x Assessment at distance (D) Kappas were substantial and moderate. For the item conduct, the Kappa varied from weak to almost perfect. As for the evaluations of the borders, depth, secretion and fistula, there were divergences. Conclusion: The protocol is effective to assess wound necrosis, degree and infection. There is some difficulty in using the method to evaluate the border and depth aspect, secretion and fistula. The method showed to be more satisfactory for the assessment of pressure ulcers grade I and II.
Downloads
References
Costa MP, Sakae EK, Duarte GG, Ferreira MC. Ulceras de pressao. In: Greve DMJ, Casalis MEP, Barros Filho TEP. Diagnóstico e tratamento da lesao da medula espinal. Sao Paulo: Roca; 2001. p.329-65.
O' Connor KC, Kirshblum SC. Ulceras de pressao. In: Delisa JA. Tratado de Medicina de Reabilitaçao. 3 ed. Barueri: Manole; 2002. p.1113-28.
Cuddigan J, Berlowitz DR, Ayello EA. Pressure ulcers in America: prevalence, incidence, and implications for the future. An executive summary of the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel monograph. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2001;14(4):208-15.
Miot HA, Silveira P, Rocha M, Chao LW. Acurácia diagnóstica da fotografia dermatológica digital em teledermatologia. In: VI Reuniao Anual dos Dermatologistas do Estado de Sao Paulo (RADESP); 2001 Dez 6-8; Campos de Jordao. Disponível em: http://www.sbd-sp.org.br/radesp/posteres.htm
Maglogiannis I. Design and implementation of a calibrated store and forward imaging system for teledermatology. J Med Syst. 2004;28(5):455-67.
Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159-74.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2007 Acta Fisiátrica
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
